Nebraska
Nebraska Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 4 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Nebraska protects state employees who report government wrongdoing through the State Government Effectiveness Act (Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2701 to 81-2711). Private sector employees have no whistleblower statute written for them alone, but they are not limited to the common law: Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1114(1)(c) protects an employee who opposed any practice or refused to carry out any action unlawful under federal or Nebraska law, and the common law public policy exception covers retaliation that no statute reaches.
Overview of Nebraska Whistleblower Laws
Nebraska is an employment-at-will state, which means employers can generally terminate employees for any reason or no reason at all. However, Nebraska law provides important exceptions to this rule that protect employees who speak up about wrongdoing in the workplace.
The primary state-level whistleblower protection in Nebraska comes from the State Government Effectiveness Act, codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2701 through 81-2711. Passed by the Nebraska Legislature in 1993, this law encourages state employees to come forward with information about gross inefficiency and misconduct in state government.
Private sector employees in Nebraska have no whistleblower statute written specifically for them, but the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act reaches a large share of whistleblower retaliation anyway. Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1114(1)(c) makes it an unlawful employment practice to discriminate against an employee who "has opposed any practice or refused to carry out any action unlawful under federal law or the laws of this state." Where no statute reaches the conduct, private employees rely on the common law public policy exception to at-will employment, which courts have recognized as a basis for wrongful termination claims when an employer fires a worker for reasons that violate clear public policy.
In addition to state protections, Nebraska employees may also qualify for coverage under several federal whistleblower laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the False Claims Act, and OSHA whistleblower provisions.
Who Is Protected Under Nebraska Whistleblower Laws
Public Sector Employees

The State Government Effectiveness Act specifically covers employees of state administrative agencies. This includes workers in executive branch departments, boards, commissions, and other state agencies.
However, the Act does not cover all government workers. The following groups fall outside its protections:
- Legislative staff members
- The Governor's personal staff
- Employees of the court system
- Local government employees (city, county, and municipal workers)
State employees who are covered must report wrongdoing to the proper authorities to receive protection. The Act does not protect anonymous tips or reports made to the media without first going through official channels.
Private Sector Employees
Nebraska does not have a whistleblower statute written specifically for the private sector, but that does not leave private employees on the common law alone.
Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1114(1)(c) makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against an employee because he or she "has opposed any practice or refused to carry out any action unlawful under federal law or the laws of this state." That language reaches an employee who objects to, or refuses to take part in, conduct that breaks state or federal law, whether or not the conduct is itself employment discrimination.
Two limits matter. First, the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act defines an employer as one with fifteen or more employees for each working day in twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year, so the smallest employers are outside it. Second, the claim follows that Act's procedure: a written charge must be filed with the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission within three hundred days of the practice, and an action filed directly in district court is due within ninety days after the complainant receives notice of the commission's last action. Neb. Rev. Stat. 20-148 separately allows a civil action against a private employer for the deprivation of rights secured by Nebraska law.
Whether the statutory route is available also affects the common law claim discussed below, because under Dibbern a common law claim does not exist where the statute embodying the public policy supplies its own remedy for the same conduct.
Private employees whose situation no statute reaches pursue claims under the common law public policy exception to at-will employment. Under this exception, an employee may claim damages for wrongful discharge when the motivation for the firing contravenes public policy. Nebraska courts have stated that this exception is restricted to cases where a clear mandate of public policy has been violated. Courts look at whether the employer's conduct contravenes the letter or purpose of a constitutional, statutory, or regulatory provision.
What Activities Are Protected
Reports Covered by the State Government Effectiveness Act
The Act protects state employees who report the following types of wrongdoing:
- Violations of law. Any violation of state or federal law by a state agency or its employees qualifies as protected reporting.
- Gross mismanagement. Reports of significant mismanagement of agency operations or programs are covered.
- Gross waste of public funds. Employees who report substantial waste of taxpayer money receive protection.
- Abuse of authority. Reports of officials using their position improperly are protected.
- Dangers to public health or safety. Employees who identify a substantial and specific danger to the health or safety of the public are covered.
The wrongdoing must be reported either to the Nebraska Ombudsman's Office (also called the Public Counsel) or to any elected state official, such as a state senator, the State Auditor, or the Attorney General.
Common Law Public Policy Exception
For private sector employees, protected activities under the public policy exception typically include:
- Refusing to perform an illegal act requested by an employer
- Reporting an employer's violation of law to authorities
- Exercising a statutory right, such as filing a workers' compensation claim
- Fulfilling a public obligation, such as serving on a jury
The key requirement is that the employee must point to a clear mandate of public policy, usually found in a specific statute, regulation, or constitutional provision, to support their claim. Under the Nebraska Supreme Court's 2025 decision in Dibbern v. York Surgical Associates, however, this common-law claim is unavailable if the statute establishing that public policy already provides its own remedy for the same conduct, in which case the employee must pursue the statutory remedy instead.
Prohibited Retaliatory Actions
Under the State Government Effectiveness Act, a state agency is forbidden from taking any personnel action against an employee in retaliation for making a covered report of wrongdoing. Prohibited retaliatory actions include:
- Termination or firing
- Demotion or reduction in pay
- Suspension without pay
- Transfer to a less desirable position
- Denial of promotion
- Negative performance evaluations motivated by the report
- Harassment or intimidation
- Any other adverse employment action taken because of the whistleblower report
For private sector employees relying on the public policy exception, wrongful termination is the primary prohibited action. Nebraska courts may also consider constructive discharge, where an employer makes working conditions so intolerable that the employee is forced to resign.
How to File a Whistleblower Complaint in Nebraska
Step 1: Report the Wrongdoing
State employees should report wrongdoing to the Nebraska Ombudsman's Office or to an elected state official. The Ombudsman's Office is located within the Nebraska Legislature and serves as the primary investigative body for whistleblower complaints.
You can contact the Nebraska Ombudsman's Office at:
- Phone: (402) 471-2035
- Toll-free: (800) 742-7690
- Website: nebraskalegislature.gov/divisions/ombud-whistle.php
Step 2: Document the Retaliation
If you experience retaliation after making a report, document every adverse action taken against you. Keep copies of performance reviews, emails, memos, and any communications that demonstrate a change in treatment following your report.
Step 3: File a Retaliation Allegation with the Public Counsel
The Public Counsel receives allegations that section 81-2705 has been violated and investigates whether there are grounds to believe a violation occurred or is about to occur. If the office finds such grounds by a preponderance of the evidence, Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2706 requires it to transmit the written finding to the employee, to the Governor, and to the State Personnel Board, the agency's personnel appeals board, or the agency director. The finding must also state whether the violation occurred or will occur within two years after the date of the protected activity.
Step 4: Petition for an Administrative Hearing
The finding is not simply evidence for a later lawsuit. Under Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2707, an employee who receives it may petition the State Personnel Board, the personnel appeals board, or the agency director or chief operating officer to hold a hearing on whether a violation occurred. If the personnel action is stayed or reversed, that hearing must be held within ninety days; if it is not stayed, it must be held within ten days of the petition. The employee may be represented by counsel. This body, not a court, is where backpay, other appropriate relief, and reasonable attorney's fees are first awarded.
A presumption helps the employee at this stage. If the employee establishes that the personnel action was taken after he or she submitted an allegation of wrongdoing or gave information to the Public Counsel or an official, the action is presumed to have been taken because of that allegation, and the agency must rebut the presumption with appropriate evidence.
Step 5: Appeal or Sue Under the Administrative Procedure Act
Either the employee or the agency may appeal the hearing decision in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, and an employee who prevails on appeal receives reasonable attorney's fees for the appeal and the earlier hearings. Separately, Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2709 entitles an employee aggrieved by the decision rendered under section 81-2707(1) to maintain a cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act for damages, reinstatement, backpay, and other relief, including preliminary relief, with the same rebuttable presumption of retaliation. Because both routes run through the Administrative Procedure Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. 84-917 supplies the deadline: a petition for review must be filed in the district court within thirty days after service of the agency's final decision. That thirty-day window, not any multi-year period, is the deadline to watch.
Remedies Available to Nebraska Whistleblowers
Under the State Government Effectiveness Act
Whistleblowers who prevail in a retaliation claim under the Act may obtain the following, first from the hearing body under section 81-2707(2) and then from a court under section 81-2709(1):
- Reinstatement to the former position
- Back pay with interest
- Restoration of lost benefits, including seniority
- Compensation for actual damages suffered
- Reasonable attorney's fees and court costs
The Public Counsel's office does not award damages itself. Its role is investigatory, and its written finding is what opens the door to the administrative hearing where backpay and attorney's fees are awarded. Relief granted under section 81-2707(2) is paid from the funds of the agency in which the violation occurred.
Under the Common Law Public Policy Exception
Private sector employees who successfully prove wrongful discharge in violation of public policy may recover:
- Lost wages and benefits (back pay)
- Compensatory damages for emotional distress
- In some cases, punitive damages if the employer's conduct was especially egregious
- Attorney's fees (though this is not guaranteed and depends on the circumstances)
Statute of Limitations
The time limits for filing whistleblower claims in Nebraska depend on the type of claim:
- State Government Effectiveness Act: The Act sets no general limitations period of its own. It requires the Public Counsel's finding to address whether the violation occurred or will occur within two years after the protected activity, and once the case reaches the Administrative Procedure Act stage, Neb. Rev. Stat. 84-917 allows only thirty days after service of the agency's final decision to file a petition in district court. Treat the thirty-day window as the controlling deadline.
- Retaliation under the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act (48-1114): A written charge must be filed with the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission within three hundred days of the practice, and an action filed directly in district court is due within ninety days after notice of the commission's last action.
- Common law wrongful discharge: No specific limitations statute applies, so Nebraska's four-year catch-all for "an injury to the rights of the plaintiff, not arising on contract" (Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-207) generally governs.
- Federal whistleblower claims: Time limits vary by statute. For example, OSHA whistleblower complaints must typically be filed within 30 days, while False Claims Act qui tam actions have a six-year statute of limitations.
It is important to act quickly, as missing a deadline can permanently bar your claim. If you are not sure which route fits your situation, let a Nebraska employment lawyer identify the right claim and the deadline that controls it in a free case evaluation (attorney advertising).
Federal Whistleblower Protections in Nebraska
Nebraska employees also benefit from several federal whistleblower laws that apply regardless of whether the employer is public or private:
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
Protects employees of publicly traded companies who report securities fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, or violations of SEC rules. Complaints must be filed with OSHA within 180 days of the retaliatory action.
False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729-3733)
Allows employees to file qui tam lawsuits on behalf of the federal government against employers who defraud government programs. Whistleblowers may receive 15% to 30% of any recovery.
OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program
OSHA administers more than 20 federal whistleblower statutes covering a wide range of industries. Protected activities include reporting workplace safety hazards, environmental violations, and violations of transportation safety regulations.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act
Protects employees who report violations of securities laws to the SEC. Whistleblowers may be eligible for monetary awards of 10% to 30% of sanctions exceeding $1 million.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Prohibits retaliation against employees who report discrimination or participate in discrimination investigations.
Key Differences Between Nebraska and Neighboring States
Nebraska is not an outlier among its neighbors on the point that matters most. Iowa Code 70A.28 is a state-employee provision: it bars reprisal for disclosures by an employee of the state, and its own text says that "state employee" and "employee" include persons employed by the general assembly and by the state board of regents. It does not reach private employers. Kansas is the same. The Kansas whistleblower statute, K.S.A. 75-2973, protects state agency employees, sending classified employees to the state civil service board and unclassified employees to the Kansas judicial review act.
The gap in Nebraska law is real but narrower than it first appears. There is no whistleblower statute aimed at the private sector as such, and section 48-1114(1)(c) covers only employers with fifteen or more employees. Everything outside those bounds falls to the common law public policy exception, which places a heavier burden on employees to prove their case and offers less certainty about what activities are protected.
Recent Developments
In 2025, the Nebraska Supreme Court decided Dibbern v. York Surgical Associates, 318 Neb. 928, significantly narrowing the public policy exception to at-will employment. The court held that no common-law claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy exists where the statute embodying that public policy already provides its own remedy for the same conduct. In Dibbern, the employee was terminated after she said she intended to meet with federal investigators looking into alleged improper upcoding of Medicare charges, and because the federal False Claims Act already supplies a remedy for that conduct, the court held her common-law claim could not proceed and reversed the jury verdict in her favor. Private sector employees should first check whether a specific state or federal statute, such as the False Claims Act, already covers their situation, since that statute's remedy may be the only one available to them.
Nebraska has not enacted any new whistleblower legislation in 2025 or 2026. Advocates continue to push for broader statutory protections that would cover private sector employees, but no bills have advanced through the Legislature.
More Nebraska Laws
- Nebraska At-Will Employment Laws
- Nebraska Employee Monitoring Laws
- Nebraska Final Paycheck Laws
- Nebraska Workers Compensation Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Nebraska have a whistleblower protection law for private sector employees?
Nebraska has no whistleblower statute written specifically for the private sector, but private workers are not limited to the common law. Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1114(1)(c) makes it an unlawful employment practice to discriminate against an employee who has opposed any practice or refused to carry out any action unlawful under federal law or the laws of this state. That protection applies at employers with fifteen or more employees and is enforced through the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. Where no statute reaches the conduct, the common law public policy exception to at-will employment may still support a wrongful termination claim.
How long do I have to file a whistleblower retaliation claim in Nebraska?
It depends on the claim. The State Government Effectiveness Act sets no four-year deadline. A state employee goes through a Public Counsel investigation and an administrative hearing, and once the case reaches the Administrative Procedure Act stage, Neb. Rev. Stat. 84-917 allows only thirty days after service of the agency's final decision to petition a district court. A retaliation charge under Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1114 must be filed with the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission within three hundred days, with any direct district court action due within ninety days after the commission's last action. A common law wrongful discharge claim generally falls under Nebraska's four-year catch-all tort period. Federal whistleblower claims have varying deadlines, some as short as 30 days.
Where do I report whistleblower retaliation as a Nebraska state employee?
Nebraska state employees should report wrongdoing to the Nebraska Ombudsman's Office (also called the Public Counsel) at (402) 471-2035 or toll-free at (800) 742-7690. You may also report to any elected state official, including state senators, the State Auditor, or the Attorney General.
What remedies are available to Nebraska whistleblowers?
State employees first obtain backpay, other appropriate relief, and reasonable attorney's fees from the State Personnel Board, a personnel appeals board, or the agency director after a hearing under Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2707, and an employee aggrieved by that decision may then seek damages, reinstatement, backpay, and other relief in court under section 81-2709. Private sector employees may recover relief under the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act for retaliation covered by section 48-1114, or lost wages, compensatory damages for emotional distress, and potentially punitive damages through a common law wrongful discharge claim.
Are local government employees protected under Nebraska's whistleblower law?
No. The State Government Effectiveness Act only covers employees of state administrative agencies. Local government employees, including city, county, and municipal workers, are not covered by this statute. They may have protections under federal whistleblower laws or the common law public policy exception.
Updates
Corrected the description of Dibbern v. York Surgical Associates to match the facts and outcome stated in the opinion, removing an unsupported verdict amount.
Corrected the filing deadlines and the complaint procedure under the State Government Effectiveness Act, added the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act protection for private sector employees who refuse to carry out unlawful actions, and fixed the comparison with Iowa and Kansas law.
Corrected the description of the Nebraska Supreme Court's 2025 Dibbern v. York Surgical Associates decision, which did not simply reaffirm the existing public-policy exception but created a new rule barring a common-law wrongful-termination claim whenever a statute covering the same conduct already provides its own remedy, and added that caveat to the page's core explanation of the exception.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 81: STATE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS
§ 81-2705Employee protectionsIn force
Any person who has authority to recommend, approve, direct, or otherwise take or affect personnel action shall not, with respect to such authority: (1) Take personnel action against an employee because of the disclosure of information by the employee to the Public Counsel or an official which the employee reasonably believes evidences wrongdoing; (2) Take personnel action against an employee as a reprisal for the submission of an allegation of wrongdoing or a violation of this section to the Public Counsel or official by such employee; or (3) Take personnel action against an employee as a reprisal for providing information or testimony, pursuant to an investigation or hearing held under the State Government Effectiveness Act, to the Public Counsel, an official, the State Personnel Board, a corresponding personnel appeals board, or the director or chief operating officer of an agency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-14 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
§ 81-2709Employee; cause of action authorized; attorney's fees; presumptionIn force
(1) An employee aggrieved by the decision rendered pursuant to subsection (1) of section 81-2707 who has been or is about to be injured by a violation of section 81-2705 shall be entitled to maintain a cause of action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act for damages, reinstatement, backpay, and such other relief, including preliminary relief, as the court may deem appropriate. An employee who prevails in an action under this subsection shall receive reasonable attorney's fees incurred during the action. (2) In an action brought pursuant to subsection (1) of this section by an employee who establishes that a personnel action was taken against him or her after he or she submitted an allegation of wrongdoing or provided information to the Public Counsel, his or her investigators, employees, or agents, or an official in conjunction with a preliminary or formal investigation undertaken pursuant to section 81-2704, the personnel action shall be presumed to have been taken against such employee because of such allegation. Such presumption may be rebutted by appropriate evidence.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
§ 81-2707Employee protections; preliminary finding of violation; hearings; relief authorized; appeal; presumption; attorney's feesIn force
(1) Upon receiving the Public Counsel's finding that a violation of section 81-2705 has occurred or is about to occur, the employee who raised the allegation may petition the State Personnel Board, personnel appeals board, or director or chief operating officer of the agency to hold a hearing to determine whether a violation of section 81-2705 has occurred or is about to occur. Upon the receipt of such a petition, the State Personnel Board, personnel appeals board, or director or chief operating officer of the agency shall within ninety days hold a hearing to determine whether a violation of section 81-2705 has occurred or is about to occur.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1997
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission (Nebraska Supreme Court 1997, 251 Neb. 517)“…ice, dissenting. I dissent because I cannot conclude that Neb.Rev.Stat. § 81-2707(1) (Reissue 1994) is unconstitutional.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 81-2706Employee protections; Public Counsel; powers and dutiesIn force
(1) The Public Counsel shall receive any allegation of a violation of section 81-2705 and investigate to determine whether there are grounds to believe that a violation has occurred or is about to occur. (2) When investigating an allegation of a violation of section 81-2705, the Public Counsel shall have access to all information maintained by any agency or employee directly or indirectly involved. (3) If the Public Counsel terminates the investigation of an alleged violation of section 81-2705, the Public Counsel shall, in writing, promptly inform the employee who raised the allegation. (4) If the Public Counsel finds that there are grounds to believe by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation of section 81-2705 has occurred or is about to occur, he or she shall transmit his or her finding in writing to the employee who raised the allegation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission (Nebraska Supreme Court 1997, 251 Neb. 517)“…appeal, we are asked to determine the constitutionality of Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 81-2706 and 81-2707(1) (Reissue 1994) of the St…”
- Biby v. Board of Regents of University of Nebraska (District Court, D. Nebraska 2004, 340 F. Supp. 2d 1031)“…believe that a violation has occurred or is about to occur. Neb.Rev. Stat. § 81-2706. If the public counsel believes by a pr…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 81-2711Employee rights and responsibilities; notice requiredIn force
(1) By December 31, 2005, the Public Counsel shall prepare for agencies a written notice of the rights and responsibilities of employees under the State Government Effectiveness Act. By January 31, 2006, the Public Counsel shall distribute the written notice to each agency. (2) Beginning January 31, 2006, each agency shall post the notice in a conspicuous manner at the place of employment. Each agency shall inform its employees of their rights and responsibilities under the State Government Effectiveness Act by distributing the notice to each employee in print or electronic format.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
§ 81-2701Act, how citedIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Sections 81-2701 to 81-2711 shall be known and may be cited as the State Government Effectiveness Act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2004
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission (Nebraska Supreme Court 1997, 251 Neb. 517)“…the State Government Effectiveness Act (Whistleblower Act), Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 81-2701 through 81-2710 (Reissue 1994 & Cum.Sup…”
- Riggs v. County of Banner (District Court, D. Nebraska 2001, 159 F. Supp. 2d 1158)“…wing” safeguards of the State Government Effectiveness Act, Neb.Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 81-2701 to 81-2710 (Lexis 1999). This argument…”
- Biby v. Board of Regents of University of Nebraska (District Court, D. Nebraska 2004, 340 F. Supp. 2d 1031)“…ate Government Effectiveness Act (the “Whistleblower Act”), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 81-2701 et seq. Specifically, plai…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nebraska Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026)
Iowa Code, Chapter 70A: FINANCIAL AND OTHER PROVISIONS FOR
§ 70A.28Prohibitions relating to certain actions by state employees — penalty — civil remedies.In forcecited in 3 of our articles
1. A person who serves as the head of a state department or agency or otherwise serves in a supervisory capacity within the executive or legislative branch of state government shall not require an employee of the state to inform the person that the employee made a disclosure of information permitted by this section and shall not prohibit an employee of the state from disclosing any information to a member or employee of the general assembly or from disclosing information to any other public official or law enforcement agency if the employee reasonably believes the information evidences a violation of law or rule, mismanagement, a gross abuse of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. However, an employee may be required to inform the person that the employee made a disclosure of information permitted by this section if the employee represented that the disclosure was the official position of the employee’s immediate supervisor or employer. 2.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at legis.iowa.gov
Cited in 26 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Larry R. Hedlund v. State of Iowa (Supreme Court of Iowa 2019, 930 N.W.2d 707)“…dies under two distinct Iowa Code provisions. Iowa Code section 70A.28 5 and Iowa Code section 80.15 each addr…”
- Dennis L. Smith v. Iowa State University of Science and Technology and State of Iowa (Supreme Court of Iowa 2014, 851 N.W.2d 1)“…intentional infliction of emotional distress; violations of Iowa Code § 70A.28(2) (2007) (whistleblower protection sta…”
- Worthington v. Kenkel (Supreme Court of Iowa 2004, 684 N.W.2d 228)“…thorized by a statute. Appellant sought an injunction under Iowa Code section 70A.28 (2003) to prevent her discharge from he…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Iowa Workplace Recording Laws: Employee and Employer Rights (2026), Iowa Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 75: STATE DEPARTMENTS; PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
§ 75-2973Kansas whistleblower act; state employee communications with legislators, legislative committees, auditing agencies and others; prohibited acts; relief and appeals, costs.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas whistleblower act. (b) As used in this section: (1) "Auditing agency" means the (A) legislative post auditor, (B) any employee of the division of post audit, (C) any firm performing audit services pursuant to a contract with the post auditor, (D) any state agency or federal agency or authority performing auditing or other oversight activities under authority of any provision of law authorizing such activities, or (E) the inspector general created under K.S.A. 75-7427, and amendments thereto. (2) "Disciplinary action" means any dismissal, demotion, transfer, reassignment, suspension, reprimand, warning of possible dismissal or withholding of work. (3) "State agency" and "firm" have the meanings provided by K.S.A. 46-1112, and amendments thereto. (c) No supervisor or appointing authority of any state agency shall prohibit any employee of the state agency from discussing the operations of the state agency or other matters of public concern, including matters relating to the public health, safety and welfare either specifically or generally, with any member of the legislature or any auditing agency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kansas Department of Revenue v. Powell (Supreme Court of Kansas 2010, 290 Kan. 564)“…ialize.” The court also observed that the plain language of K.S.A. 75-2973(f) did not require die Board to award t…”
- Connelly v. Kansas Highway Patrol (Supreme Court of Kansas 2001, 271 Kan. 944)“…o three of the troopers under the Kansas Whistleblower Act, K.S.A. 75-2973, and in entering judgment in favor of t…”
- Prager v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue (Supreme Court of Kansas 2001, 271 Kan. 1)“…nsas Civil Service Board contending his suspension violated K.S.A. 75-2973, the Kansas “whistleblower” statute.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 20: CIVIL RIGHTS
§ 20-148Deprivation of constitutional and statutory rights, privileges, or immunities; redressIn force
(1) Any person or company, as defined in section 49-801, except any political subdivision, who subjects or causes to be subjected any citizen of this state or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution or the Constitution and laws of the State of Nebraska, shall be liable to such injured person in a civil action or other proper proceeding for redress brought by such injured person. (2) The remedies provided by this section shall be in addition to any other remedy provided by Chapter 20, article 1, and shall not be interpreted as denying any person the right of seeking other proper remedies provided thereunder.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 62 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2023
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Goolsby v. Anderson (Nebraska Supreme Court 1996, 250 Neb. 306)“…in ruling that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 20-148 (Reissue 1991) to hear her causes of ac…”
- Cole v. Clarke (Nebraska Court of Appeals 1999, 8 Neb. Ct. App. 614)“…fendants in their “individual capacities . . . pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 20-148 (Reissue 1991)” were for all the perso…”
- Wichman v. Naylor (Nebraska Supreme Court 1992, 241 Neb. 249)“…d a civil rights action, see 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 20-148 (Reissue 1991), in the district court…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 25: COURTS; CIVIL PROCEDURE
§ 25-207Actions for trespass, conversion, other torts, and frauds; exceptionsIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
The following actions can only be brought within four years: (1) An action for trespass upon real property; (2) an action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for the specific recovery of personal property; (3) an action for an injury to the rights of the plaintiff, not arising on contract, and not hereinafter enumerated; and (4) an action for relief on the ground of fraud, but the cause of action in such case shall not be deemed to have accrued until the discovery of the fraud, except as provided in sections 30-2206 and 76-288 to 76-298.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 182 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Manker v. Manker (Nebraska Supreme Court 2002, 263 Neb. 944)“…tems, stocks, bonds, mutual fund shares, and bank accounts. Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-207 (Reissue 1995) is the applicable statut…”
- Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co. (Nebraska Supreme Court 1992, 240 Neb. 275)“…ce Actions. As a general statute of limitations, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207 (Reissue 1989) requires that an action…”
- Chafin v. Wis. Province of the Soc'y of Jesus (Nebraska Supreme Court 2018, 301 Neb. 94)“…n's claims are barred by a 4-year statute of limitations. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207 (3) (Reissue 2016) sets forth a 4-year…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Nebraska Car Accident Laws: Fault, Insurance, and Your Claim, Motorcycle Accident Laws in Nebraska (2026): Deadlines, Nebraska Slip and Fall Laws: Proving Premises Liability
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 48: LABOR
§ 48-1114Opposition to unlawful practice; participation in investigation; communication regarding employee wages, benefits, or other compensation; discrimination prohibitedIn force
(1) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any of his or her employees or applicants for employment, for an employment agency to discriminate against any individual, or for a labor organization to discriminate against any member thereof or applicant for membership, because he or she (a) has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act, (b) has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under the act, (c) has opposed any practice or refused to carry out any action unlawful under federal law or the laws of this state, or (d) has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed information regarding employee wages, benefits, or other compensation.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 37 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- McPherson v. City of Scottsbluff (Nebraska Supreme Court 2019, 303 Neb. 765)“…a prima facie case of retaliation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1114 (Reissue 2010) by s…”
- Baker-Heser v. State (Nebraska Supreme Court 2021, 963 N.W.2d 59)“…yment Practices: Words and Phrases. The “practice” in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1114(1)(c) (Cum. Supp. 2020) refers to an un…”
- Wolfe v. Becton Dickinson and Co. (Nebraska Supreme Court 2003, 266 Neb. 53)“…asis of the employee’s opposition to an unlawful practice. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1114 (Reissue 1998). The district co…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 48-1118Unlawful practice; charge; time for filing; prescreening procedure and determination; investigation; confidential informal actions; procedure; violation; penalty; interrogatoriesIn force
(1) Whenever it is charged in writing under oath or affirmation by or on behalf of a person or persons claiming to be aggrieved and such charge sets forth the facts upon which it is based that an employer, employment agency, or labor organization has engaged in an unlawful employment practice, the commission staff shall furnish such employer, employment agency, or labor organization with a copy of such charge within ten days, including a statement of the date, place, and circumstances of the alleged unlawful employment practice. Prior to initiating any investigation, the commission staff shall screen a charge pursuant to an established, clearly defined prescreening procedure to determine subject matter jurisdiction to handle such charge. Any charge without sufficient subject matter jurisdiction shall not be investigated and notice of such prescreening determination shall be promptly conveyed by the executive director to the person claiming to be aggrieved. When a charge is determined to be within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission, the commission staff shall make an investigation of such charge, but such charge shall not be made public by the commission.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 20 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Opinion No. (1996) (Nebraska Attorney General Reports 1996)“…to find that the agency lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1118 (1) (1993) provides: Prior to i…”
- Brown v. Regional West Med. Ctr. (Nebraska Supreme Court 2018, 300 Neb. 937)“…4 42 U.S.C. §§ 12117(a) and 2000e-5(e)(1) (2012); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1118(2) (Reissue 2010).…”
- Opinion No. (1993) (Nebraska Attorney General Reports 1993)“…he provisions of LB 124, 1993 Legislative Session, amending Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1118 (2) to lengthen the time in which a cla…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Chapter 84: STATE OFFICERS
§ 84-917Contested case; appeal; right to cross-appeal; procedureIn force
(1) Any person aggrieved by a final decision in a contested case, whether such decision is affirmative or negative in form, shall be entitled to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prevent resort to other means of review, redress, or relief provided by law. (2)(a)(i) Proceedings for review shall be instituted by filing a petition in the district court of the county where the action is taken within thirty days after the service of the final decision by the agency. All parties of record shall be made parties to the proceedings for review. A party of record for district court proceedings for review shall include any person who appeared either personally or through an attorney, who was a participant in the agency's contested hearing, and who was treated as a party by the agency's hearing officer. If an agency's only role in a contested case is to act as a neutral factfinding body, the agency shall not be a party of record. In all other cases, the agency shall be a party of record.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at nebraskalegislature.gov
Cited in 219 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Prokop v. Lower Loup Natural Res. Dist. (Nebraska Supreme Court 2019, 921 N.W.2d 375)“…Brief for appellant at 33. See § 46-750. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-917 (5)(a) (Reissue 2014). See Medi…”
- Glass v. NEB. DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLES (Nebraska Supreme Court 1995, 248 Neb. 501)“…ttorney General was not served with summons, as required by Neb.Rev.Stat. § 84-917(2)(a) (Reissue 1994), the district cour…”
- Meier v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES (Nebraska Supreme Court 1988, 227 Neb. 376)“…ineligibility in accordance with this dissenting opinion. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-917 (6) (Cum. Supp. 1984).…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Nebraska Legislature - State Government Effectiveness Act(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Rights and Responsibilities Under the State Government Effectiveness Act(nebraskalegislature.gov).gov
- Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Employment At-Will and Public Policy Exception (2025)(eslaw.com)
- OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program(whistleblowers.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Labor - Whistleblower Protections(dol.gov).gov
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2705 - Employee protections (State Government Effectiveness Act)(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2707 - Preliminary finding of violation; hearings; relief authorized; appeal; presumption(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 81-2709 - Employee; cause of action authorized; attorney's fees; presumption(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1114 - Opposition to unlawful practice; discrimination prohibited(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 48-1118 - Unlawful practice; charge; time for filing (three hundred days)(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 84-917 - Contested case; appeal; petition within thirty days of the final agency decision(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-207 - Four-year limitations period for torts and injuries to the rights of the plaintiff(nebraskalegislature.gov)
- Iowa Code 70A.28 - Prohibitions relating to certain actions by state employees(legis.iowa.gov)
- K.S.A. 75-2973 - Kansas state employee whistleblower protection(ksrevisor.gov)
Paid attorney referral. RecordingLaw may receive compensation when you use an attorney-help link. RecordingLaw is not a law firm. Submitting a request does not guarantee that an attorney will accept your case and does not create an attorney-client relationship.