EnglishEspañol
Washington flag

Washington

Washington Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties

Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Washington Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a teenager be charged with child pornography for sending nude photos in Washington?

Yes, but Washington has created reduced charges specifically for teen sexting. Under RCW 9.68A.053, a minor who shares sexually explicit images of another minor age 13 or older faces misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor charges rather than felony child pornography charges. However, if the images depict a child 12 or younger, felony charges apply regardless of the offender's age.

Will my teenager have to register as a sex offender for sexting?

For most teen sexting offenses, no. Sex offender registration under RCW 9A.44.130 is generally not required for misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offenses. Registration requirements for juveniles are limited to Class A or Class B sex offenses committed at specific ages, and even then, completing the Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative (SSODA) typically eliminates the registration requirement.

Is it illegal to possess nude photos of myself that I took when I was underage?

The statute contains an exception that may apply. Under RCW 9.68A.053(6), the teen sexting statute does not apply to a minor possessing images depicting themselves. Additionally, RCW 9.68A.070(3)-(4) contains exemptions for minors possessing images of themselves or peers. However, these exceptions apply to minors. Once you turn 18, possessing sexually explicit images of any minor, including your younger self, could potentially be charged. The safest course is to delete such images.

What should I do if I receive an unsolicited nude image of a minor?

Delete it immediately. Do not forward it to anyone, including law enforcement. If you believe a minor is being exploited or abused, report the situation to local police or the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's CyberTipline (CyberTipline.org), but explain that you deleted the image upon receipt. Evidence of prompt deletion can help demonstrate you did not knowingly possess the image.

Can I sue someone who shared my intimate images without consent?

Yes. In addition to criminal penalties under RCW 9A.86.010, Washington law allows victims of non-consensual image sharing to pursue civil remedies. You may be able to recover damages for emotional distress, reputational harm, and other injuries. The statute specifically provides that criminal prosecution does not limit civil remedies.

What is the difference between first and second degree offenses?

The degree of offense depends on the type of sexually explicit conduct depicted. First degree offenses involve images depicting sexual intercourse, penetration, masturbation, sadomasochistic abuse, or excretory conduct for sexual stimulation as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8)(a) through (e). Second degree offenses involve images depicting genitals, pubic areas, or breast areas for sexual stimulation, or touching for sexual stimulation, as defined in RCW 9.68A.011(8)(f) or (g). First degree offenses carry more severe penalties.

Can an adult be charged for sexting with a 17-year-old who consents?

Yes. While Washington's age of consent for sexual activity is 16, the law prohibits sexually explicit images of any person under 18 regardless of consent. An adult who solicits, receives, or possesses sexually explicit images of a 17-year-old can face felony charges under RCW 9.68A, even if the 17-year-old willingly sent the images. The minor's consent is not a defense to child pornography charges.

Updates

Corrected the defenses section: Washington law bars a defense based on not knowing the depicted person’s age, and the revenge porn family member defense does not apply to child sexual abuse material.

Corrected eight citations to Washington's 'sexually explicit conduct' definition from RCW 9.68A.011(7) to the correct subsection (8) (subsection (7) defines 'photograph,' an unrelated term), and added a short new section on the federal Take It Down Act (2025), which the page previously omitted entirely.

Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes

Governing law re-checked for recent changes

Reviewed and approved by an editor

Sources and References

  1. Washington State Bar Association: Find Legal Help(wsba.org)
  2. Northwest Justice Project(nwjustice.org)
  3. RCW Chapter 9.68A: Sexual Exploitation of Children(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
  4. RCW Chapter 9A.86: Disclosing Intimate Images(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
  5. RCW 13.40.162: Special Sex Offender Disposition Alternative(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
  6. CyberTipline (National Center for Missing & Exploited Children)(missingkids.org)
  7. FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)(reportcyber.ic3.gov).gov
  8. Cyber Civil Rights Initiative(cybercivilrights.org)
  9. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: Resources for Families(ncmec.org)
  10. RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network)(rainn.org)
  11. Congressional Research Service: The Take It Down Act(congress.gov).gov
  12. RCW 9.68A.110: Certain defenses barred, permitted(leg.wa.gov)
Share: