Iowa Recording Law Summary: Last Updated: January 2025 | Verified against current Iowa Code Quick Answer Iowa is a one-party consent state. You can legally record phone calls, in-person conversations, and electronic communications as long as you’re a party to the conversation or have consent from at least one participant. Iowa’s wiretapping law requires that … Read more
Indiana Recording Law Summary: Last Updated: January 2025 | Verified against current Indiana Code Quick Answer Indiana is a one-party consent state. You can legally record phone calls and conversations as long as you’re a party to the conversation or have consent from at least one participant. Indiana’s wiretapping law covers wire communications and provides … Read more
Idaho Recording Law Summary: Last Updated: January 2025 | Verified against current Idaho Code Quick Answer Idaho is a one-party consent state. You can legally record phone calls, in-person conversations, and electronic communications as long as you’re a party to the conversation. If you’re not participating, you need consent from at least one party to … Read more
Hawaii Recording Law Summary: Last Updated: January 2025 | Verified against current Hawaii Revised Statutes Quick Answer Hawaii is a one-party consent state. You can legally record wire, oral, or electronic communications if you’re a party to the conversation or have consent from at least one participant. Hawaii’s wiretapping law is a Class C felony, … Read more
Georgia Recording Law Summary: Last Updated: January 2025 | Verified against current Georgia Code Quick Answer Georgia is a one-party consent state for audio recording. You can legally record any conversation you’re part of without telling other participants. However, Georgia has a unique rule for video: recording activities in private places requires consent from all … Read more
Last Updated: January 2026 | Verified against current Delaware Code Quick Answer Delaware has conflicting recording laws that create legal ambiguity. The state’s wiretapping law (11 Del. C. § 2402) allows recording with one-party consent, but the privacy law (11 Del. C. § 1335) requires all-party consent. Because of this conflict, Delaware is generally treated … Read more
Last Updated: January 2026 | Verified against current Revised Code of Washington Quick Answer Washington is a two-party consent state. Under RCW 9.73.030, it is unlawful to intercept or record any private communication or conversation without consent from all parties. Consent can be satisfied by announcing that recording is occurring. Violations are a gross misdemeanor … Read more
Last Updated: January 2026 | Verified against current Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Quick Answer Pennsylvania is a strict two-party consent state. Under 18 Pa.C.S. § 5703, it is a third-degree felony to intentionally intercept, disclose, or use wire, electronic, or oral communications without consent from all parties. Civil damages include $100 per day or $1,000 minimum … Read more
Last Updated: January 2026 | Verified against current New Hampshire Revised Statutes Quick Answer New Hampshire is an all-party consent state. Under RSA 570-A:2, it is a Class B felony to intercept telecommunications or oral communications without consent from all parties. There is no one-party consent exception for private parties. Victims can sue for civil … Read more
Last Updated: January 2026 | Verified against current Illinois Compiled Statutes Quick Answer Illinois is an all-party consent state for recording private conversations. Under 720 ILCS 5/14-2, you must have consent from all parties before recording any private conversation or electronic communication. However, Illinois law only protects “private” conversations where parties have a reasonable expectation … Read more