Washington
Washington Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Washington treats teen sexting as a distinct legal category. Under , a minor who shares sexually explicit images of a peer age 13 or older faces a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor rather than a felony. Adults who deal in or possess such images face Class B felony charges under separate statutes.
Overview of Washington Sexting Laws
Washington's legal framework for sexting cases reflects a nuanced understanding that adolescent behavior differs fundamentally from adult exploitation. The legislature has enacted specific provisions under RCW 9.68A.053 that create separate, less severe offenses for minors who share sexually explicit images with peers. This approach aims to hold teenagers accountable without branding them as sex offenders or imposing felony convictions that could follow them for life.
The Washington statutory scheme considers several key factors when determining appropriate charges:
- Age of the offender: Whether the person is under 18 or an adult
- Age of the person depicted: Whether the subject is 13 or older versus 12 or younger
- Nature of the conduct depicted: The type of sexually explicit activity shown
- Intent and distribution: Whether images were shared for profit, to cause harm, or consensually
- Self-produced images: Special exemptions for minors possessing their own images
Teen Sexting Statute (RCW 9.68A.053)
RCW 9.68A.053, titled "Sexually explicit images: Crimes by minors: Penalties," establishes separate offenses for minors who distribute sexually explicit images of other minors. This statute creates a critical distinction based on the age of the depicted minor.

Offenses Involving Minors Age 13 and Older
When a person under 18 distributes images of another minor who is 13 years of age or older, the penalties are significantly reduced from standard child pornography charges:
- First Degree: Distributing images depicting sexually explicit conduct as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8)(a) through (e), which includes sexual intercourse, penetration, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, and certain excretory conduct. This offense is classified as a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to 364 days in jail and a $5,000 fine.
- Second Degree: Distributing images depicting conduct defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8)(f) or (g), which includes depiction of genitals or breast areas for sexual stimulation, or touching for sexual stimulation. This offense is classified as a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine.
Offenses Involving Minors Age 12 and Younger
When a minor distributes images depicting a child 12 years of age or younger, the penalties increase dramatically:
- First Degree: Dealing in depictions of a minor 12 or younger, involving conduct under RCW 9.68A.011(8)(a) through (e), is a Class B felony punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment and $20,000 fine.
- Second Degree: Dealing in depictions of a minor 12 or younger, involving conduct under RCW 9.68A.011(8)(f) or (g), is also a Class B felony.
Self-Produced Images Exemption
Critically, RCW 9.68A.053(6) provides an important exemption: the statute does not apply to a person under 18 who "finances, attempts to finance, develops, duplicates, publishes, prints, disseminates, exchanges, or possesses a visual or printed matter that depicts himself or herself engaged in an act of sexually explicit conduct." This means a minor cannot be charged under this section for possessing or sharing images of themselves, though other consequences may still apply.
However, if a minor sells images depicting themselves, they can be charged with a misdemeanor under (5).
Dealing in Depictions of Minor (RCW 9.68A.050)
RCW 9.68A.050 establishes the primary offense for adults who deal in child sexual abuse material. A person 18 years of age or older commits this offense when they knowingly develop, duplicate, publish, print, disseminate, exchange, finance, or sell visual matter depicting a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
First Degree (Class B Felony)
Dealing in depictions in the first degree applies when the sexually explicit conduct depicted falls under RCW 9.68A.011(8)(a) through (e). This includes:
- Sexual intercourse of any type
- Penetration by any object
- Masturbation
- Sadomasochistic abuse
- Excretory conduct for sexual stimulation
This offense is a Class B felony punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment and a $20,000 fine. Each individual image constitutes a separate offense for prosecution purposes.
Second Degree (Class B Felony)
Dealing in depictions in the second degree applies to images depicting conduct under RCW 9.68A.011(8)(f) or (g), including depiction of genitals or touching for sexual stimulation. This offense is also a Class B felony. For second degree offenses, each incident of dealing, rather than each individual image, constitutes a separate offense.
Possession of Depictions (RCW 9.68A.070)
RCW 9.68A.070 addresses knowing possession of sexually explicit images of minors. Like the dealing statute, possession offenses are divided into first and second degree based on the nature of the depicted conduct.

Adult Possession
Both first and second degree possession offenses are Class B felonies for adults, punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment and $20,000 fine. For first degree offenses, each image is a separate offense. For second degree offenses, each incident of possession constitutes a separate offense.
Important Exceptions for Minors
The possession statute contains two critical exceptions that specifically address teen sexting situations:
- RCW 9.68A.070(3): The possession statute does not apply to a minor's possession of visual matter depicting any minor 13 years of age or older engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
- RCW 9.68A.070(4): The statute does not apply to a person under 13 years of age in possession of visual matter depicting himself or herself engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
These exceptions mean that a 16-year-old who receives a sexually explicit image from a 15-year-old peer cannot be charged under the standard possession statute. However, distribution could still result in charges under RCW 9.68A.053.
Sexual Exploitation of Minor (RCW 9.68A.040)
Under RCW 9.68A.040, sexual exploitation of a minor occurs when a person:
- Compels a minor by threat or force to engage in sexually explicit conduct, knowing it will be photographed or recorded
- Aids, invites, employs, authorizes, or causes a minor to engage in such conduct
- Being a parent, guardian, or custodian, permits the minor to engage in such conduct
This offense is a Class B felony. This statute would apply in coercion situations, such as when someone pressures or forces a minor to create and send sexually explicit images.
Communication for Immoral Purposes (RCW 9.68A.090)
RCW 9.68A.090 addresses communications with minors for immoral purposes, including solicitation of sexual images. This statute is often charged alongside sexting offenses when an adult solicits images from a minor.
- First Offense: A gross misdemeanor punishable by up to 364 days in jail and $5,000 fine
- Subsequent Offense or Electronic Communication: A Class C felony punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment and $10,000 fine
The statute specifically provides that communication via electronic means, such as text messages, social media, or email, elevates the first offense to a Class C felony. This provision is particularly relevant to sexting cases.
Revenge Porn (RCW 9A.86.010)
Washington has enacted a separate statute addressing non-consensual disclosure of intimate images, commonly known as "revenge porn." Under RCW 9A.86.010, a person commits this offense by knowingly disclosing an intimate image when:

- The image was obtained under circumstances where a reasonable person would understand it was to remain private
- The person knows or should know the depicted person has not consented to disclosure
- The person knows or should know disclosure would cause harm
Penalties
- First Offense: Gross misdemeanor, up to 364 days in jail and $5,000 fine
- Subsequent Offense: Class C felony, up to 5 years imprisonment and $10,000 fine
Special Provisions for Minors
Notably, RCW 9A.86.010(2) creates a higher standard for prosecuting minors. A person under 18 is not guilty of disclosing intimate images unless the person "intentionally and maliciously disclosed an intimate image of another person." This heightened intent requirement provides additional protection for teenagers who may share images without fully understanding the consequences.
Penalty Chart
| Offense | RCW Citation | Classification | Maximum Imprisonment | Maximum Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minor Dealing (peer 13+, 1st degree) | 9.68A.053(1)(a) | Gross Misdemeanor | 364 days | $5,000 |
| Minor Dealing (peer 13+, 2nd degree) | 9.68A.053(1)(b) | Misdemeanor | 90 days | $1,000 |
| Minor Dealing (child 12 or under) | 9.68A.053(2)-(3) | Class B Felony | 10 years | $20,000 |
| Minor Selling Own Images | 9.68A.053(5) | Misdemeanor | 90 days | $1,000 |
| Adult Dealing (1st or 2nd degree) | 9.68A.050 | Class B Felony | 10 years | $20,000 |
| Adult Possession (1st or 2nd degree) | 9.68A.070 | Class B Felony | 10 years | $20,000 |
| Sexual Exploitation of Minor | 9.68A.040 | Class B Felony | 10 years | $20,000 |
| Communication for Immoral Purposes (1st) | 9.68A.090(1) | Gross Misdemeanor | 364 days | $5,000 |
| Communication for Immoral Purposes (electronic/repeat) | 9.68A.090(2) | Class C Felony | 5 years | $10,000 |
| Revenge Porn (1st offense) | 9A.86.010(7)(a) | Gross Misdemeanor | 364 days | $5,000 |
| Revenge Porn (subsequent) | 9A.86.010(7)(b) | Class C Felony | 5 years | $10,000 |
Defenses and Exceptions
Statutory Exceptions
Washington law provides several statutory exceptions that may serve as complete defenses:
- Self-Depiction Exemption: Under RCW 9.68A.053(6), a minor cannot be charged for possessing or sharing images depicting only themselves, unless they sell those images.
- Minor Possession Exemption: Under RCW 9.68A.070(3), the possession statute does not apply to a minor possessing images of another minor age 13 or older.
- Young Child Self-Possession: Under RCW 9.68A.070(4), a child under 13 cannot be charged for possessing images of themselves.
Affirmative Defenses
- Knowledge of the Depicted Person's Age: Most offenses require "knowing" possession or distribution, but not knowing the depicted person's age is not a defense. Under RCW 9.68A.110(2), which governs prosecutions under RCW 9.68A.050, 9.68A.053, and 9.68A.070 among others, "it is not a defense that the defendant did not know the age of the child depicted in the visual or printed matter." The statute supplies one narrow alternative, and the defendant must prove it by a preponderance of the evidence: "that at the time of the offense the defendant was not in possession of any facts on the basis of which he or she should reasonably have known that the person depicted was a minor." That standard turns on what the defendant should reasonably have known, not on what the defendant actually knew.
- Public Interest Disclosure: Under RCW 9A.86.010(3)(b), disclosures made in the public interest, including reporting unlawful conduct or lawful law enforcement practices, are exempt from revenge porn charges.
- Family Member Defense: Under RCW 9A.86.010(5), it is an affirmative defense to a revenge porn charge that the defendant "is a family member of a minor and did not intend any harm or harassment in disclosing the images of the minor to other family or friends of the defendant." The same subsection limits it: "This affirmative defense shall not apply to matters defined under RCW 9.68A.011." That carve-out means the defense does not reach child sexual abuse material, which is the conduct most teen sexting prosecutions involve.
Prompt Deletion
While not a statutory defense, evidence that a person immediately deleted unsolicited images upon receipt may support a defense against possession charges by demonstrating lack of knowing possession or lack of intent to retain.
Juvenile Diversion and Treatment Programs
Washington provides several alternatives to traditional prosecution for juvenile sex offenders, including those charged with sexting-related offenses.
Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative (SSODA)
Under RCW 13.40.162, juvenile offenders may be eligible for the Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative when:
- The offender committed a sex offense that is not also classified as a serious violent offense
- The offender has no history of prior sex offenses
Under SSODA, the court may suspend execution of the standard disposition and place the offender on community supervision for at least two years. Conditions may include:
- Outpatient sex offender treatment for up to two years
- Up to 30 days of confinement
- Educational and employment requirements
- Geographic restrictions
- Regular reporting to probation
- Community service
- Restitution to victims
The treatment provider must submit quarterly progress reports to the court. If the offender violates conditions or fails to make satisfactory progress, the court may revoke the suspension and impose the original disposition.
Benefits of SSODA
Successfully completing SSODA provides significant benefits for juvenile offenders:
- Avoiding Sex Offender Registration: Under RCW 9A.44.130(1)(b), juveniles who receive and complete SSODA are generally not required to register as sex offenders.
- Rehabilitation Focus: The program emphasizes treatment and rehabilitation rather than punishment.
- Record Sealing: Juvenile records may be eligible for sealing upon reaching adulthood.
Juvenile Court Diversion
For less serious sexting offenses, such as misdemeanor-level violations, prosecutors may offer diversion agreements that allow juveniles to avoid formal charges entirely. Diversion programs typically require:
- Educational programs about digital citizenship and consequences
- Counseling
- Community service
- Parental involvement
- Agreement to refrain from similar conduct
Sex Offender Registration
Sex offender registration in Washington is governed by RCW 9A.44.130. The statute creates different requirements for adults and juveniles.
Adult Registration Requirements
Adults convicted of sex offenses under RCW Chapter 9.68A, including dealing in or possessing depictions of minors, are generally required to register as sex offenders. Registration involves providing personal information, photographs, and fingerprints to the county sheriff, and complying with ongoing reporting requirements.
Juvenile Registration Requirements
For juvenile offenders, registration is not automatic and applies only in specific circumstances outlined in RCW 9A.44.130(1)(b):
- The juvenile committed a Class A or Class B sex offense at age 16 or 17 and did not receive SSODA
- The juvenile committed rape in the first degree at age 14 or 15
- The juvenile committed rape in the second degree at age 14 or 15 and did not receive SSODA
- The juvenile had a prior sex offense conviction or deferred disposition
- The juvenile had SSODA revoked for certain offenses
- The court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that registration is necessary to address a serious threat to public safety
For typical teen sexting offenses charged as misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors under RCW 9.68A.053, sex offender registration is not required because these offenses are not classified as Class A or Class B felonies.
Duration of Registration
When registration is required, the duration depends on the offense classification and the offender's risk level as determined by the court or the End of Sentence Review Committee.
Recent Legislative Changes
Washington has updated its sexual exploitation laws in recent years to address emerging concerns:
AI-Generated and Digitized Imagery
The legislature amended RCW 9.68A.011 to address artificial intelligence and digitally altered images. The definitions now include:
- Digitization: Creating or altering visual matter to depict an identifiable minor utilizing images of another person or computer-generated images, including through artificial intelligence
- Fabricated Depiction: Visual matter depicting an identifiable minor that was created or altered by digitization to show the minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct in which they did not actually engage
These amendments ensure that AI-generated "deepfakes" and other synthetic imagery depicting identifiable minors are covered under existing criminal statutes.
Enhanced Electronic Communication Penalties
The legislature enhanced penalties for communication with a minor for immoral purposes when conducted via electronic means, recognizing the increased risk posed by digital communications.
Federal Take It Down Act (2025)
The federal Take It Down Act (P.L. 119-12, signed May 19, 2025, codified at (h)) makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish a nonconsensual intimate image, or in some cases to threaten to do so. A threat involving a digital forgery carries up to 18 months in prison (30 months if the victim is a minor); threatening to publish an authentic image is punished more severely, up to the full 2 years for an adult victim or 3 years for a minor victim. Covered platforms must also remove a reported image within 48 hours, a duty that became operative in 2026. This federal law applies alongside , 2252, and 2252A, which independently criminalize child sexual abuse material regardless of state law, and the 2022 civil remedy at .
More Washington Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a teenager be charged with child pornography for sending nude photos in Washington?
Yes, but Washington has created reduced charges specifically for teen sexting. Under RCW 9.68A.053, a minor who shares sexually explicit images of another minor age 13 or older faces misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor charges rather than felony child pornography charges. However, if the images depict a child 12 or younger, felony charges apply regardless of the offender's age.
Will my teenager have to register as a sex offender for sexting?
For most teen sexting offenses, no. Sex offender registration under RCW 9A.44.130 is generally not required for misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offenses. Registration requirements for juveniles are limited to Class A or Class B sex offenses committed at specific ages, and even then, completing the Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative (SSODA) typically eliminates the registration requirement.
Is it illegal to possess nude photos of myself that I took when I was underage?
The statute contains an exception that may apply. Under RCW 9.68A.053(6), the teen sexting statute does not apply to a minor possessing images depicting themselves. Additionally, RCW 9.68A.070(3)-(4) contains exemptions for minors possessing images of themselves or peers. However, these exceptions apply to minors. Once you turn 18, possessing sexually explicit images of any minor, including your younger self, could potentially be charged. The safest course is to delete such images.
What should I do if I receive an unsolicited nude image of a minor?
Delete it immediately. Do not forward it to anyone, including law enforcement. If you believe a minor is being exploited or abused, report the situation to local police or the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's CyberTipline (CyberTipline.org), but explain that you deleted the image upon receipt. Evidence of prompt deletion can help demonstrate you did not knowingly possess the image.
Can I sue someone who shared my intimate images without consent?
Yes. In addition to criminal penalties under RCW 9A.86.010, Washington law allows victims of non-consensual image sharing to pursue civil remedies. You may be able to recover damages for emotional distress, reputational harm, and other injuries. The statute specifically provides that criminal prosecution does not limit civil remedies.
What is the difference between first and second degree offenses?
The degree of offense depends on the type of sexually explicit conduct depicted. First degree offenses involve images depicting sexual intercourse, penetration, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, or excretory conduct for sexual stimulation as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8)(a) through (e). Second degree offenses involve images depicting genitals, pubic areas, or breast areas for sexual stimulation, or touching for sexual stimulation, as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8)(f) or (g). First degree offenses carry more severe penalties.
Can an adult be charged for sexting with a 17-year-old who consents?
Yes. While Washington's age of consent for sexual activity is 16, the law prohibits sexually explicit images of any person under 18 regardless of consent. An adult who solicits, receives, or possesses sexually explicit images of a 17-year-old can face felony charges under RCW 9.68A, even if the 17-year-old willingly sent the images. The minor's consent is not a defense to child pornography charges.
Updates
Corrected the defenses section: Washington law bars a defense based on not knowing the depicted person’s age, and the revenge porn family member defense does not apply to child sexual abuse material.
Corrected eight citations to Washington's 'sexually explicit conduct' definition from RCW 9.68A.011(7) to the correct subsection (8) (subsection (7) defines 'photograph,' an unrelated term), and added a short new section on the federal Take It Down Act (2025), which the page previously omitted entirely.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Revised Code of Washington
§ 9.68A.053Sexually explicit images—Crimes by minors—Penalties.In force
(1)(a)(i) A person under the age of 18 commits the crime of a minor dealing in depictions of another minor 13 years of age or older engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree when he or she knowingly distributes, publishes, transfers, disseminates, or exchanges a visual or printed matter that depicts another minor 13 years of age or older engaged in an act of sexually explicit conduct as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8) (a) through (e). (ii) Minor dealing in depictions of another minor 13 years of age or older engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the first degree is a gross misdemeanor. (b)(i) A person under the age of 18 commits the crime of a minor dealing in depictions of another minor 13 years of age or older engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the second degree when he or she knowingly distributes, publishes, transfers, disseminates, or exchanges a visual or printed matter that depicts another minor 13 years of age or older engaged in an act of sexually explicit conduct as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8) (f) or (g).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
§ 13.40.162Special sex offender disposition alternative.In force
(1) A juvenile offender is eligible for the special sex offender disposition alternative when: (a) The offender is found to have committed a sex offense, other than a sex offense that is also a serious violent offense as defined by RCW 9.94A.030, and the offender has no history of a prior sex offense; or (b) The offender is found to have committed assault in the fourth degree with sexual motivation, and the offender has no history of a prior sex offense. (2) If the court finds the offender is eligible for this alternative, the court, on its own motion or the motion of the state or the respondent, may order an examination to determine whether the respondent is amenable to treatment. (a) The report of the examination shall include at a minimum the following: (i) The respondent's version of the facts and the official version of the facts; (ii) The respondent's offense history; (iii) An assessment of problems in addition to alleged deviant behaviors; (iv) The respondent's social, educational, and employment situation; (v) Other evaluation measures used. The report shall set forth the sources of the evaluator's information.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at app.leg.wa.gov
Cited in 21 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- State v. Sanchez (Washington Supreme Court 2013, 177 Wash. 2d 835)“…special sex offender disposition alternative (SSODA). See RCW 13.40.162. If a juvenile is SSODA eligible, the c…”
- State v. T.J.S.-M. (Washington Supreme Court 2019, 441 P.3d 1181)“…The Court of Appeals dismissed T.J.S.-M.'s appeal based on RCW 13.40.162 and State v. J.B., 102 Wn. App. 583, 9…”
- State v. A.G.S. (Washington Supreme Court 2014, 182 Wash. 2d 273)“…l sex offender disposition alternative (SSODA) evaluation, RCW 13.40.162-should be filed in the official juvenil…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
United States Code Title 47
§ 223Obscene or harassing telephone calls in the District of Columbia or in interstate or foreign communicationsIn forcecited in 13 of our articles
Whoever— in interstate or foreign communications— by means of a telecommunications device knowingly— makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass another person; by means of a telecommunications device knowingly— makes, creates, or solicits, and initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication; makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass any specific person; makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or makes repeated telephone calls or repeatedly initiates communication with a telecommunications device,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 208 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Sable Communications v. FCC (1989) upheld the 47 U.S.C. 223(b) ban on obscene commercial phone messages but struck its indecency ban as not narrowly tailored. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) held the CDA's 223(a) indecency and 223(d) display provisions violate the First Amendment, severing only the words "or indecent".
Leading cases:
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (Supreme Court of the United States 1997, 521 U.S. 844)✓Online speakers challenged the Communications Decency Act's bans on indecent transmissions to minors and patently offensive displays. The Court held 47 U.S.C. 223(a) and 223(d) facially violate the First Amendment, severing only the words "or indecent" from section 223(a).
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 2000, 529 U.S. 803)“…suant to § 561 of the Act, 110 Stat. 142 , note following 47 U. S. C. § 223 (1994 ed., Supp. III). Playboy sought…”
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation (Supreme Court of the United States 1978, 438 U.S. 726)“…ous, filthy, or indecent" telephone calls, 82 Stat. 112 , 47 U. S. C. § 223 , the FCC itself indicated that it thou…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: What Is the Take It Down Act? The 2025 Federal NCII Law Explained, How to File a Take It Down Request (Step by Step), Louisiana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
United States Code Title 15
§ 6851Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate imagesIn forcecited in 24 of our articles
In this section: The term “commercial pornographic content” means any material that is subject to the record keeping requirements under section 2257 of title 18. The term “consent” means an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization made by the individual free from force, fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. The term “depicted individual” means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction and who is identifiable by virtue of the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the visual depiction. The term “disclose” means to transfer, publish, distribute, or make accessible.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 49 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):District courts have begun applying the 15 U.S.C. 6851 private action for nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. Goodnight v. Hammons (2025) read its unwelcome conduct and public concern exceptions narrowly and let the claim proceed. Parkes v. Walker II (2025) dismissed a claim that did not plead interstate commerce.
Leading cases:
- TILLE v. KAPLAN (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)“…iolence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2022 (“VAWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6851. Compl., D.E. 1, at 7-8. The allegati…”
- Turner v. Echols (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025)✓A pretrial detainee sued an FBI agent under 15 U.S.C. 6851 over intimate images found in a warrantless phone search; the court dismissed, finding he never alleged he was depicted, never plausibly alleged disclosure, and that the law enforcement exception applied.
- Goodnight v. Hammons (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2025)✓A wife allegedly accessed her husband's devices, took his girlfriend's nude photos and sent them to a coworker; the court let the 15 U.S.C. 6851 claim proceed, rejecting the statute's unwelcome-conduct and public-concern exceptions as covering discovered infidelity.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), Revenge Porn Laws by State: All 50 States and DC (2026), Mississippi Data Privacy Laws: Breach Notification & Consumer Rights (2026)
United States Code Title 18
§ 2251Sexual exploitation of childrenIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Any person who employs, uses, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any minor to engage in, or who has a minor assist any other person to engage in, or who transports any minor in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, with the intent that such minor engage in, any sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct or for the purpose of transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct, shall be punished as provided under subsection (e), if such person knows or has reason to know that such visual depiction will be transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed, if that visual depiction was produced or transmitted using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or if such visual depiction has actually been transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or mailed.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 2,812 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- United States v. Irey (Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2010, 612 F.3d 1160)“…iled on December 13, 2006, Irey was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (c). The indictment alleged that he “di…”
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (Supreme Court of the United States 2002, 535 U.S. 234)“…ether the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), 18 U. S. C. § 2251 et seq., abridges the freedom of sp…”
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…But as in the criminalization of pornography production at 18 U. S. C. § 2251 , see infra, at 76, n. 5, the perpetr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kentucky Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Offenses, Penalties, and Protections, Delaware Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Privacy Protections (2026), Montana Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Washington State Bar Association: Find Legal Help(wsba.org)
- Northwest Justice Project(nwjustice.org)
- RCW Chapter 9.68A: Sexual Exploitation of Children(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW Chapter 9A.86: Disclosing Intimate Images(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- RCW 13.40.162: Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- CyberTipline (National Center for Missing & Exploited Children)(missingkids.org)
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)(reportcyber.ic3.gov).gov
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative(cybercivilrights.org)
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: Resources for Families(ncmec.org)
- RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network)(rainn.org)
- Congressional Research Service: The Take It Down Act(congress.gov).gov
- RCW 9.68A.110: Certain defenses barred, permitted(leg.wa.gov)