EnglishEspañol

How to Check if Your Record Has Been Expunged

How to Check if Your Record Has Been Expunged

Updates

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Corrected the section on certificates of innocence, which used a term no state actually uses, and rebuilt it around California and District of Columbia law. Fixed the quick-check guidance so it correctly describes what a court's response means, replaced a generic list of non-expungable crimes with verified Michigan and California examples, stated Michigan's automatic set-aside timing and limits precisely, and clarified when background checks can reveal that an expunged record exists. Also added the growing group of state clean-slate laws that clear qualifying adult records with no petition, tightened an overstated description of the Freedom of Information Act, and replaced a dead legal-help link and two index citations with direct statutory sources.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources

Refreshed for accuracy: fixed seven broken links left over from the WordPress migration, corrected a citation that mismatched Illinois text with a Massachusetts statute, replaced an off-topic external link and a low-authority app link, corrected an inaccurate claim about Level 2 FBI background checks, updated outdated terminology, and added cross-links to the site's state-by-state expungement guides.

The Law Behind This Article

This article rests on 7 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.

California Penal Code

§ 1203.4In forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) (1) When a defendant has fulfilled the conditions of probation for the entire period of probation, or has been discharged prior to the termination of the period of probation, or in any other case in which a court, in its discretion and the interest of justice, determines that a defendant should be granted the relief available under this section, the defendant shall, at any time after the termination of the period of probation, if they are not then serving a sentence for an offense, on probation for an offense, or charged with the commission of an offense, be permitted by the court to withdraw their plea of guilty or plea of nolo contendere and enter a plea of not guilty; or, if they have been convicted after a plea of not guilty, the court shall set aside the verdict of guilty; and, in either case, the court shall thereupon dismiss the accusations or information against the defendant and except as noted below, the defendant shall thereafter be released from all penalties and disabilities resulting from the offense of which they have been convicted, except as provided in Section 13555 of the Vehicle Code.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Cited in 440 court opinions1940s: 51950s: 91960s: 231970s: 361980s: 271990s: 362000s: 812010s: 1402020s: 83Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: People v. Dueñas (California Court of Appeal, 5th District 2019, 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 268) · People v. Banks (California Supreme Court 1959, 53 Cal. 2d 370) · Opdyk v. California Horse Racing Board (California Court of Appeal 1995, 34 Cal. App. 4th 1826)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: California Expungement Laws: Dismissal and Record Relief, California DUI Laws: Penalties, BAC Limit & License (2026), DUI Expungement by State: Where You Can Clear Your Record

§ 851.8In force
(a) In any case where a person has been arrested and no accusatory pleading has been filed, the person arrested may petition the law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over the offense to destroy its records of the arrest. A copy of the petition shall be served upon the prosecuting attorney of the county or city having jurisdiction over the offense. The law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over the offense, upon a determination that the person arrested is factually innocent, shall, with the concurrence of the prosecuting attorney, seal its arrest records, and the petition for relief under this section for three years from the date of the arrest and thereafter destroy its arrest records and the petition. The law enforcement agency having jurisdiction over the offense shall notify the Department of Justice, and any law enforcement agency that arrested the petitioner or participated in the arrest of the petitioner for an offense for which the petitioner has been found factually innocent under this subdivision, of the sealing of the arrest records and the reason therefor.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Cited in 73 court opinions1970s: 31980s: 31990s: 72000s: 172010s: 182020s: 25Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Kerner v. Superior Court (California Court of Appeal 2012, 206 Cal. App. 4th 84) · People v. Matthews (California Court of Appeal 1992, 7 Cal. App. 4th 1052) · Tennison v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims Board (California Court of Appeal 2007, 62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 88)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Code of the District of Columbia, Title 22: Criminal Offenses and Penalties. - Chapter 41A: DNA Testing and Post-Conviction Relief for Innocent Persons.

§ 22-4135Motion to vacate a conviction or grant a new trial on the ground of actual innocence.In force
(a) A person convicted of a criminal offense in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia may move the court to vacate the conviction or to grant a new trial on grounds of actual innocence based on new evidence. (b) Notwithstanding the time limits in any other provision of law, a motion for relief under this section may be made at any time. (c) The motion shall set forth specific, non-conclusory facts: (1) Identifying the specific new evidence; (2) Establishing how that evidence demonstrates that the movant is actually innocent despite having been convicted at trial or having pled guilty; and (3) Establishing why the new evidence is not cumulative or impeaching. (1) The motion shall include an affidavit by the movant, under penalty of perjury, stating that movant is actually innocent of the crime that is the subject of the motion, and that the new evidence was not deliberately withheld by the movant for purposes of strategic advantage. (2) The denial of a motion for relief under this section shall not be admissible in any prosecution based on the filing of a false affidavit.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at github.com

Cited in 15 court opinions2010s: 102020s: 5Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: JOEL CASTON v. UNITED STATES (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2016, 146 A.3d 1082) · Williams v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2018, 187 A.3d 559) · Faltz v. United States (District of Columbia Court of Appeals 2024)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

United States Code Title 15

§ 1681eCompliance proceduresIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Every consumer reporting agency shall maintain reasonable procedures designed to avoid violations of section 1681c of this title and to limit the furnishing of consumer reports to the purposes listed under section 1681b of this title. These procedures shall require that prospective users of the information identify themselves, certify the purposes for which the information is sought, and certify that the information will be used for no other purpose. Every consumer reporting agency shall make a reasonable effort to verify the identity of a new prospective user and the uses certified by such prospective user prior to furnishing such user a consumer report. No consumer reporting agency may furnish a consumer report to any person if it has reasonable grounds for believing that the consumer report will not be used for a purpose listed in section 1681b of this title. Whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it shall follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov

Cited in 1,128 court opinions1970s: 131980s: 291990s: 452000s: 1362010s: 1792020s: 726Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez (Supreme Court of the United States 2021, 594 U.S. 413) · Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 605 F.3d 665) · Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2010, 617 F.3d 688)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: FTC Settles with Tenant-Screening Company RentGrow Over Alleged FCRA Accuracy Violations, Montana Background Check Laws (2026 Guide), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 (FCRA): Credit Report Rights Explained

§ 1681iProcedure in case of disputed accuracyIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Subject to subsection (f) and except as provided in subsection (g), if the completeness or accuracy of any item of information contained in a consumer’s file at a consumer reporting agency is disputed by the consumer and the consumer notifies the agency directly, or indirectly through a reseller, of such dispute, the agency shall, free of charge, conduct a reasonable reinvestigation to determine whether the disputed information is inaccurate and record the current status of the disputed information, or delete the item from the file in accordance with paragraph (5), before the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the agency receives the notice of the dispute from the consumer or reseller. Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the 30-day period described in subparagraph (A) may be extended for not more than 15 additional days if the consumer reporting agency receives information from the consumer during that 30-day period that is relevant to the reinvestigation.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov

Cited in 1,003 court opinions1970s: 91980s: 191990s: 322000s: 1242010s: 1682020s: 651Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010, 629 F.3d 876) · Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union (Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2010, 617 F.3d 688) · Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information Company (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1995, 45 F.3d 1329)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

United States Code Title 5

§ 552Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedingsIn forcecited in 35 of our articles
Each agency shall make available to the public information as follows: Each agency shall separately state and currently publish in the Federal Register for the guidance of the public— descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees (and in the case of a uniformed service, the members) from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions; statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency; and each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov

Cited in 11,434 court opinions1960s: 401970s: 9851980s: 16991990s: 15282000s: 17452010s: 30212020s: 2416Most recently applied by a court: 2026

Leading cases: Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (Supreme Court of the United States 1975, 421 U.S. 240) · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1980, 447 U.S. 102) · Taylor v. Sturgell (Supreme Court of the United States 2008, 553 U.S. 880)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: Public Records Laws by State: FOIA Guide for All 50 States (2026), How to File a FOIA Request (Step by Step, 2026), Virginia Freedom of Information Act: Who Can Request and How (2026)

Michigan Compiled Laws

§ 780.621gSetting aside certain convictions without application; requirements; exceptions; implementation date; reinstatement; "crime of dishonesty" definedIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) Beginning 2 years after the effective date of the amendatory act that added this section and subject to any necessary appropriation, a misdemeanor conviction for an offense for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for not more than 92 days is set aside under this section without the filing of an application under section 1 if 7 years have passed from the imposition of the sentence. Each court shall notify the arresting law enforcement agency of each conviction on or before the tenth day of each month that is set aside under this subsection for the preceding month. Each law enforcement agency need not retain and shall make nonpublic the notification that the conviction has been set aside, and the record of the arrest, fingerprinting, conviction, and sentence of the person in the case to which the notification applies.

Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-30 · Read the full section at legislature.mi.gov

Cited in 3 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025

Leading cases: People of Michigan v. Christopher Shane Babcock (Michigan Court of Appeals 2025) · People of Michigan v. Jeffrey Duane Tull (Michigan Court of Appeals 2024) · People of Michigan v. Monica Rannay Pulliam (Michigan Court of Appeals 2024)

Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.

Also relied on in: Michigan Expungement Laws: How Conviction Set-Aside Works Under MCL 780.621, Expungement Laws by State: How to Clear Your Record (2026)

Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal

Sources and References

  1. California Penal Code section 851.8 (petition for a finding of factual innocence)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  2. D.C. Code section 22-4135 (motion to vacate on grounds of actual innocence)(code.dccouncil.gov).gov
  3. 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b), Fair Credit Reporting Act accuracy requirement(govinfo.gov).gov
  4. 15 U.S.C. 1681i, procedure in case of disputed accuracy(govinfo.gov).gov
  5. LawHelp.org, nonprofit legal-aid directory from Pro Bono Net(lawhelp.org)
  6. Michigan Compiled Laws 780.621g, setting aside convictions without an application(legislature.mi.gov).gov
  7. Michigan Attorney General, Expungement Assistance (Clean Slate timing, limits, and excluded offenses)(michigan.gov).gov
  8. California Penal Code section 1203.4, dismissal relief and its excluded offenses(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
  9. Florida Statutes section 435.04, level 2 screening standards(leg.state.fl.us).gov
  10. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, agencies entitled to sealed and expunged records(fdle.state.fl.us).gov
  11. 5 U.S.C. 552, Freedom of Information Act(govinfo.gov).gov
Share: