Kansas
Kansas Whistleblower Laws: Protections and How to Report
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 14 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Kansas protects state employees from retaliation for reporting violations of law under the Kansas Whistleblower Act (K.S.A. 75-2973), and extends comparable coverage to municipal employees under HB 2160, effective July 1, 2025. Kansas common law also shields private-sector workers who report public health or safety violations.
Kansas workers who speak up about illegal activity, safety hazards, or government waste have legal protections against retaliation. Those protections come from a combination of state statutes, common law doctrines, and federal law.
This guide covers every major whistleblower protection available in Kansas, including the significant expansion that took effect in 2025 for municipal employees. You will find the specific statutes, who qualifies, what activities are protected, how to file a claim, the deadlines that apply, and the remedies available if an employer retaliates.
This is a summary of Kansas whistleblower laws. Make sure to also review the Federal Whistleblower Laws that apply to all U.S. workers.
Kansas Employment-at-Will Doctrine and Its Exceptions
Kansas is an employment-at-will state. That means an employer can terminate an employee for any reason, or for no reason at all, as long as the reason is not illegal. However, Kansas courts and the Kansas Legislature have carved out important exceptions that protect employees who blow the whistle on unlawful or dangerous conduct.

Those exceptions fall into two categories: common law protections developed by Kansas courts, and statutory protections enacted by the Legislature.
Common Law Whistleblower Protections in Kansas
Kansas courts recognize a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Under this exception, an employer cannot fire a worker for engaging in activities that Kansas public policy protects. Courts have specifically addressed two categories of protected activity.
Workers' Compensation Retaliation
It is against public policy for an employer to fire an employee in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim. To succeed on this claim, the employee must prove four elements:
- The employee filed a workers' compensation claim or the employer believed the employee intended to file one.
- The employee suffered an injury that was eligible for workers' compensation benefits.
- The employer knew about the injury and the claim.
- The termination was motivated by the filing or potential filing of the workers' compensation claim.
Kansas courts have extended this protection beyond termination. Employees who suffered suspension, demotion, or other adverse employment actions in connection with a workers' compensation claim have also received protection under this doctrine.
Whistleblowing Under Public Policy
Employers cannot fire an employee for reporting conduct by the employer or a co-worker that violates a rule, regulation, or statute related to public health and safety. Two conditions must be met for this protection to apply:
- The employee made the disclosure to a supervisor or a law enforcement agency.
- The employee identified the specific rule, regulation, or statute the employer allegedly violated.
An employee does not lose this protection if it turns out the employer did not actually break the law. As long as the employee acted in good faith and held a reasonable belief that a violation occurred, the public policy exception applies.
This common law protection is particularly important for private-sector workers in Kansas, because many of the state's statutory protections apply only to government employees.
Kansas Whistleblower Act (K.S.A. 75-2973)
The Kansas Whistleblower Act is the primary state statute protecting government employees who report wrongdoing. It applies to employees of Kansas state agencies.
Who Is Protected
The Act covers officers and employees of Kansas state agencies, including both classified and unclassified civil service employees. It does not cover private-sector workers or employees of cities, counties, or other local governments (those workers gained separate protections in 2025 under HB 2160, discussed below).
Protected Activities
Under the Kansas Whistleblower Act, no supervisor or appointing authority of a state agency may:
- Prohibit an employee from discussing operations of the state agency or other matters of public concern, including matters relating to public health, safety, and welfare, with any member of the Legislature or any auditing agency.
- Prohibit an employee from reporting any violation of state or federal law, rule, or regulation to any person, agency, or organization.
- Require an employee to give the supervisor prior notice before making such a report.
What Counts as Disciplinary Action
The Act defines "disciplinary action" broadly to include any dismissal, demotion, transfer, reassignment, suspension, reprimand, warning of possible dismissal, or withholding of work. This covers the full range of adverse employment actions an employer might take against a whistleblower.
How to File a Claim
The filing process depends on the employee's classification:
| Employee Type | Where to File | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Classified employee with permanent status | Kansas State Civil Service Board | 90 days after the retaliatory action |
| Unclassified employee | Court action under the Kansas Judicial Review Act | 90 days after the retaliatory action |
Both classified and unclassified employees have 90 days from the date of the alleged retaliatory action to file. Missing this deadline can result in losing the right to pursue the claim entirely.
Remedies and Penalties
The Kansas Whistleblower Act provides the exclusive remedy for state employee whistleblower retaliation claims. Available relief includes:
- The civil service board or court may modify or reverse the disciplinary action.
- The prevailing party may recover all or a portion of the costs of the proceedings, including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees.
- Individuals who violate the Act face suspension without pay for up to 30 days.
- For willful or repeated violations, the offending supervisor may be terminated and barred from state employment for up to 2 years.
Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act (HB 2160, Effective July 1, 2025)
On April 7, 2025, Governor Laura Kelly signed House Bill 2160 into law, creating the Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act. This law took effect on July 1, 2025, and filled a significant gap in Kansas whistleblower protections.
Why This Law Matters
Before HB 2160, Kansas whistleblower statutes only covered state-level employees. Workers employed by cities, counties, townships, and other local government bodies had no state statutory protection for reporting wrongdoing. They had to rely on common law claims or federal protections, both of which can be harder to pursue.
Who Is Protected
The Act covers officers and employees of Kansas municipalities, including cities, counties, townships, and other local government entities.
Protected Activities
Under the Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act, local government supervisors cannot take disciplinary action against an employee for:
- Discussing municipal operations or other matters of public concern with any member of the governing body of the municipality or any auditing agency.
- Reporting violations of federal, state, or local laws, regulations, or rules to any person, agency, or organization.
- Disclosing malfeasance (unlawful conduct by any member of the governing body or any officer or employee of the municipality) or misappropriation (unauthorized or unlawful expenditure or transfer of municipal funds).
The Act does not require employees to notify their supervisors before making a report.
Limitations
Employees are not protected if they knowingly spread false information, represent personal opinions as official municipal positions, or disclose information that is legally confidential.
Filing and Remedies
Any officer or employee who alleges retaliation in violation of the Act may bring a court action within 90 days of the alleged violation, seeking damages and any equitable relief the court considers necessary. The court may award the prevailing party all or a portion of costs, including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees.
If a governing body determines the disciplinary action was unreasonable, it must modify or reverse the action and order appropriate relief for the employee.
Additional Kansas Statutory Protections
Beyond the two whistleblower-specific acts, several other Kansas statutes include anti-retaliation provisions that protect employees who report specific types of wrongdoing.
Protection for Testimony Before the Secretary of Labor (K.S.A. 44-615)
It is illegal for any person, firm, or corporation to fire or discriminate against an employee because the employee:
- Testified or may testify as a witness before the Secretary of Labor.
- Signed a complaint or brought a matter of controversy between employer and employees to the Secretary's attention.
Employers who willfully violate this statute are guilty of a misdemeanor under K.S.A. 44-618. Penalties include a fine of up to $1,000, imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or both.
Kansas Act Against Discrimination (K.S.A. 44-1009)
The Kansas Act Against Discrimination prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who:
- Oppose discriminatory practices forbidden by the Act.
- File a complaint under the Act.
- Testify or participate in any proceeding under the Act.
The Act prohibits employment discrimination based on race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin, or ancestry. Retaliation complaints must be filed with the Kansas Human Rights Commission (KHRC) within 6 months of the retaliatory act. If the discrimination is part of a continuing pattern, the deadline runs from the last discriminatory act.
Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act (K.S.A. 44-1113)
The Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act protects individuals age 40 and older from employment discrimination. Employers cannot retaliate against employees who:
- Oppose practices prohibited by the Act.
- File a complaint under the Act.
- Testify or participate in any proceeding under the Act.
Retaliation complaints must be filed with the KHRC within 6 months. Alternatively, employees may file a wrongful discharge lawsuit in court within 2 years of the retaliatory action.
Reporting Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation (K.S.A. 39-1403)
K.S.A. 39-1403 protects employees who report or participate in investigations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of adults in care facilities, adult family homes, or adults needing protective services. Under this statute:
- Employers cannot discharge, alter terms of employment, or discriminate against an employee for making a report.
- Employees who participate in related investigations or proceedings are also protected.
- Anyone making a report or participating in an investigation is immune from civil liability, unless the person acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose.
- The identity of the person making the report is kept confidential unless the reporter consents to disclosure or a judicial or administrative proceeding results.
Healthcare Malpractice Reporting (K.S.A. 65-4928)
K.S.A. 65-4928 prohibits employers from firing or discriminating against an employee for reporting:
- Conditions that fall below the applicable standard of care and have a reasonable probability of causing injury to a patient.
- Acts that would be grounds for disciplinary action by an appropriate licensing agency.
Employees who experience retaliation may recover damages for lost wages and benefits, plus a civil penalty not exceeding the total amount of compensatory damages. The statute of limitations for filing a claim is 2 years from the retaliatory action.
Occupational Safety and Health (K.S.A. 44-636)
K.S.A. 44-636 prohibits employers from firing or discriminating against employees who:
- File a complaint with the Secretary of Labor about unsafe or hazardous conditions.
- Furnish information to the Secretary of Labor concerning such conditions.
Willful violations of this statute are a misdemeanor. Penalties include fines ranging from $25 to $100 per day the violation remains uncorrected, with each day constituting a separate offense.
Federal Whistleblower Protections for Kansas Workers
Kansas state whistleblower statutes primarily protect government employees. Private-sector workers in Kansas can turn to several federal laws for protection.
Federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3729-3733)
The False Claims Act allows any person, including private-sector employees, to file a qui tam lawsuit on behalf of the federal government against an employer that has defrauded a government program. Whistleblowers who file successful qui tam actions may receive between 15% and 30% of the government's recovery. The Act also prohibits retaliation against employees who file or assist with False Claims Act actions.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act protects employees of publicly traded companies who report securities fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, or bank fraud. Employees must file a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 180 days of the retaliatory action.
Other Federal Protections
Additional federal laws that protect Kansas workers include:
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act for reporting securities violations to the SEC.
- Occupational Safety and Health Act (federal OSHA) for reporting workplace safety hazards.
- Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act for reporting environmental violations.
- National Labor Relations Act for reporting unfair labor practices.
Retaliation Claims: Deadlines Summary
Filing deadlines vary by statute. Missing a deadline can permanently bar a claim.
| Statute | Filing Deadline | Where to File |
|---|---|---|
| Kansas Whistleblower Act (K.S.A. 75-2973) | 90 days | Civil Service Board (classified) or court (unclassified) |
| Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act (HB 2160) | 90 days | Court of competent jurisdiction |
| Kansas Act Against Discrimination (K.S.A. 44-1009) | 6 months | Kansas Human Rights Commission |
| Kansas Age Discrimination (K.S.A. 44-1113) | 6 months (KHRC) or 2 years (court) | KHRC or court |
| Testimony Before Secretary of Labor (K.S.A. 44-615) | 2 years (general statute of limitations) | Court |
| Healthcare Malpractice Reporting (K.S.A. 65-4928) | 2 years | Court |
| Common law retaliation claims | 2 years | Court |
| Federal False Claims Act | 3 years from retaliation | Court |
| Sarbanes-Oxley Act | 180 days | OSHA |
Remedies for Retaliation in Kansas
The remedies available depend on which statute applies. Unless a specific statute states otherwise, employees who prove retaliation may be entitled to:
- Reinstatement to their previous job position.
- Restoration of full fringe benefits and seniority.
- Back pay for lost wages and benefits.
- Litigation costs and reasonable attorney fees.
- Punitive damages in appropriate cases.
- Any other compensation the court considers appropriate.
Penalties by Statute
| Statute | Penalties for Violators |
|---|---|
| Kansas Whistleblower Act | Suspension without pay up to 30 days; termination and bar from state employment up to 2 years for willful or repeated violations |
| Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act | Damages, equitable relief, attorney fees, and costs |
| K.S.A. 44-615 (Secretary of Labor testimony) | Misdemeanor: fine up to $1,000 and/or up to 1 year in county jail |
| K.S.A. 65-4928 (Healthcare malpractice) | Compensatory damages for lost wages/benefits plus a civil penalty up to the compensatory damages amount |
| K.S.A. 44-636 (Occupational safety) | Misdemeanor: fine of $25 to $100 per day of uncorrected violation |
Where to Report Whistleblower Retaliation in Kansas
Here are the key agencies and their contact information for filing whistleblower or retaliation complaints:
- Kansas Human Rights Commission (KHRC): For discrimination and age discrimination retaliation complaints. Phone: (785) 296-3206. Website: www.khrc.net
- Kansas Department of Administration, Division of Personnel Services: For state employee whistleblower claims under K.S.A. 75-2973. Phone: (785) 296-4278.
- Kansas Department of Labor: For workplace safety retaliation complaints and general employment retaliation matters. Phone: (785) 296-0901.
- U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA: For federal whistleblower claims. Phone: 1-800-321-6742. Website: www.osha.gov/whistleblower
How to Strengthen a Kansas Whistleblower Claim
Workers who believe they may need to report wrongdoing should take steps to protect themselves:
-
Document everything. Keep copies of emails, memos, reports, and any evidence related to the violation you are reporting. Note dates, times, and the names of people involved.
-
Report through the proper channels. Under Kansas common law, reports should go to a supervisor or law enforcement. Under the statutory protections, reports can go to legislators, auditing agencies, or any person or organization.
-
Put it in writing. Written reports create a record that is harder for an employer to dispute later.
-
Identify the specific law or rule. Kansas common law requires that the employee identify the specific statute, rule, or regulation the employer allegedly violated. Being specific strengthens both common law and statutory claims.
-
Act quickly. The 90-day deadline under the Kansas Whistleblower Act and Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act is short. Consult an attorney as soon as possible after experiencing retaliation.
-
Keep records of retaliation. If your employer takes adverse action after your report, document the timeline showing the connection between your report and the retaliation.
More Kansas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Kansas Whistleblower Act protect private-sector employees?
No. The Kansas Whistleblower Act (K.S.A. 75-2973) applies only to employees of Kansas state agencies. Private-sector employees may rely on Kansas common law public policy protections for reporting violations of public health and safety laws, or on federal statutes like the False Claims Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
What is the deadline for filing a whistleblower retaliation claim in Kansas?
The deadline depends on the statute. Under the Kansas Whistleblower Act and the Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act, the deadline is 90 days from the retaliatory action. Discrimination retaliation claims filed with the Kansas Human Rights Commission must be filed within 6 months. Common law claims and healthcare malpractice reporting claims have a 2-year statute of limitations.
Are municipal employees now protected under Kansas whistleblower law?
Yes. Governor Kelly signed the Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act (HB 2160) on April 7, 2025, and it took effect on July 1, 2025. This law protects employees of cities, counties, townships, and other local government entities from retaliation for reporting violations of law, malfeasance, or misappropriation of funds.
Can I be fired for filing a workers' compensation claim in Kansas?
No. Kansas courts have established under the public policy exception that firing an employee in retaliation for filing or intending to file a workers' compensation claim violates public policy. You must be able to show that the employer knew about your claim and that your termination was motivated by the claim.
What remedies are available if my employer retaliates against me for whistleblowing in Kansas?
Remedies vary by statute but can include reinstatement to your former position, back pay for lost wages and benefits, restoration of seniority and fringe benefits, reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs, and punitive damages. Under the Kansas Whistleblower Act, the offending supervisor may also face suspension without pay or termination from state employment.
Updates
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Added the bad-faith/malicious-purpose exception to the K.S.A. 39-1403 civil-immunity claim; the statute's immunity is conditional, not absolute.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 75: STATE DEPARTMENTS; PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
§ 75-2973Kansas whistleblower act; state employee communications with legislators, legislative committees, auditing agencies and others; prohibited acts; relief and appeals, costs.In force
(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas whistleblower act. (b) As used in this section: (1) "Auditing agency" means the (A) legislative post auditor, (B) any employee of the division of post audit, (C) any firm performing audit services pursuant to a contract with the post auditor, (D) any state agency or federal agency or authority performing auditing or other oversight activities under authority of any provision of law authorizing such activities, or (E) the inspector general created under K.S.A. 75-7427, and amendments thereto. (2) "Disciplinary action" means any dismissal, demotion, transfer, reassignment, suspension, reprimand, warning of possible dismissal or withholding of work. (3) "State agency" and "firm" have the meanings provided by K.S.A. 46-1112, and amendments thereto. (c) No supervisor or appointing authority of any state agency shall prohibit any employee of the state agency from discussing the operations of the state agency or other matters of public concern, including matters relating to the public health, safety and welfare either specifically or generally, with any member of the legislature or any auditing agency.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-10 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 11 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2016
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kansas Department of Revenue v. Powell (Supreme Court of Kansas 2010, 290 Kan. 564)“…ialize.” The court also observed that the plain language of K.S.A. 75-2973(f) did not require die Board to award t…”
- Connelly v. Kansas Highway Patrol (Supreme Court of Kansas 2001, 271 Kan. 944)“…o three of the troopers under the Kansas Whistleblower Act, K.S.A. 75-2973, and in entering judgment in favor of t…”
- Prager v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue (Supreme Court of Kansas 2001, 271 Kan. 1)“…nsas Civil Service Board contending his suspension violated K.S.A. 75-2973, the Kansas “whistleblower” statute.…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 44: LABOR AND INDUSTRIES
§ 44-1009Unlawful employment practices; unlawful discriminatory practices.In forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice: (1) For an employer, because of the race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin or ancestry of any person to refuse to hire or employ such person to bar or discharge such person from employment or to otherwise discriminate against such person in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment; to limit, segregate, separate, classify or make any distinction in regards to employees; or to follow any employment procedure or practice which, in fact, results in discrimination, segregation or separation without a valid business necessity. (2) For a labor organization, because of the race, religion, color, sex, disability, national origin or ancestry of any person, to exclude or to expel from its membership such person or to discriminate in any way against any of its members or against any employer or any person employed by an employer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 67 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Kansas Commission on Civil Rights v. Howard (Supreme Court of Kansas 1975, 218 Kan. 248)“…same act virtually the identical language was also added to K.S.A. 44-1009 (L. 1972, ch. 194, § 7). As amended, th…”
- Stephens v. Unified School District No. 500 (Supreme Court of Kansas 1975, 218 Kan. 220)“…constituted an unlawful employment practice in violation of K.S.A. 44-1009 ( a ) (1). An investigating commissio…”
- Garvey Elevators, Inc. v. Kansas Human Rights Commission (Supreme Court of Kansas 1998, 265 Kan. 484)“…vironment constituted an unlawful employment practice under K.S.A. 44-1009(a). 24 Kan. App. 2d at 603 .…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Kansas Background Check Laws (2026 Guide)
§ 44-1113Unlawful employment practices based on age.In force
(a) It is an unlawful employment practice based on age to engage in any of the following acts in any manner which would limit, deprive or tend to deprive any person of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect the person's status as an employee or applicant for employment: (1) For an employer, because of the age of a person, to refuse to hire or employ the person, to bar or discharge the person from employment or to otherwise discriminate against the person in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment; to limit, segregate, separate, classify or make any distinction in regard to employees because of age without a valid business motive. (2) For an employer to reduce the wage rate of any employee in order to comply with the Kansas age discrimination in employment act. (3) For a labor organization, because of the age of a person, to exclude or to expel the person from its membership or to discriminate in any way against any of its members or against any employer or any person employed by an employer because of age.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2024
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Kansas Human Rights Commission (Supreme Court of Kansas 1993, 254 Kan. 270)“…s termination were mere pretexts for discrimination. K.S.A. 44-1113(a)(l), at the times pertinent herein, p…”
- Attorney General Opinion No. (Kansas Attorney General Reports 1997)“…ffect the person's status as an applicant for employment." K.S.A. 44-1113 . One of these prohibited employment p…”
- Lawrence v. First Kansas Bank & Trust Co. (District Court, D. Kansas 1996, 169 F.R.D. 657)“…44-1110 et seq., to the appropriate parties and violates K.S.A. §§ 44-1113(5) and 44-1009(4). 72. An implied emp…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 44-636Places of business; inspection; safety and protection of employees; orders; notice and hearing; penalty.In force
(a) The secretary of labor shall have power to enter any factory or mill, workshop, private works, public works or state agency or institution, mercantile establishment, laundry or any other place of business where labor is or is intended to be performed for any purpose, when the same are open or in operation, for the purpose of gathering facts and statistics such as are contemplated by this act, and to examine into the methods of protection from danger to employees and the sanitary conditions in and around such buildings and places and to keep a record thereof of such inspection.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 4 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2020
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Palmer v. Brown (Supreme Court of Kansas 1988, 242 Kan. 893)“…ful working conditions to the secretary of human resources, K.S.A. 44-636(f). K.S.A. 44-831 states an employee ha…”
- Williams v. CoreCivic, Inc. (District Court, D. Kansas 2019)“…duct at the LDC that “is illegal under Kansas law,” citing K.S.A. § 44-636(a), including “safety issues, staff be…”
- Ross v. Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC (District Court, D. Kansas 2020)“…concerns.” The first of plaintiff’s cited provisions is Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-636, which provides the secretary of labor…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 44-618Penalties for violating K.S.A. 44-601 through 44-628.In force
Any person willfully violating the provisions of this act, or any valid order of the secretary of labor, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof in any court of competent jurisdiction of this state shall be punished by a fine of not to exceed $1,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not to exceed one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
§ 44-615Unlawful acts against witnesses and litigants.In force
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to discharge any employee or to discriminate in any way against any employee because of the fact that any such employee may testify as a witness before the secretary of labor, or shall sign any complaint or shall be in any way instrumental in bringing to the attention of the secretary of labor any matter of controversy between employers and employees as provided herein. It shall also be unlawful for any two or more persons, by conspiring or confederating together, to injure in any manner any other person or persons, or any corporation, in their, or its business, labor, enterprise, or peace and security, by boycott, by discrimination, by picketing, by advertising, by propaganda, or other means, because of any action taken by any such person or persons, or any corporation, under any order of the secretary of labor, or because of any action or proceeding instituted before the secretary, or because any such person or persons, or corporation, shall have invoked the jurisdiction of the secretary in any matter provided for herein.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 9 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Palmer v. Brown (Supreme Court of Kansas 1988, 242 Kan. 893)“…b); for testifying before the secretary of human resources, K.S.A. 44-615; or for reporting unsafe or unlawful wo…”
- Campbell v. Husky Hogs, L.L.C. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2011, 292 Kan. 225)“…erfere with unemployment compensation hearings” by enacting K.S.A. 44-615. 620 F. Supp. at 1269 . But the rele…”
- Conrad v. Board of Johnson County Commissioners (District Court, D. Kansas 2002, 237 F. Supp. 2d 1204)“…g; court’s holding based on strong public policy evinced by K.S.A. 44-615, which makes it unlawful for employer t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 65: PUBLIC HEALTH
§ 65-4928Employer retribution for reporting; prohibition; remedy.In force
(a) No employer shall discharge or otherwise discriminate against any employee for making any report pursuant to K.S.A. 65-4923 or 65-4924. (b) Any employer who violates the provisions of subsection (a) shall be liable to the aggrieved employee for damages for any wages or other benefits lost due to the discharge or discrimination plus a civil penalty in an amount not exceeding the amount of such damages. Such damages and civil penalty shall be recoverable in an individual action brought by the aggrieved employee. If the aggrieved employee substantially prevails on any of the allegations contained in the pleadings in an action allowed by this section, the court, in its discretion, may allow the employee reasonable attorney fees as part of the costs.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 8 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Goodman v. Wesley Medical Center, L.L.C. (Supreme Court of Kansas 2003, 276 Kan. 586)“…e licensing agency.” K.S.A. 65-4921(1); see K.S.A. 65-4923. K.S.A. 65-4928 protects health care providers from dis…”
- Anglemyer v. Hamilton County Hospital (District Court, D. Kansas 1994, 848 F. Supp. 938)“…authorized because plaintiff alleges it was in violation of K.S.A. § 65-4928, which prohibits retaliation against em…”
- Feldkamp v. The University of Kansas Hospital Authority (District Court, D. Kansas 2025)“…and Kansas state law wrongful termination in violation of K.S.A. § 65-4928. This matter is now before the Court o…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Kansas Statutes Annotated, Chapter 39: DEPENDENT PERSONS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES; SOCIAL WELFARE
§ 39-1403Same; immunity from liability of certain persons; employer prohibited from imposing sanctions on employee making report.In force
(a) Anyone participating in the making of any report pursuant to this act, or in any follow-up activity to or investigation of such report or any other report of abuse, neglect or exploitation of an adult or who testifies in any administrative or judicial proceeding arising from such report shall not be subject to any civil liability on account of such report, investigation or testimony, unless such person acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose. (b) No employer shall terminate the employment of, prevent or impair the practice or occupation of or impose any other sanction on any employee solely for the reason that such employee made or caused to be made a report under this act.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ksrevisor.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 1988
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Palmer v. Brown (Supreme Court of Kansas 1988, 242 Kan. 893)“…525; for reporting abuse of certain adults in need of care, K.S.A. 39-1403(b), 39-1423(b); for testifying before t…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- K.S.A. 75-2973: Kansas Whistleblower Act(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- HB 2160: Municipal Employee Whistleblower Act (2025)(kslegislature.gov).gov
- Governor Kelly Signs Bipartisan Bill Expanding Whistleblower Protections to Local Government Employees(governor.ks.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 44-1009: Kansas Act Against Discrimination, Unlawful Employment Practices(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 44-1113: Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 44-636: Occupational Safety and Health Whistleblower Protections(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 44-615: Protection for Testimony Before the Secretary of Labor(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 44-618: Penalty for Violations of Labor Testimony Protection(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- K.S.A. 39-1403: Protection for Reporting Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation(ksrevisor.gov).gov
- Kansas Human Rights Commission: Filing a Complaint(khrc.net).gov
- OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program(osha.gov).gov
- U.S. Department of Justice: False Claims Act Statistics(justice.gov).gov
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Protections(whistleblowers.gov).gov
- Kansas DCF: Report Adult Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation(dcf.ks.gov).gov