Mississippi
Mississippi Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 5 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Mississippi has no dedicated teen-sexting law; minors who send or receive explicit images are charged under , the state's child exploitation statute. That means a 16-year-old sexting a peer faces the same felony child pornography charges as an adult predator.
The "Teen Sexting" Gap: No Safe Harbor
The most critical aspect of Mississippi law for parents and teenagers to understand is the absence of a "Romeo and Juliet" exception for sexting. While many states have enacted laws that treat consensual sexting between close-in-age minors as a misdemeanor or a civil infraction, Mississippi code makes no such distinction.

Legally, a 16-year-old who takes a nude selfie and sends it to their 16-year-old partner has committed two potential felonies:
- Production of Child Pornography: By taking the photo, they have "produced" visual material depicting a minor (themselves) engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
- Distribution of Child Pornography: By pressing send, they have "distributed" that material.
The recipient, by saving the image, commits the felony of Possession of Child Pornography. While prosecutors may use discretion in charging these cases, the letter of the law exposes teenagers to mandatory minimum prison sentences and sex offender registration. In some jurisdictions, prosecutors may choose to divert these cases to juvenile court, but this is not guaranteed by statute.
Child Exploitation & Pornography (§ 97-5-33)
The core statute governing these offenses is Miss. Code Ann. § 97-5-33, titled "Exploitation of children; prohibitions." This sweeping law covers the production, distribution, and solicitation of explicit materials involving minors.
Prohibited Acts
Under this statute, it is a crime to knowingly:
- Cause, solicit, or permit any child (under 18) to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction.
- Photograph, film, or record a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
- Send, transport, or receive any visual depiction of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
- Entice, coerce, or solicit a child to produce such material (often called "sextortion").
Grooming conduct that never results in an image is charged separately, under Miss. Code Ann. § 97-5-32, described below.
Definition of "Sexually Explicit Conduct"
Defined in § 97-5-31, this includes not only sexual intercourse but also:
- Lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area.
- Masturbation.
- Erotic touching of genitals, buttocks, or breasts.
This broad definition encompasses virtually all forms of "nudes" or "sexts," regardless of whether the intent was artistic, romantic, or pornographic. The term "lascivious exhibition" is key here; it means that a photo does not need to show a sexual act to be illegal,simple nudity that is deemed lewd can qualify.
Grooming of a Child (§ 97-5-32)
Mississippi created a dedicated grooming offense in 2025. House Bill 1308 codified Miss. Code Ann. § 97-5-32, effective July 1, 2025, and it now reaches much of the conduct people describe as "online grooming."
A person over the age of 21 commits the offense by knowingly engaging in a "pattern of conduct or communication," whether in person, through a third party, or through an electronic device, social media or text messages, in order to gain access to, gain the compliance of, prepare, persuade, induce or coerce a child under 16 into sexually explicit conduct, human trafficking or sexual servitude.
Two features matter for sexting cases. The statute says it is not a defense that no sexually explicit conduct ever occurred, so the pattern of communication is itself the crime. And a prosecution under this section does not preclude a separate prosecution under § 97-5-33 for any images that were actually produced or transmitted.
| Offense | Prison Time | Fine |
|---|---|---|
| Base offense | 2 to 10 years | Up to $10,000 |
| Offender 18 or older in a position of trust or authority | 5 to 10 years | Up to $20,000 |
| Subsequent offense, or a first offense by a registered sex offender | 10 to 20 years | Up to $30,000 |
Note: each tier is written as prison "or" a fine "or both," so a court may impose the prison term, the fine, or both. A "position of trust or authority" expressly includes a teacher, counselor, physician, minister, legal guardian, parent, stepparent, scout leader or coach.
Federal Law Intersection
It is crucial to remember that the internet is a cross-border medium. Once an image is sent via the internet (social media, text, email), it likely crosses state lines, triggering federal jurisdiction. Federal child pornography laws () carry severe mandatory minimum sentences (often 5 to 15 years in federal prison).
While federal prosecutors often reserve these charges for large-scale predators, the dual sovereignty doctrine means a person can theoretically be charged in both state and federal court for the same act. In sexting cases, local law enforcement often works with Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) task forces, which include federal agents.
Congress also passed the TAKE IT DOWN Act (Public Law 119-12) in 2025, creating a federal criminal offense for publishing or threatening to publish a nonconsensual intimate image, including an AI-generated deepfake. Threatening to publish an authentic image, the classic sextortion scenario, carries up to 2 years in federal prison for an adult victim or up to 3 years for a minor victim; a threat involving a digital forgery carries a separate, lower penalty of up to 18 months (adult) or 30 months (minor). A related federal civil law, , lets a victim sue for at least $150,000 in liquidated damages plus attorney's fees.
Possession of Explicit Images
Mere possession of images depicting minors is also a severe crime under § 97-5-33(5). The law states that no person shall knowingly possess or access with intent to view any visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
Distribution:
Mississippi does not grade these offenses by "intent to distribute." Under § 97-5-35, a single penalty applies to any person who violates "any provision of Section 97-5-33," so simple possession under subsection (5) and sending, transporting or receiving under subsection (4) carry the identical range: 5 to 40 years and a fine of $50,000 to $500,000 on a first offense.
Distribution still matters, because it is a separate prohibited act that can be charged alongside possession. In the digital age, forwarding an image to a group chat or saving it to a shared cloud folder can be treated as distribution, and even "showing" the image on one's phone screen to another person can constitute distribution.
Revenge Porn & Non-Consensual Disclosure
In 2021, Mississippi enacted Senate Bill 2121, codified at Miss. Code Ann. § 97-29-64.1, specifically addressing "revenge porn." This law criminalizes the disclosure of intimate visual material without the depicted person's consent.
Elements of the Crime
A person commits an offense only if all of the following are true, not just some of them:
- They disclose visual material of another person with intimate parts exposed or engaged in sexual conduct.
- They act without the effective consent of the depicted person.
- They act with the intent to harm the depicted person.
- They know or have reason to believe the material was obtained or created under circumstances where the depicted person had a reasonable expectation that it would remain private.
- The disclosure causes harm to the depicted person.
- The disclosure reveals the identity of the depicted person in any manner, including through accompanying or subsequent information, or through material a third party supplies in response to the disclosure.
Defenses
The law provides affirmative defenses if the disclosure was made in the course of:
- Lawful law enforcement or medical practices.
- Reporting unlawful activity.
- Legal proceedings where required by law.
- Situations where the person voluntarily exposed themselves in a public or commercial setting.
Civil Liability & Parental Responsibility
Beyond criminal charges, sexting can lead to significant financial liability through civil lawsuits. Victims of non-consensual image sharing can sue for damages.
Torts: Emotional Distress and Privacy
Victims may sue under common law tort theories such as:
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): Proving the conduct was extreme and outrageous and caused severe emotional suffering.
- Invasion of Privacy (Public Disclosure of Private Facts): Sharing private, embarrassing information that is not of public concern.
- Invasion of Privacy (Intrusion upon Seclusion): The act of taking the photo or accessing private files without permission.
Parental Liability (§ 93-13-2)
Parents in Mississippi can be held financially liable for the malicious acts of their children. Under Miss. Code § 93-13-2, property owners can recover up to $5,000 plus court costs from the parents of a minor (ages 10-17) who maliciously or willfully damages or destroys property. While this statute focuses on property, the principles of Negligent Supervision can expose parents to unlimited liability in personal injury lawsuits if they knew their child had a propensity for harmful behavior (e.g., a history of cyberbullying) and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it.
Additionally, under the juvenile justice code (§ 43-21-619), a judge can order parents to pay restitution for damages caused by their delinquent child.
School Discipline & Expulsion
Schools in Mississippi have broad authority to discipline students for conduct that disrupts the educational environment, even if the conduct occurs off-campus. This is known as the "nexus" rule.
If a sexting incident involves students from the same school, or if the images are shared during school hours or on school devices, the school can impose severe sanctions:
- Suspension or Expulsion: Local school boards often have zero-tolerance policies for "immoral conduct" or electronic harassment.
- Athletic Bans: Students may be removed from sports teams or extracurricular activities.
- Alternative School: Students may be sent to alternative disciplinary schools.
Under Mississippi law, acts that involve "moral turpitude" are statutory grounds for suspension or expulsion.
Invasion of Privacy & Peeping Tom Laws
Mississippi also has a "Peeping Tom" statute under § 97-29-63, which criminalizes photographing or filming another person without permission where there is an expectation of privacy.
This law applies to:
- Secretly photographing or filming a person in a private place (like a dressing room, bathroom, or bedroom).
- Doing so with "lewd, licentious or indecent intent."
This statute is often used in cases of "upskirting" or hidden camera voyeurism. If the victim is a child under 16 and the offender is 21 or older, the maximum prison term doubles to up to 10 years, with the same $5,000 fine as the adult-victim offense. This law serves as a catch-all for non-consensual image capture even if the image isn't distributed.
Electronic Harassment & Obscenity
Sexting behavior can sometimes cross into harassment. Miss. Code § 97-29-45 prohibits using a computer or phone to make obscene, lewd, or threatening communications.
This includes:
- Making a comment or suggestion that is "lewd, lascivious, or indecent" with intent to abuse, threaten, or harass.
- Repeatedly contacting someone to harass or molest them.
Penalties escalate with repeat convictions. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $500 or up to 6 months in county jail, or both. A second offense committed within five years carries a fine of up to $1,000 or up to 1 year, or both. A third or subsequent offense within five years is a felony, punishable by a fine of up to $2,000, up to 2 years in the State Penitentiary, or both. These charges can also be stacked with other counts. This is often the charge used for "cyberflashing" (sending unwanted genital images to strangers via AirDrop or DM).
Criminal Penalties & Sentencing
Mississippi's penalties for sex-related offenses involving minors are extremely severe.
Exploitation of Children (§ 97-5-33)
| Offense | Classification | Prison Time | Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Offense | Felony | 5 to 40 years | $50,000 - $500,000 |
| Second Offense | Felony | 20 years to Life | $100,000 - $1,000,000 |
Note: These are mandatory sentencing ranges. The 5-year minimum for a first offense is significant.
Revenge Porn (§ 97-29-64.1)
| Offense | Classification | Jail/Prison Time | Fine |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Offense | Misdemeanor | Up to 6 months | Up to $1,000 |
| Second Offense | Felony | Up to 1 year | Up to $2,000 |
| For Profit | Felony | Up to 1 year | Up to $2,000 |
Sex Offender Registration
Convictions under § 97-5-33 (Child Exploitation/Pornography) trigger mandatory registration on the Mississippi Sex Offender Registry. This is a lifetime consequence that impacts:
- Housing: Restrictions on where you can live (distance from schools/parks).
- Employment: Disqualification from many jobs, especially in education, healthcare, and government.
- Social Stigma: Publicly searchable database status.
Because there is no specific "teen sexting" tier, a minor prosecuted as an adult or a young adult (18-20) convicted of sexting with a minor (16-17) could face the same registration requirements as a predatory offender. Juvenile adjudications may sometimes be sealed, but this depends heavily on the specific disposition of the case and the judge's orders.
More Mississippi Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a "Romeo and Juliet" law for sexting in Mississippi?
No. Mississippi does not have a specific statutory exception for consensual sexting between minors. While prosecutors may exercise discretion, the law technically treats these acts as child pornography production and distribution.
What should I do if my child finds explicit images on their phone?
Do not forward the image to anyone, including yourself or other parents. Forwarding the image constitutes "distribution" under the law. Confiscate the device and consult a lawyer immediately. If you report it to the school or police, be aware that your child could technically be investigated for possession or production.
Can I be charged for revenge porn if I just showed the photo to friends but didn't post it online?
Possibly. The law covers "disclosure," which includes showing, transferring or exhibiting the material, so it does not require posting on the internet. But every element has to be met: the disclosure must be without effective consent and with intent to harm, it must actually cause harm to the depicted person, and it must reveal that person's identity in some way. A showing that identifies no one, or that causes no harm, does not satisfy the statute.
Is sexting between consenting adults legal?
Yes, sexting between consenting adults (18+) is legal. However, sending unsolicited explicit images ("cyberflashing") can be charged as obscenity or harassment under § 97-29-45. Sharing those images later without consent violates the revenge porn law.
Does the revenge porn law cover "deepfakes"?
Not clearly. Miss. Code Ann. § 97-29-64.1 says nothing about computer-generated, artificially created, altered or digitally manipulated images. It defines "visual material" by the medium that carries the image rather than by how the image was made, and "simulated" appears only inside the definition of "sexual conduct," where it describes a simulated sex act performed by a real person. The offense also requires that the depicted person had a reasonable expectation that the material would remain private, which is hard to establish for a wholly synthetic image. The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act does expressly cover digital forgeries, so a Mississippi deepfake case is more likely to be brought under federal law.
Can a minor be charged as an adult for sexting?
Yes. In Mississippi, the age of criminal responsibility can be as low as 13 for certain felonies. While many sexting cases stay in juvenile court, serious charges or repeat offenses can lead to certification as an adult, especially if coercion or younger victims are involved.
Can parents be sued if their child sends sexts?
Yes. Parents can be sued under "negligent supervision" if they knew their child was engaging in harmful online behavior and failed to intervene. Additionally, Mississippi law allows for up to $5,000 in liability for property damage caused by a minor's malicious acts, and courts can order restitution in juvenile cases.
What should you do if you or your child is accused of sexting?
For Parents: Open Dialogue: Have ongoing conversations about digital citizenship. Explain that once a photo is sent, they lose control over it forever. Device Monitoring: Use parental control software to monitor activity, but balance this with trust. Transparency is key,tell your child you are monitoring to keep them safe, not to spy. Understand the Apps: Familiarize yourself with "disappearing" message apps like Snapchat or encrypted apps like Signal/WhatsApp, which are popular for sexting because they give a false sense of security. Lead by Example: Model appropriate digital behavior. Do not share photos of others without their consent.
Updates
Corrected the penalty discussion for child-exploitation offenses (Mississippi sets one sentence for any violation of § 97-5-33, with no separate "intent to distribute" tier), added the full penalty escalation under § 97-29-45, added the state’s new grooming offense § 97-5-32 (effective July 1, 2025), cited the revenge-porn law by its code section § 97-29-64.1 and added its two missing elements (the disclosure must cause harm and must reveal the depicted person’s identity), and corrected the deepfake FAQ, which had wrongly said the state revenge-porn law covers AI-generated images.
Corrected the child-victim enhancement under the Peeping Tom statute (Miss. Code § 97-29-63 doubles the maximum to 10 years, not 5), added the 2025 federal TAKE IT DOWN Act to the federal-law section, and replaced the dead Attorney General citation and six dead scode.ms.gov statute links (a domain that no longer resolves) with live official/Justia sources.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Mississippi Code of 1972 Annotated
§ 97-5-33Exploitation of children; prohibitions.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) No person shall, by any means, including computer, cause, solicit or knowingly permit any child to engage in sexually explicit conduct or in the simulation of sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct. (2) No person shall, by any means, includin
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Cited in 29 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Shaffer v. State (2011) held that section 97-5-33 is violated by soliciting sex from someone the defendant believes is a child even where the decoy was an adult, so an attempt to exploit a child is itself child exploitation. Harris v. State (2013) applied 97-5-33(6) to explicit texts sent to a 14-year-old.
Leading cases:
- Shaffer v. State (Mississippi Supreme Court 2011, 72 So. 3d 1070)✓A man solicited sex online from a twenty-nine-year-old decoy he believed was thirteen and was arrested at the meeting place; the court held solicitation alone violates this statute even when no actual child exists, and reinstated his conviction.
- Harris v. State (Court of Appeals of Mississippi 2013, 107 So. 3d 1075)✓A man texted his girlfriend's fourteen-year-old daughter from down the hall that he wanted to touch her buttocks; the court held a rational jury could find an attempt to entice or solicit her to meet for sexually explicit conduct, and affirmed under this statute.
- Stanley Charles Follett a/k/a Stanley Follett v. State of Mississippi (Court of Appeals of Mississippi 2024)✓Google cybertips led investigators to child sexual abuse images on a password protected laptop in the defendant's bedroom and in his Google account; the court held a rational juror could find knowing possession from ownership, location and password evidence, and affirmed.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Mississippi Pornography Laws (2026): SB 2346 and HB 1126 Explained
United States Code Title 18
§ 2252Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minorsIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
Any person who— knowingly transports or ships using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means including by computer or mails, any visual depiction, if— the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and such visual depiction is of such conduct; knowingly receives, or distributes, any visual depiction using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or that has been mailed, or has been shipped or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, or which contains materials which have been mailed or so shipped or transported, by any means including by computer, or knowingly reproduces any visual depiction for distribution using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or through the mails, if— the producing of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and such visual depiction is of such conduct; either— in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or on any land or building owned by,…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 3,732 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- New York v. Ferber (Supreme Court of the United States 1982, 458 U.S. 747)“…o prohibits dissemination only if the material is obscene. 18 U. S. C. § 2252 (a) (1976 ed., Supp. IV). Two States pr…”
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1994, 513 U.S. 64)“…depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. 18 U. S. C. § 2252 . The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci…”
- Osborne v. Ohio (Supreme Court of the United States 1990, 495 U.S. 103)“…rial for the purpose of sale or distribution for sale. See 18 U. S. C. § 2252 (a) (1982 ed.). But Congress did not…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Alabama Voyeurism Laws: Hidden Cameras, Penalties, and Victim Rights, Nevada Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: NRS 200.604 Penalties (2026), Wisconsin Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Privacy Crimes and Penalties (2026)
United States Code Title 15
§ 6851Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate imagesIn forcecited in 24 of our articles
In this section: The term “commercial pornographic content” means any material that is subject to the record keeping requirements under section 2257 of title 18. The term “consent” means an affirmative, conscious, and voluntary authorization made by the individual free from force, fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. The term “depicted individual” means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction and who is identifiable by virtue of the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the visual depiction. The term “disclose” means to transfer, publish, distribute, or make accessible.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 49 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):District courts have begun applying the 15 U.S.C. 6851 private action for nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. Goodnight v. Hammons (2025) read its unwelcome conduct and public concern exceptions narrowly and let the claim proceed. Parkes v. Walker II (2025) dismissed a claim that did not plead interstate commerce.
Leading cases:
- TILLE v. KAPLAN (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)“…iolence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2022 (“VAWA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6851. Compl., D.E. 1, at 7-8. The allegati…”
- Turner v. Echols (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025)✓A pretrial detainee sued an FBI agent under 15 U.S.C. 6851 over intimate images found in a warrantless phone search; the court dismissed, finding he never alleged he was depicted, never plausibly alleged disclosure, and that the law enforcement exception applied.
- Goodnight v. Hammons (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma 2025)✓A wife allegedly accessed her husband's devices, took his girlfriend's nude photos and sent them to a coworker; the court let the 15 U.S.C. 6851 claim proceed, rejecting the statute's unwelcome-conduct and public-concern exceptions as covering discovered infidelity.
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: How to File a DMCA Takedown on Xvideos (2026 Guide), What Is the Take It Down Act? The 2025 Federal NCII Law Explained, How to File a Take It Down Request (Step by Step)
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- The Mississippi Bar(msbar.org)
- Mississippi Attorney General's Office(ms.gov).gov
- Cyberbullying Research Center(cyberbullying.org)
- NCMEC CyberTipline(report.cybertip.org)
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative(cybercivilrights.org)
- TAKE IT DOWN Act, Public Law 119-12 (2025)(congress.gov).gov
- Mississippi House Bill 1308 (2025 Regular Session, as sent to Governor), creating Miss. Code Ann. § 97-5-32 (grooming of a child) and bringing forward §§ 97-5-33 and 97-5-35(ls.state.ms.us).gov
- Mississippi Senate Bill 2121 (2021 Regular Session, as sent to Governor), codified at Miss. Code Ann. § 97-29-64.1 (disclosure of intimate visual material)(ls.state.ms.us).gov
- Mississippi Judiciary, MS Crime Code Master (listing § 97-29-64.1(7)(a)-(c), disclosing intimate visual material)(courts.ms.gov).gov