West Virginia
West Virginia Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 8 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

West Virginia protects public employees from retaliation for reporting wrongdoing or waste under the West Virginia Whistle-Blower Law, W. Va. Code 6C-1-3. Public employees who report in good faith may recover reinstatement, back wages, and actual damages. Employers who retaliate face civil fines up to $5,000.
Overview of West Virginia Whistleblower Laws
West Virginia is an employment-at-will state, meaning employers can generally terminate employees for any reason or no reason. However, both statutory and common law protections create important exceptions for whistleblowers who report illegal activity, waste, or safety concerns.

The primary whistleblower statute is the West Virginia Whistle-Blower Law (W. Va. Code Chapter 6C, Article 1), which covers public employees. Additional statutes protect workers in specific industries including mining, healthcare, and wage enforcement. West Virginia also recognizes a relatively broad common law public policy exception that provides protection for private sector employees.
West Virginia does not have a state-level False Claims Act with qui tam provisions. Federal whistleblower protections apply to all West Virginia workers. For a complete overview, see our guide to Federal Whistleblower Laws.
Common Law Protections
West Virginia courts recognize a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Under this exception, employers cannot discharge employees for reasons that violate clearly established public policy. Courts look to constitutional provisions, statutes, and prior judicial opinions to determine whether a public policy applies.
West Virginia's common law protections cover employees who:
- Act in self-defense in the workplace
- File workers' compensation claims
- File lawsuits against their employer
- Refuse to participate in unlawful activities
- Refuse to write false workplace safety reports
This common law protection is particularly important in West Virginia because the state's primary whistleblower statute (W. Va. Code 6C-1) applies mainly to public employees. Private sector workers who face retaliation for reporting wrongdoing often rely on the common law public policy exception.
The statute of limitations for common law retaliatory discharge claims is generally two years.
West Virginia Whistle-Blower Law (Public Employees)
The West Virginia Whistle-Blower Law, codified at W. Va. Code Chapter 6C, Article 1, is the state's primary whistleblower protection statute.
Who Is Protected
The law covers public employees who work for state or local government entities. It protects employees who report wrongdoing or waste in good faith.
Protected Activities
Under W. Va. Code 6C-1-3, employers cannot discharge, threaten, alter terms of employment, or discriminate against a public employee for:
- Reporting in good faith, or being about to report, wrongdoing or waste to the employer or an appropriate authority (subsection (a))
- Being requested or subpoenaed by an appropriate authority to participate in an investigation, hearing, or inquiry held by an appropriate authority, or in a court action (subsection (b))
Good Faith Requirement
Reports must be made in good faith, with a reasonable belief that the information is accurate. False, reckless, or malicious disclosures are not protected under the statute. This means employees should take care to verify the accuracy of their reports before filing.
Remedies
Public employees who prevail under the Whistle-Blower Law may recover:
- Reinstatement to their former position
- Payment of back wages
- Full reinstatement of fringe benefits and seniority rights
- Actual damages
Penalties for Employers
Employers who violate the Whistle-Blower Law face significant consequences:
- A civil fine of up to $5,000
- If the court finds that the employer committed the violation with the purpose of discouraging disclosure, the finding may be treated as official misconduct and malfeasance in office
- The finding may be used as evidence in proceedings to remove the violator from public office
- Public bodies may use the finding as a basis to discipline the violator
Statute of Limitations
Under W. Va. Code 6C-1-4(a), a civil action under the Whistle-Blower Law must be brought within two years after the occurrence of the alleged violation. This two-year window does not carry over to the mining discrimination appeal described below, which runs thirty days.
No State False Claims Act
Unlike many states, West Virginia does not have a comprehensive state False Claims Act with qui tam provisions. This means private citizens cannot file state-level lawsuits on behalf of West Virginia to recover funds obtained through fraud, and there are no state whistleblower award programs.
However, employees who discover fraud against the federal government (including federal funds administered in West Virginia) can still file qui tam lawsuits under the federal False Claims Act. The federal law provides whistleblower awards of 15% to 30% of recovered funds and includes anti-retaliation protections.
Additional Whistleblower Protections
West Virginia has several other statutes that protect employees in specific contexts.
Anti-Discrimination Protections
In 2024, the West Virginia Legislature relocated the Human Rights Act from Chapter 5, Article 11 to Chapter 16B, Article 17. Under W. Va. Code 16B-17-9(7)(C), it is unlawful to discriminate against individuals in retaliation for:
- Opposing practices that are forbidden under the West Virginia Human Rights Act
- Filing a complaint under the statute
- Testifying or assisting in a proceeding
The Human Rights Act prohibits employment discrimination based on race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, blindness, and disability.
Complaints must be filed with the West Virginia Human Rights Commission (WVHRC) within 365 days of the retaliatory action. This is notably longer than many states' filing deadlines. Remedies include a cease and desist order, hiring or reinstatement with back pay, restoration to labor organization membership, and other appropriate relief.
Miners' Health, Safety, and Training
Under W. Va. Code 22A-1-22(a), no person may discharge or in any other way discriminate against a miner or a miner's authorized representative because that miner or representative:
- Notified the Director, an authorized representative, or an operator of an alleged violation or danger
- Filed or instituted a proceeding under the mining safety law
- Testified or is about to testify in a proceeding under that law
The deadline for a miner is short, and it is not the two-year window that applies to most other West Virginia retaliation claims. Subsection (b) gives a miner or a representative of miners who believes he or she was discharged or discriminated against, or a miner who has not been compensated for lost time due to a withdrawal order, thirty days after the violation occurs to apply to the appeals board for a review. That board is the three-member Board of Appeals continued under W. Va. Code 22A-5-1, whose duties include hearing appeals from discharge or discrimination. If you are a miner who was discharged or discriminated against, get a free case evaluation from a West Virginia employment lawyer on the Board of Appeals application within those thirty days (attorney advertising).
The board investigates, provides an opportunity for a public hearing at any party's request, and if it finds a violation must issue a decision within forty-five days ordering relief that can include rehiring or reinstatement with back pay and compensation for idle time. If a discharge proceeding is not completed within forty-five days because of delay caused by the operator, the miner is automatically reinstated until the final determination. Under subsection (c), a successful applicant may request that costs, expenses, and attorney's fees be assessed against the person who committed the violation.
Safety violations and dangers themselves are reported to the Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training at (304) 558-1425, but contacting that office is not the same step as the thirty-day application to the appeals board and does not preserve that deadline. This protection is especially significant in West Virginia given the state's mining industry.
Nursing Home Residents, Families, and Employees
Under W. Va. Code 9-6-12(b), no nursing home may discharge or in any manner discriminate against any resident, family member, legal representative, or employee because that person filed a complaint or participated in any matter or proceeding stemming from the provisions of Chapter 9, Article 6.
Two points are easy to get wrong here. The protection is not limited to staff: residents, their family members, and their legal representatives are covered in the same sentence. And the trigger is any complaint or proceeding stemming from that article, not only a complaint about abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation.
A nursing home that retaliates in violation of this provision risks suspension or revocation of its facility license, or other appropriate action by the state.
Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Under W. Va. Code 16-5L-18(b), no person may retaliate against an employee of a long-term care facility or government agency for filing a complaint or providing information in good faith to a state or regional long-term care ombudsman.
Violators may be found guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $100 or imprisonment up to 90 days for a first offense. For second and subsequent offenses, the penalties increase to a fine up to $250 or imprisonment up to 90 days. Each day of continuing violation counts as a separate offense.
Wage and Hour Violations
Under W. Va. Code 21-5C-7(a), employers cannot retaliate against employees who:
- File complaints about unpaid wages with the commissioner or employer
- Institute or intend to institute a civil action related to wage violations
- File a petition or criminal complaint against the employer
- Testify or intend to testify in wage-related proceedings
Violators may be found guilty of a misdemeanor with fines ranging from $100 to $500.
Workers' Compensation
Under W. Va. Code 23-5A-1, employers cannot discriminate against current or former employees for receiving workers' compensation benefits or attempting to file workers' compensation claims.
How to File a Whistleblower Complaint in West Virginia
Public Employees
Public employees should report wrongdoing or waste to their employer or an appropriate authority. Reports should be made in good faith and documented in writing. If retaliation occurs, file a lawsuit within two years of the adverse action.
Discrimination Complaints
File a complaint with the West Virginia Human Rights Commission within 365 days of the retaliatory action. Complaint forms are available on the WVHRC website.
Mining Safety
Report safety violations and dangers to the Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training at (304) 558-1425. If you were discharged or discriminated against, that call is not enough: under W. Va. Code 22A-1-22(b) you must apply to the appeals board for a review within thirty days after the violation occurs, and that deadline is far shorter than the two years that applies to most other retaliation claims.
Federal False Claims
Since West Virginia does not have a state qui tam law, whistleblowers who discover fraud against the government should consider filing under the federal False Claims Act. These complaints are filed under seal in federal court.
Practical Tips for West Virginia Whistleblowers
- Make reports in good faith and verify the accuracy of your information before reporting.
- Document everything in writing, including the wrongdoing you observed and any retaliatory actions.
- Check which deadline applies to your claim: two years for public employee Whistle-Blower Law and common law retaliation suits, 365 days for Human Rights Commission complaints, and only thirty days for a miner's appeal to the appeals board under W. Va. Code 22A-1-22(b).
- Private sector employees should review whether the common law public policy exception covers their situation.
- Consult an employment attorney experienced in West Virginia whistleblower law.
- Even without a state qui tam law, federal protections may apply if the fraud involves federal funds.
More West Virginia Laws
- West Virginia At-Will Employment Laws
- West Virginia Employee Monitoring Laws
- West Virginia Final Paycheck Laws
- West Virginia Workers Compensation Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does West Virginia's Whistle-Blower Law protect private sector employees?
The Whistle-Blower Law (W. Va. Code 6C-1) primarily protects public employees. Private sector workers must rely on the common law public policy exception, which protects employees who refuse illegal activities, file workers' compensation claims, or exercise other legally recognized rights.
Can I file a qui tam (False Claims Act) lawsuit in West Virginia?
West Virginia does not have a state False Claims Act with qui tam provisions. However, you can file a qui tam lawsuit under the federal False Claims Act if the fraud involves federal government funds. The federal law provides whistleblower awards of 15% to 30% of recovered funds.
How long do I have to file a whistleblower retaliation claim in West Virginia?
It depends on the claim. A civil action under the Whistle-Blower Law must be brought within two years after the alleged violation under W. Va. Code 6C-1-4(a), and common law retaliatory discharge claims also run two years. Discrimination complaints filed with the West Virginia Human Rights Commission have a 365-day deadline. A miner who was discharged or discriminated against has only thirty days after the violation occurs to apply to the appeals board for a review under W. Va. Code 22A-1-22(b).
What penalties do employers face for retaliating against whistleblowers in West Virginia?
Under the Whistle-Blower Law, employers face civil fines up to $5,000. If the court finds the violation was intended to discourage disclosure, it may be treated as official misconduct and malfeasance in office, potentially leading to removal from public office.
Are coal miners protected as whistleblowers in West Virginia?
Yes. W. Va. Code 22A-1-22(a) protects miners and their authorized representatives from discharge or discrimination for notifying the Director or an operator of an alleged violation or danger, filing or instituting a proceeding, or testifying in a proceeding under the mining safety law. The deadline is short: subsection (b) requires the miner or representative to apply to the appeals board for a review within thirty days after the violation occurs, not the two years that applies to most other West Virginia retaliation claims. Safety hazards themselves are reported to the Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training.
Updates
Corrected the coal miner retaliation section to add the thirty-day deadline to apply to the appeals board under W. Va. Code 22A-1-22(b), broadened the nursing home anti-retaliation protection to the residents, family members, and legal representatives the statute also covers, and fixed a subsection pinpoint in the Whistle-Blower Law protected-activities list.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Re-pinned the Human Rights Act anti-retaliation discussion from the repealed W. Va. Code 5-11-9 to its 2024 recodified location at W. Va. Code 16B-17-9, and corrected the nursing-home retaliation penalty to match 9-6-12's actual license-suspension consequence instead of an unsupported $100 fine.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
West Virginia Code
§ 6C-1-3Discriminatory and retaliatory actions against whistle-blowers prohibited; promotion, increased compensation protected.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) No employer may discharge, threaten, or otherwise discriminate or retaliate against an employee by changing the employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the employee, acting on his or her own volition, or a person acting on behalf of or under the direction of the employee, makes a good faith report, or is about to report, verbally or in writing, to the employer or appropriate authority, an instance of wrongdoing or waste. (b) No employer may discharge, threaten, or otherwise discriminate or retaliate against an employee by changing the employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the employee is requested or subpoenaed by an appropriate authority to participate in an investigation, hearing, or inquiry held by an appropriate authority or in a court action. (c) No employer may deny a whistle-blower covered by the civil service system, because of his or her status or actions as a whistle-blower, a promotion or other increase in compensation that the whistle-blower otherwise would have received.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 5 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kroll v. Sheppard (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 2024)“…ppropriate authority, an instance of wrongdoing or waste.” W. Va. Code § 6C-1-3-(a). Additionally, the Whistleblower Ac…”
- Mullins v. Johnson (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 2024)“…gdoing or waste. W. Va. Code § 6C-1-3(a). Relevant here, the statute defines…”
- McCoy v. Kanawha County Board of Education (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2024)“…nce of wrongdoing or waste. W. Va. Code § 6C-1-3. “Waste” is defined as “an employer or…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16B-17-9Unlawful discriminatory practices.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification, or except where based upon applicable security regulations established by the United States or the State of West Virginia or its agencies or political subdivisions: (1) For any employer to discriminate against an individual with respect to compensation, hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment if the individual is able and competent to perform the services required even if such individual is blind or disabled: Provided, That it shall not be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to observe the provisions of any bona fide pension, retirement, group or employee insurance or welfare benefit plan or system not adopted as a subterfuge to evade the provisions of this subdivision: Provided further, That an employer may grant preference in hiring to a military spouse or to a veteran or disabled veteran in accordance with the provisions of §16B-17-9a of this code without violating the provisions of this article.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dominique Spatafore v. City of Clarksburg (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2026)“…red even if such individual is blind or disabled.” W. Va. Code § 16B-17-9. The WHVRA defines “disability…”
- Hargrave v. Davis Memorial Hospital Corp. (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 2025)“…dual is blind or disabled. W. Va. Code § 16B-17-9(1). In adjudicating claims of unlawful…”
- O.W. v. Cabell County Board of Education (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2024)“…ileges, or services of the place of public accommodations.” W. Va. Code § 16B-17-9(6)(A). Defendants make three arguments…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Wrongful Termination in West Virginia (2026): Laws and Deadlines
§ 22A-1-22Discrimination.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) No person shall discharge or in any other way discriminate against or cause to be discharged or discriminated against any miner or any authorized representative of miners by reason of the fact that the person believes or knows that such miner or representative: (1) Has notified the director, his or her authorized representative, or an operator, directly or indirectly, of any alleged violation or danger; (2) has filed, instituted or caused to be filed or instituted any proceeding under this law; (3) has testified or is about to testify in any proceeding resulting from the administration or enforcement of the provisions of this law. No miner or representative shall be discharged or in any other way discriminated against or caused to be discriminated against because a miner or representative has done subdivision (1), (2) or (3) above.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2017
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Crum v. International Coal Group, Inc. (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2017)“…Corp., 424 S.E.2d 606, 612 (W.Va. 1992)). Pursuant to W.Va. Code § 22A-1-22, “[n]o person shall discharge or in any…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 21-5C-7Offenses and penalties.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
(a) Any employer who wilfully discharges or in any manner wilfully discriminates against any employee because such employee has made complaint to his employer, or to the commissioner, that he has not been paid wages in accordance with the wage and hour provisions of this article, or because such employee has instituted or is about to institute any civil action, or file any petition or criminal complaint against the employer by reason of the provisions of this article, or because such employee has testified or is about to testify in any administrative proceeding, civil action, or criminal action under this article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than $100 nor more than $500.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Also relied on in: West Virginia Minimum Wage 2026: $8.75 Per Hour Explained
§ 23-5A-1Discriminatory practices prohibited.In forcecited in 4 of our articles
No employer shall discriminate in any manner against any of his present or former employees because of such present or former employee's receipt of or attempt to receive benefits under this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 13 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Benjamin Reynolds v. American National Red Cross (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2012, 701 F.3d 143)“…but rather by retaliation provisions under state law. See W. Va. Code § 23-5A-1 ("No employer shall dis- criminate in a…”
- Husk v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1994, 842 F. Supp. 895)“…harge found in the West Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, W.Va.Code § 23-5A-1 (1978). The Plaintiff argues in his mot…”
- Alexander v. Westinghouse Hittman Nuclear Inc. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1985, 612 F. Supp. 1118)“…ted a 1978 amendment to the workmen’s compensation statute, W.Va. Code § 23-5A-1: No employer shall discriminate…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: West Virginia At-Will Employment Laws: Exceptions and Your Rights
§ 9-6-12Reporting person's immunity from liability.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Any person who in good faith makes or causes to be made any report permitted or required by this article shall be immune from any civil or criminal liability which might otherwise arise solely out of making such report. (b) No nursing home may discharge or in any manner discriminate against any resident, family member, legal representative or employee for the reason that he or she filed a complaint or participated in any matter or proceeding stemming from the provisions of this article. (c) Violation of the prohibition contained in subsection (b) of this section by a nursing home or other residential facility constitutes grounds for the suspension or revocation of the license of the facility, if it operates under license pursuant to this code, or other appropriate measure.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2021
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Hoback v. Cox (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2021)“…applies to reports “permitted or required by this article.” W. Va. Code § 9-6-12. Defendants have not identified any se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-5L-18Willful interference; retaliation; penalties.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) Any individual who willfully interferes with or impedes a state or regional long-term care ombudsman or ombudsman volunteer in the performance of his or her official duties shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned in the county jail for not more than ninety days, or both fined and imprisoned. (b) Any individual who institutes or commits a discriminatory, disciplinary, retaliatory or reprisal action against any officer or employee of a long-term care facility or government department or agency, against any resident of a long-term care facility or against any guardian, attorney in fact or against any family member of any resident of a long-term care facility for having filed a complaint with or provided information in good faith to a state or regional long-term ombudsman or ombudsman volunteer to aid the long-term care ombudsman or ombudsman volunteer in carrying out the duties pursuant to this article is guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100, or imprisoned in the county jail for not more than ninety days, or both fined and imprisoned.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
§ 5-11-9Unlawful discriminatory practices.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
[Repealed.]
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 73 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Thomas v. Shoney's Inc. (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1994, 845 F. Supp. 388)“…e of action arose under the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W.Va. Code § 5-11-9(1) (1992). That provision makes it an u…”
- Larry v. Marion Cnty. Coal Co. (United States District Court 2018, 302 F. Supp. 3d 763)“…tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment." W. Va. Code § 5-11-9 (c). Discrimination "means to exclude…”
- Chandra Balderson v. Lincare Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2023, 62 F.4th 156)“…at it violated the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va. Code § 5-11-9, which is enforced with the ju…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 22A-5-1Board of appeals.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
There is hereby continued a board of appeals, consisting of three members. Two members of the board shall be appointed by the Governor, one person who by reason of previous training and experience may reasonably be said to represent the viewpoint of miners, and one person who by reason of previous training and experience may reasonably be said to represent the viewpoint of the operators. The third person, who is chair of the board and who must not have had any connection at any time with the coal industry or an organization representing miners, is selected by the two members appointed by the Governor. The term of office of members of the board is five years. The function and duties of the board is to hear appeals, make determinations on questions of miners' entitlements due to withdrawal orders and appeals from discharge or discrimination, and suspension of certification certificates. The chair of the board has the power to administer oaths and subpoena witnesses and require production of any books, papers, records or other documents relevant or material to the appeal inquiry.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
§ 6C-1-4Civil action by whistle-blower for violation; limitation on actions; burden of proof; defense; use of evidence in civil service proceeding; grievance action available; other rights and actions not limited.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person who alleges that he or she is a victim of a violation of this article may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction for appropriate injunctive relief or damages, or both, within two years after the occurrence of the alleged violation. (b) An employee alleging a violation of this article must show by a preponderance of the evidence that, prior to the alleged reprisal, the employee, or a person acting on behalf of or under the direction of the employee, had reported or was about to report in good faith, verbally or in writing, an instance of wrongdoing or waste to the employer or an appropriate authority. (c) It shall be a defense to an action under this section if the defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the action complained of occurred for separate and legitimate reasons, which are not merely pretexts. (d) An employee covered by the civil service system who contests a civil service action, believing it to be motivated by the employee having made a disclosure of information, may submit as admissible evidence any or all material relating to the action as whistle-blower and to the resulting alleged reprisal.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-30 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at code.wvlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Simmons v. Village of Barboursville (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2024)“…vono v. Wilmoth, 889 S.E.2d 738, 746 (W. Va. 2023) (citing W. Va. Code § 6C-1-4(a)). “While the statute provides for t…”
- Hoback v. Cox (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2020)“…ighty days after the occurrence of the alleged violation.” W. Va. Code § 6C-1-4(a).…”
- Zeng v. Marshall University (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2018)“…bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction.” W. Va. Code § 6C-1-4(a). Undoubtedly, this language permit…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- W. Va. Code 6C-1-3 - Whistle-Blower Law protections(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 16B-17-9 - Human Rights Act discrimination protections (recodified from 5-11-9 in 2024)(code.wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 22A-1-22 - Miners' Health, Safety, and Training(wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 9-6-12 - Nursing Home employee protections(wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 16-5L-18 - Long-Term Care Ombudsman protections(wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 21-5C-7 - Wage and Hour violation protections(wvlegislature.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 23-5A-1 - Workers' Compensation retaliation protections(wvlegislature.gov).gov
- West Virginia Human Rights Commission(hrc.wv.gov).gov
- W. Va. Code 22A-1-22 - Discrimination (miners; thirty-day application to the appeals board)(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- W. Va. Code 22A-5-1 - Board of appeals(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- W. Va. Code 9-6-12 - Reporting person's immunity from liability; nursing home anti-retaliation(code.wvlegislature.gov)
- W. Va. Code 6C-1-4 - Civil action by whistle-blower; two-year limitation(code.wvlegislature.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.