- Quick Answer: What Are One-Party Consent States?
- Complete List of One-Party Consent States (2026)
- All-Party Consent States (Two-Party Consent)
- How One-Party Consent Works
- Federal Wiretapping Law (18 U.S.C. § 2511)
- Interstate Recording: Which State's Law Applies?
- Workplace Recording in One-Party Consent States
- Recording Police Officers
- Vicarious Consent: Recording on Behalf of Children
- Penalties for Illegal Recording
- Recording Apps and Technology
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Summary
- Related Resources
- Sources and Legal References

Last Updated: January 2026 | Verified against current state statutes and 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Quick Answer: What Are One-Party Consent States?
One-party consent states allow you to record a conversation if you are a participant, without needing permission from the other parties. As of 2026, there are 38 one-party consent states plus the District of Columbia. If you are recording, your consent counts as the “one party.”
| Key Point | Answer |
|---|---|
| Number of One-Party Consent States | 38 states + D.C. |
| Can you record your own conversations? | Yes, in one-party consent states |
| Do you need to tell the other person? | No, not legally required |
| Federal law standard | One-party consent (18 U.S.C. § 2511) |
| Recording someone without being part of conversation? | Illegal in all states (wiretapping) |
Complete List of One-Party Consent States (2026)
The following 38 states (plus D.C.) follow the one-party consent rule for recording conversations:
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Ala. Code § 13A-11-30 | One-party consent |
| Alaska | Alaska Stat. § 42.20.310 | One-party consent |
| Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3005 | One-party consent |
| Arkansas | Ark. Code § 5-60-120 | One-party consent |
| Colorado | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303 | One-party consent |
| D.C. | D.C. Code § 23-542 | One-party consent |
| Georgia | Ga. Code § 16-11-62 | One-party consent |
| Hawaii | Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42 | One-party consent |
| Idaho | Idaho Code § 18-6702 | One-party consent |
| Indiana | Ind. Code § 35-33.5-5-5 | One-party consent |
| Iowa | Iowa Code § 808B.2 | One-party consent |
| Kansas | Kan. Stat. § 21-6101 | One-party consent |
| Kentucky | Ky. Rev. Stat. § 526.010 | One-party consent |
| Louisiana | La. Rev. Stat. § 15:1303 | One-party consent |
| Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 709 | One-party consent |
| Minnesota | Minn. Stat. § 626A.02 | One-party consent |
| Mississippi | Miss. Code § 41-29-531 | One-party consent |
| Missouri | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402 | One-party consent |
| Nebraska | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290 | One-party consent |
| New Jersey | N.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-4 | One-party consent |
| New Mexico | N.M. Stat. § 30-12-1 | One-party consent |
| New York | N.Y. Penal Law § 250.00 | One-party consent |
| North Carolina | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287 | One-party consent |
| North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02 | One-party consent |
| Ohio | Ohio Rev. Code § 2933.52 | One-party consent |
| Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. tit. 13, § 176.4 | One-party consent |
| Rhode Island | R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21 | One-party consent |
| South Carolina | S.C. Code § 17-30-30 | One-party consent |
| South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20 | One-party consent |
| Tennessee | Tenn. Code § 39-13-601 | One-party consent |
| Texas | Tex. Penal Code § 16.02 | One-party consent |
| Utah | Utah Code § 77-23a-4 | One-party consent |
| Virginia | Va. Code § 19.2-62 | One-party consent |
| West Virginia | W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3 | One-party consent |
| Wisconsin | Wis. Stat. § 968.31 | One-party consent |
| Wyoming | Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-702 | One-party consent |
Note: Vermont has no specific recording statute but is generally considered a one-party consent state under federal law.
All-Party Consent States (Two-Party Consent)
For comparison, the following 12 states require all parties to consent before recording:
| State | Link to Recording Laws |
|---|---|
| California | California Recording Laws |
| Connecticut | Connecticut Recording Laws |
| Delaware | Delaware Recording Laws |
| Florida | Florida Recording Laws |
| Illinois | Illinois Recording Laws |
| Maryland | Maryland Recording Laws |
| Massachusetts | Massachusetts Recording Laws |
| Michigan | Michigan Recording Laws |
| Montana | Montana Recording Laws |
| Nevada | Nevada Recording Laws |
| New Hampshire | New Hampshire Recording Laws |
| Oregon | Oregon Recording Laws |
| Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Recording Laws |
| Washington | Washington Recording Laws |
For a comprehensive guide to all-party consent states, see our Two-Party Consent States Guide.
How One-Party Consent Works
Understanding the mechanics of one-party consent is essential for staying on the right side of the law.

Who Can Be the “One Party”?
In one-party consent states:
- You can record any conversation you are actively participating in
- You can authorize someone else (like law enforcement) to record a conversation you’re having
- Your consent is the “one party” — no one else needs to know
What You Cannot Do (Even in One-Party Consent States)
- Record conversations you’re not part of — this is illegal wiretapping in all states
- Plant a recording device to capture conversations without being present
- Record in locations with heightened privacy expectations (bathrooms, bedrooms, medical facilities)
- Use recordings for illegal purposes (blackmail, harassment)
Common Scenarios Explained
| Scenario | Legal in One-Party Consent State? |
|---|---|
| Recording a phone call you’re on | Yes |
| Recording an in-person conversation you’re having | Yes |
| Recording a business meeting you’re attending | Yes (but may violate company policy) |
| Recording a conversation between two other people | No (illegal wiretapping) |
| Leaving your phone to record after you leave | No (you’re no longer a party) |
| Recording your landlord during a conversation | Yes |
| Recording a police officer during an encounter | Generally yes (varies by circumstance) |
| Recording your child’s conversation | Complex (see vicarious consent below) |
Federal Wiretapping Law (18 U.S.C. § 2511)
Federal law establishes a baseline of one-party consent for recording conversations. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2511:
It is not unlawful “for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where such person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception.”
How Federal and State Laws Interact
- State laws cannot be less restrictive than federal law (one-party consent is the minimum)
- States can be more restrictive (all-party consent states like California)
- For interstate calls, the stricter state’s law generally applies
Interstate Recording: Which State’s Law Applies?
When recording a conversation that crosses state lines, determining which law applies can be complex.

General Rule: The Stricter Law Applies
Most courts and legal experts advise following the stricter standard:
- If either party is in an all-party consent state, get consent from everyone
- Example: A call between New York (one-party) and California (all-party) should follow California’s all-party consent requirement
Safe Practice for Interstate Calls
- Identify the location of all parties
- Research the recording laws for each state involved
- When in doubt, either:
- Inform all parties and get consent, or
- Don’t record
Interstate Recording Chart
| Caller Location | Recipient Location | Recommended Approach |
|---|---|---|
| One-party consent state | One-party consent state | One-party consent sufficient |
| One-party consent state | All-party consent state | Get all-party consent |
| All-party consent state | One-party consent state | Get all-party consent |
| All-party consent state | All-party consent state | Get all-party consent |
Workplace Recording in One-Party Consent States
Even though recording may be legal in one-party consent states, workplace recordings raise additional considerations.
Legal But Potentially Risky
In one-party consent states, employees can legally record:
- Conversations with supervisors
- Meetings they attend
- Phone calls they participate in
However, employers may have policies prohibiting recording, and violating these policies can result in:
- Termination for policy violation
- Loss of severance or benefits
- Damage to professional reputation
Employer Recording of Employees
Employers in one-party consent states can generally record:
- Their own conversations with employees
- Business calls (with proper notification)
- Video in common areas (without audio in some jurisdictions)
Restrictions typically exist for:
- Union organizing activities (NLRA protections)
- Bathrooms, changing rooms, and break rooms
- Personal phone calls on personal devices
Recording Police Officers
The right to record police officers performing their duties in public has been recognized by federal courts, regardless of state recording consent laws.
First Amendment Protections
Multiple federal circuit courts have held that recording police in public is protected by the First Amendment:
- Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Circuit, 2011)
- ACLU v. Alvarez (7th Circuit, 2012)
- Turner v. Lieutenant Driver (5th Circuit, 2017)
Limitations on Recording Police
You may still face restrictions if you:
- Interfere with police operations
- Record in areas where you have no right to be
- Violate other laws in the process
Vicarious Consent: Recording on Behalf of Children
Can a parent legally record their child’s conversations? This complex area involves the doctrine of “vicarious consent.”
What Is Vicarious Consent?
Vicarious consent allows a parent or guardian to consent to recording on behalf of a minor child when:
- The parent has a good faith belief the recording is in the child’s best interest
- The purpose is to protect the child from harm
Court Treatment by Circuit
Federal courts have recognized vicarious consent in various contexts:
- Pollock v. Pollock (6th Circuit, 1998) — recognized vicarious consent
- Thompson v. Dulaney (10th Circuit, 1992) — allowed parental recording
However, this doctrine has limits and does not permit:
- Recording adult conversations the child overhears
- Recording for purposes unrelated to the child’s welfare
- Recording in bad faith or for improper motives
Penalties for Illegal Recording
Violating recording consent laws can result in both criminal and civil penalties.
Federal Penalties (18 U.S.C. § 2511)
- Criminal: Up to 5 years imprisonment
- Civil: Actual damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees
- Minimum statutory damages: $10,000 per violation
State Penalties Vary Widely
| State | Criminal Classification | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| California | Felony or Misdemeanor | $2,500 fine and/or 1 year jail (misdemeanor); up to 3 years prison (felony) |
| Florida | Third-degree felony | Up to 5 years prison, $5,000 fine |
| Illinois | Class 4 felony | 1-3 years prison |
| Maryland | Felony | Up to 5 years prison, $10,000 fine |
| Massachusetts | Felony | Up to 5 years prison, $10,000 fine |
| Pennsylvania | Third-degree felony | Up to 7 years prison |
Recording Apps and Technology
Many apps and services now make recording calls easy. Understanding the legal landscape is essential before using them.
Popular Recording Options
- iPhone Voice Memos: Built-in app for recording
- Google Voice: Can record incoming calls (announces to all parties)
- Rev Call Recorder: Third-party app for iOS
- Cube ACR: Popular Android call recorder
- TapeACall: Third-party service for iOS and Android
Best Practices
- Know your state’s law before recording
- Consider the other party’s location for phone calls
- When in doubt, inform all parties
- Store recordings securely
- Understand your company’s policies if recording work calls
Our recommended Digital Audio Recorder.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to record a conversation without consent?
It depends on your state. In the 38 one-party consent states, you can record any conversation you’re part of without telling others. In all-party consent states (12 states), everyone must agree to be recorded.
Can I record my boss without their knowledge?
In one-party consent states, yes, you can legally record conversations with your boss if you’re participating. However, it may violate company policy and could lead to termination.
Is recording someone without consent a crime?
Recording a conversation you’re not part of is illegal in all states. Recording a conversation you ARE part of is legal in one-party consent states but may be illegal in all-party consent states without everyone’s permission.
Can recordings be used in court?
Legally obtained recordings can generally be used as evidence. However, illegally obtained recordings may be inadmissible and could expose you to criminal or civil liability.
Do I need to tell someone I’m recording them?
In one-party consent states, no. In all-party consent states, yes. For interstate calls, the safest approach is to inform all parties.
Can I record a conversation to prove harassment?
Yes, in one-party consent states. Recording evidence of harassment, threats, or other misconduct is one of the most common legitimate uses of one-party consent recording.
Summary
- 38 states + D.C. follow one-party consent rules
- 12 states require all-party consent
- Federal law establishes one-party consent as the baseline
- You can record any conversation you participate in (in one-party states)
- You cannot record conversations you’re not part of (illegal everywhere)
- Interstate calls should follow the stricter state’s rules
- Workplace recordings may be legal but policy violations can still result in termination
Related Resources
- United States Recording Laws Overview
- Two-Party (All-Party) Consent States
- Recording Conversations with Your Ex
- Can I Sue Someone for Recording Me?
- Canada Recording Laws
Sources and Legal References
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
| 18 U.S.C. § 2511 | Federal wiretapping statute |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2520 | Civil remedies for wiretapping violations |
| Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press | State-by-state recording guide |
| Digital Media Law Project | Recording laws guide |
Disclaimer: This information is provided for educational purposes and should not be considered legal advice. Recording laws can be complex and may change. Consult with a qualified attorney for advice on your specific situation.
]]>
There’s a typo on this page. In the large table with the specific wording of the laws North Dakota is mislabeled in the leftmost column as North Carolina.
Thanks Daniel, I’ll fix that right away.