Texas
Texas Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 17, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 17, 2026. · 6 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Texas Occupations Code Section 2301.604 protects new-vehicle buyers when a warranty defect persists after a reasonable number of repair attempts: it requires the manufacturer to reimburse reasonable incidental costs and either replace the vehicle or refund the full purchase price. Section 2301.605 supplies the rebuttable presumption that proves the "reasonable number of attempts" element, and buyers satisfy it through one of three tests: four attempts for the same defect, two attempts for a serious safety hazard, or 30 cumulative days out of service within 24 months or 24,000 miles.
Overview of the Texas Lemon Law
The Texas Lemon Law is a consumer protection statute that helps buyers and lessees of new motor vehicles when their vehicle has a defect covered by the manufacturer's warranty that cannot be fixed after a reasonable number of repair attempts. The law is codified in Texas Occupations Code Chapter 2301, Subchapter M (sections 2301.601 through 2301.613).

The Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (TxDMV) administers the lemon law program. TxDMV handles complaints, conducts hearings, and issues final orders. The process is designed so consumers can participate without hiring an attorney, although legal representation is permitted.
Texas first enacted its lemon law in 1983, with enforcement beginning in 1985. The Legislature has amended the law several times since then, including adding coverage for towable recreational vehicles (TRVs) in 1997.
What Vehicles Are Covered
Texas has one of the broader lemon laws in terms of vehicle coverage. The law protects consumers who purchase or lease various types of new vehicles from licensed Texas dealers.
Covered Vehicle Types
- Passenger cars: Sedans, coupes, hatchbacks, and similar vehicles
- Trucks: Pickup trucks and commercial trucks
- Vans: Passenger and cargo vans
- SUVs and crossovers: All sport utility vehicles
- Motorcycles: Street-legal motorcycles
- All-terrain vehicles (ATVs): Off-road vehicles
- Motor homes: Self-propelled recreational vehicles
- Towable recreational vehicles (TRVs): Travel trailers and fifth wheels
- Neighborhood electric vehicles: Low-speed electric vehicles
Vehicles Not Covered
- Used vehicles, for purposes of a refund or replacement (repair assistance through TxDMV may still be available if the vehicle is under the manufacturer's original warranty, and the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act may also apply; see Used Vehicle Protections below)
- Vehicles purchased at auction, including repossessed vehicles
- Non-travel trailers
- Boats and watercraft
- Farm equipment and tractors
- Vehicles with defects caused by owner abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications
Requirements for Coverage
To qualify for Texas lemon law protection, you and the vehicle must meet these criteria:
- You are an "owner" as Section 2301.601(2) defines the term. That definition is disjunctive, so more than one route qualifies: you purchased the vehicle at retail from a license holder; you are a lessor or lessee (other than a sublessee) who purchased or leased it from a license holder; you are a resident of Texas and have registered the vehicle in Texas; you purchased or leased at retail and are an active-duty service member stationed in Texas when the proceeding begins; or you are a transferee or assignee of one of those people, are a Texas resident, and registered the vehicle here. A Texas resident who bought the vehicle new out of state and then registered it in Texas can qualify under the residency route.
- Covered by a manufacturer's written warranty
- The defect was reported during the warranty period
- The problem substantially impairs the vehicle's use or market value, or creates a serious safety hazard
Texas Lemon Law Presumption Tests
Texas law establishes a "rebuttable presumption" that the manufacturer has had a reasonable number of repair attempts if any one of three tests is met. The manufacturer can try to overcome this presumption, but the burden shifts to them once a test is satisfied.
Under Section 2301.605 of the Texas Occupations Code, a vehicle qualifies under one of the following tests.
Test 1: The Four Times Test
This test applies when the same defect has been subject to repair four or more times and continues to exist.
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Repair Attempts | Vehicle presented for repair of the same defect at least 4 times before the earlier of: the warranty expiration date, or 24 months or 24,000 miles after original delivery (whichever comes first) |
| Problem Status | The same nonconformity continues to exist after these four or more attempts |
Test 2: Serious Safety Hazard Test
This test applies to defects that either substantially impede a person's ability to control or operate the vehicle for ordinary use or intended purposes, or create a substantial risk of fire or explosion.
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Repair Attempts | Vehicle presented for repair of the serious safety hazard at least 2 times before the earlier of: the warranty expiration date, or 24 months or 24,000 miles after original delivery (whichever comes first) |
| Problem Status | The serious safety hazard continues to exist |
A "serious safety hazard" under the statute means a life-threatening malfunction or nonconformity that either substantially impedes a person's ability to control or operate the vehicle for ordinary use or its intended purposes, or creates a substantial risk of fire or explosion.
Test 3: The 30-Day Out-of-Service Test
This test focuses on the total time the vehicle has been unavailable due to warranty repairs.
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Days Out of Service | Vehicle out of service for warranty repairs for a cumulative total of 30 or more days |
| Time Period | Within the first 24 months or 24,000 miles of ownership (whichever comes first) |
| Loaner Vehicle | Days do not count if the manufacturer provided a comparable loaner vehicle |
Written Notice Requirement
Before a vehicle can qualify under any test, the owner must:
- Notify the manufacturer in writing describing the defect
- Give the manufacturer at least one opportunity to repair the vehicle after providing that written notice
This written notice requirement is separate from taking the vehicle to a dealer. The notice must go directly to the manufacturer, converter, or distributor.
Special Rules for Towable Recreational Vehicles
Towable recreational vehicles (TRVs) follow the same general lemon law framework, but with a few important differences:
- Mileage limits do not apply because TRVs typically do not have odometers. Time-based deadlines still apply.
- The TRV must be titled and registered in Texas to qualify for lemon law protection.
- Filing deadlines are based on time from purchase and warranty expiration, not mileage.
TRV owners follow the same complaint and hearing process as other vehicle owners.
Consumer Remedies: Repair, Replacement, or Repurchase
Occupations Code Section 2301.604 is the source of the remedy: a manufacturer, converter, or distributor that cannot conform the vehicle to its express warranty after a reasonable number of attempts must reimburse the owner's reasonable incidental costs and either replace the vehicle with a comparable one or take it back and refund the full purchase price, less a reasonable allowance for use. When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under Texas law, the TxDMV hearings examiner issues a final order directing that remedy. Under 43 Tex. Admin. Code Section 224.260, the hearings examiner accommodates the complainant's preference for replacement or repurchase to the extent possible.
Possible Remedies
- Repair: Order the manufacturer to make additional repair attempts
- Repurchase (Buyback): Manufacturer buys back the vehicle from the consumer
- Replacement: Manufacturer provides a comparable new vehicle
- Trade assistance: Help trading in the vehicle for a different model
- Service contracts: Extended warranty coverage
- Monetary compensation: Cash payment for diminished value or other losses
Repurchase Calculation
If the TxDMV orders a repurchase, the manufacturer must refund:
- Full purchase price of the vehicle
- Sales tax paid
- License and registration fees
- Reimbursement of the lemon law complaint filing fee you paid
- Reasonable towing and rental car expenses incurred because of the defect
Interest and finance charges are not refunded. Under 43 Tex. Admin. Code Section 224.260(b)(1), the purchase price used to calculate the refund is the total purchase price of the vehicle "excluding the amount of any interest, finance charge, or insurance premiums," and the refund "shall include reimbursement of the amount of the lemon law complaint filing fee." Occupations Code Section 2301.712(b) says the same thing from the other direction: if the complainant prevails, the nonprevailing party reimburses the filing fee. TxDMV states the same rule in plainer terms: the buyback is the purchase price including taxes, title, and license fee, minus the use allowance, and it "does not include any interest paid on the vehicle." If you financed the vehicle, plan on getting back the price you paid for it, not the interest you paid the lender.
Mileage Offset Formula
The manufacturer may deduct a reasonable use offset based on the miles driven. Under 43 Tex. Admin. Code Section 224.260, the offset has two components:
Part A (pre-report miles): Purchase Price x (Miles at First Report of Defect / 120,000)
Part B (post-report miles): 50% x Purchase Price x (Miles from First Report to Hearing Date / 120,000)
Total Offset = Part A + Part B
For example, on a $45,000 vehicle: if you had 3,000 miles at first report and drove 2,000 more miles by the hearing date, the offset would be ($45,000 x 3,000 / 120,000) + (50% x $45,000 x 2,000 / 120,000) = $1,125 + $375 = $1,500. The manufacturer would refund $45,000 minus $1,500, plus taxes, fees, and other eligible expenses.
The denominator of 120,000 represents the estimated average useful life of a motor vehicle in miles.
Replacement Requirements
If replacement is ordered, the new vehicle must be:
- Identical or substantially similar to the original
- The same model year or newer
- Equipped with similar options and features
How to File a Lemon Law Complaint in Texas
Texas provides an administrative process through TxDMV that does not require an attorney. Here is the step-by-step process.
Step 1: Document Everything
Thorough documentation is the foundation of a strong lemon law claim. Keep records of:
- All repair orders showing dates, mileage, and work performed
- Copies of all written correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- A log of dates when the vehicle was out of service
- Phone call records (date, time, person you spoke with, what was discussed)
- Photos or videos of the defect
Step 2: Notify the Manufacturer in Writing
Send written notice directly to the manufacturer describing:
- The defect or condition
- Your vehicle information (year, make, model, VIN)
- A summary of the repair history
- A request for the manufacturer to repair the problem
Keep a copy of this notice and send it by certified mail so you have proof of delivery.
Step 3: Allow an Additional Repair Opportunity
After providing written notice, give the manufacturer at least one more opportunity to fix the vehicle before filing a complaint with TxDMV.
Step 4: File a Complaint with TxDMV
If the problem remains unresolved, file a lemon law complaint with the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles:
- Complete the complaint form online through the TxDMV Motor Vehicle Dealer Online Complaint System or download the paper form
- Include the $35 filing fee (required if you are seeking a repurchase or replacement; not required if you are only requesting repairs)
- Attach copies of all repair orders
- Include copies of correspondence with the manufacturer
- Provide records of phone calls and other communications
Step 5: TxDMV Review and Mediation
After you file your complaint:
- TxDMV staff reviews the complaint for completeness and eligibility
- A case advisor is assigned to your complaint
- TxDMV contacts the manufacturer and attempts mediation between the parties
- A state-employed technical expert may be sent to inspect the vehicle and attempt a repair
- If mediation does not resolve the complaint, the case is referred for a formal hearing
The TxDMV Hearing Process
If mediation fails, the state conducts a formal administrative hearing. While less formal than a court trial, proper preparation is important.
Hearing Preparation
- Organize all documentation (repair orders, correspondence, photos, videos) in chronological order
- Arrange for witnesses who have observed the problems
- Have your vehicle available for inspection and test drive
- Prepare a clear timeline of events from purchase to the present
What You Must Prove at the Hearing
- You are an "owner" under Section 2301.601(2), by purchase or lease from a license holder, by Texas residency plus Texas registration, by qualifying military status, or as a qualifying transferee
- You still own or lease the vehicle
- The defect is covered by the manufacturer's warranty
- You gave the manufacturer a reasonable number of repair attempts
- You notified the manufacturer in writing and provided at least one repair opportunity after that notice
- The problem substantially impairs the vehicle's use or market value, or creates a serious safety hazard
Hearing Decision
The hearings examiner issues a final written decision within 60 days after the close of the hearing. Either party may challenge the final order by filing a motion for rehearing with TxDMV.
If you disagree with the final decision, you may pursue the matter in state court.
Manufacturer Defenses
Manufacturers may raise defenses at the hearing to avoid liability. Understanding these defenses helps you prepare a stronger case.
| Defense | Manufacturer's Argument | How to Counter It |
|---|---|---|
| No defect exists | Vehicle operates as designed | Provide repair orders, expert testimony, and documentation of recurring problems |
| Minor defect | Problem does not substantially impair the vehicle | Document how the defect affects daily use, safety, or resale value |
| No safety hazard | Issue is inconvenient but not dangerous | Provide evidence of risk to occupants or other drivers |
| Owner abuse or neglect | Consumer caused the problem | Show maintenance records and evidence of proper use |
| Unauthorized modifications | Aftermarket parts caused the issue | Prove the defect existed before the modification or is unrelated to it |
| Insufficient repair attempts | Consumer did not give enough chances to fix the vehicle | Present a complete repair history showing all attempts |
Filing Deadlines
Texas lemon law claims must be filed within strict time limits. Missing these deadlines means you lose access to the TxDMV administrative process.
| Deadline Type | Time Limit |
|---|---|
| Filing deadline | Within 6 months after the earlier of: the manufacturer's express warranty expiration date, or 24 months/24,000 miles after delivery |
For towable recreational vehicles, the mileage component does not apply, so the deadline is based on time from purchase and warranty expiration only.
Report defects to the dealer and manufacturer as soon as you notice them. Earlier reporting creates a stronger paper trail and helps ensure you meet all deadlines.
Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act Overlay
The federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.) operates as a backstop for Texas vehicle owners in two important ways. First, it covers any vehicle that carries an unexpired written warranty, including used vehicles that the state lemon law would otherwise exclude, and 15 U.S.C. 2304 sets the federal minimum standards a full written warranty must meet, including a refund or replacement after a reasonable number of failed repair attempts. Second, the remedies section, 15 U.S.C. 2310(d), lets a consumer damaged by a breach of a written or implied warranty sue in state or federal court, and a consumer who finally prevails "may be allowed by the court" to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees as part of the judgment. That fee award is discretionary with the court, not automatic, but it is why many Texas lemon law attorneys accept these cases on contingency.
The state process and the federal remedy run on parallel tracks. Filing a TxDMV complaint does not forfeit your Magnuson-Moss rights, and pursuing Magnuson-Moss claims does not prevent a later TxDMV filing, as long as the administrative deadlines have not expired.
Used Vehicle Protections
Only new vehicles can qualify for a refund or replacement under the Texas lemon law. That is a limit on the remedy, not a blanket exclusion of used vehicles from state law, and the free state option is usually the first one a used-vehicle owner should try.
Start With TxDMV Warranty Performance Repair Assistance
TxDMV tells used-vehicle owners that Texas warranty performance law may still cover them. In the agency's words, your used vehicle may be covered "if it is still covered by the manufacturer's original warranty (not an extended service contract), or if the defect started and was reported to the dealer while under the manufacturer's original warranty and the defect continues to exist," in which case "repair assistance for that problem may be available to you."
The statutory hook is Occupations Code Section 2301.603, which requires a manufacturer, converter, or distributor to make the repairs necessary to conform a vehicle to the applicable express warranty. Subsection (b) keeps that duty alive after the warranty expires if the owner reported the nonconformity during the warranty term. This runs through the same TxDMV complaint process described above. Only new vehicles can qualify for a refund or replacement, so repair is the remedy on the table here, and confirming the current fee and form requirements with TxDMV before you file is worth the phone call.
Alternative Protections for Used Vehicle Buyers
- Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act: Covers any vehicle with an unexpired manufacturer warranty or third-party service contract. Under 15 U.S.C. 2310(d), consumers may sue in state or federal court, and a court may award a prevailing consumer reasonable costs and attorney fees.
- Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA): Prohibits false, misleading, or deceptive acts in consumer transactions. If a dealer concealed a known defect or misrepresented the vehicle's condition, the DTPA may provide a remedy.
- Common law claims: Breach of warranty, fraud, or misrepresentation claims may be brought in state court.
- Dealer disclosure requirements: Texas dealers must disclose known defects and provide accurate vehicle history information.
Title Branding for Buyback Vehicles
Texas requires that vehicles bought back under the lemon law receive a branded title indicating their lemon history. When purchasing a used vehicle, always check the title and request a vehicle history report to look for lemon law buyback designations.
Tips for Strengthening Your Lemon Law Claim
Following these best practices can improve your chances of a favorable outcome:
- Report defects early. The sooner you report a problem, the more time you have to meet the presumption tests and filing deadlines.
- Always use authorized dealers for repairs. Repairs performed by independent mechanics may not count toward the lemon law presumption.
- Get detailed repair orders. Make sure each repair order describes the specific complaint, the diagnosis, and the work performed. Review the paperwork before you leave the dealership.
- Keep a repair journal. Note every date the vehicle was dropped off, picked up, and any days it was undrivable.
- Send written notice by certified mail. This creates a verifiable record that you notified the manufacturer as required by law.
- Do not make unauthorized modifications. Aftermarket parts or modifications give the manufacturer a defense argument.
- Continue making loan or lease payments. Filing a lemon law claim does not excuse you from your financial obligations. Failure to pay could result in repossession.
More Texas Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Texas lemon law cover used vehicles?
Only new vehicles can qualify for a refund or replacement. Used vehicles are not shut out of state law entirely: TxDMV says Texas warranty performance law may cover a used vehicle that is still under the manufacturer's original warranty (not an extended service contract), or where the defect began and was reported to the dealer during that original warranty and still exists, and repair assistance may be available through the same TxDMV complaint process. Occupations Code Section 2301.603 is the repair duty behind that. Used vehicle buyers may also have recourse through the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act if the vehicle has an unexpired warranty, or through the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act if the dealer engaged in fraud or misrepresentation.
How much does it cost to file a Texas lemon law complaint?
The filing fee is $35, payable to the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles. This fee is required if you are seeking a repurchase or replacement. If you are only requesting that the manufacturer make additional repairs, the fee is not required.
Do I need a lawyer to file a Texas lemon law claim?
No. The TxDMV administrative process is designed so consumers can participate without an attorney. However, manufacturers typically have legal representation at hearings, so consulting with a lemon law attorney may improve your chances. For federal Magnuson-Moss claims, attorneys often work on contingency because 15 U.S.C. 2310(d)(2) lets a court award a prevailing consumer's reasonable costs and attorney fees, though that award is discretionary with the court rather than automatic.
What is the difference between the Four Times Test and the 30-Day Test?
The Four Times Test counts the number of repair attempts for the same defect: at least four attempts before the earlier of warranty expiration or 24 months/24,000 miles from delivery. The 30-Day Test measures total time out of service for any warranty repairs: 30 or more cumulative days within the first 24 months or 24,000 miles. A vehicle only needs to pass one test to qualify.
How is the mileage offset calculated in a Texas lemon law repurchase?
The offset has two parts under 43 Tex. Admin. Code Section 224.260. Part A covers miles driven before you first reported the defect: Purchase Price x (miles at first report / 120,000). Part B covers 50% of miles driven from first report to the hearing date: 50% x Purchase Price x (post-report miles / 120,000). The total offset is Part A plus Part B, and the result is subtracted from your refund. Note that the purchase price used in this calculation excludes interest, finance charges, and insurance premiums, so a financed buyer does not get back the interest paid to the lender. The refund does include reimbursement of the lemon law complaint filing fee.
Updates
Corrected the buyback refund section, which wrongly listed finance charges as refundable when 43 Tex. Admin. Code 224.260(b)(1) excludes interest and finance charges and requires reimbursement of the filing fee; broadened the eligibility rules to match the full definition of owner in Occupations Code 2301.601(2), including Texas residents who registered a vehicle bought out of state; added the TxDMV warranty performance repair remedy available to used vehicles still under the manufacturer's original warranty; and named Section 2301.604 rather than 2301.605 as the section that creates the replacement-or-refund right.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Corrected the 'serious safety hazard' definition to the statute's actual two-prong test (control/operation impediment or fire/explosion risk, not a generic death-or-injury standard), and fixed the filing-deadline framing: the deadline is always 6 months after the earlier of warranty expiration or the 24-month/24,000-mile mark, not a standalone 24-month deadline competing with a separate 6-month rule.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Texas Occupations Code
§ 2301.604REPLACEMENT OF OR REFUND FOR VEHICLEIn force
(a) A manufacturer, converter, or distributor that is unable to conform a motor vehicle to an applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting a defect or condition that creates a serious safety hazard or substantially impairs the use or market value of the motor vehicle after a reasonable number of attempts shall reimburse the owner for reasonable incidental costs resulting from loss of use of the motor vehicle because of the nonconformity or defect and: (1) replace the motor vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle; or (2) accept return of the vehicle from the owner and refund to the owner the full purchase price, less a reasonable allowance for the owner's use of the vehicle, and any other allowances or refunds payable to the owner. (b) A refund made for a vehicle for which there is a lienholder shall be made to the owner and lienholder in proportion to each person's interest in the vehicle.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-16 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
§ 2301.605REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION--REASONABLE NUMBER OF ATTEMPTSIn force
(a) A rebuttable presumption that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to an applicable express warranty is established if: (1) the same nonconformity continues to exist after being subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer, converter, or distributor or an authorized agent or franchised dealer of a manufacturer, converter, or distributor and the attempts were made before the earlier of: (A) the date the express warranty expires; or (B) 24 months or 24,000 miles, whichever occurs first, following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the owner; (2) the same nonconformity creates a serious safety hazard and continues to exist after causing the vehicle to have been subject to repair two or more times by the manufacturer, converter, or distributor or an authorized agent or franchised dealer of a manufacturer, converter, or distributor and the attempts were made before the earlier of: (A) the date the express warranty expires; or (B) 24 months or 24,000 miles, whichever occurs first, following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the owner; or (3) a nonconformity still exists that…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2012
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2012)“…g the date of original delivery to the owner. Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 2301.605 (a)(3). Similarly, Dutchmen does not d…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2301.603CONFORMANCE WITH WARRANTY REQUIREDIn force
(a) A manufacturer, converter, or distributor shall make repairs necessary to conform a new motor vehicle to an applicable manufacturer's, converter's, or distributor's express warranty. (b) Subsection (a) applies after the expiration date of a warranty if: (1) during the term of the warranty, the owner or the owner's agent reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer, converter, or distributor, or to a designated agent or franchised dealer of the manufacturer, converter, or distributor; or (2) a rebuttable presumption relating to the vehicle is created under Section 2301.605. (c) This subchapter does not limit a remedy available to an owner under a new motor vehicle warranty that extends beyond the provisions of this subchapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 1 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2012
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2012)“…vehicle to the applicable manufacturer's warranty. (4) Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 2301.603 (West 2012). The statute also authori…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2301.601DEFINITIONSIn force
In this subchapter: (1) "Impairment of market value" means a substantial loss in market value caused by a defect specific to a motor vehicle. (2) "Owner" means a person who is entitled to enforce a manufacturer's warranty with respect to a motor vehicle, and who: (A) purchased the motor vehicle at retail from a license holder; (B) is a lessor or lessee, other than a sublessee, who purchased or leased the vehicle from a license holder; (C) is a resident of this state and has registered the vehicle in this state; (D) purchased or leased the vehicle at retail and is an active duty member of the United States armed forces stationed in this state at the time a proceeding is commenced under this subchapter; or (E) is: (i) the transferee or assignee of a person described by Paragraphs (A)-(D); (ii) a resident of this state; and (iii) the person who registered the vehicle in this state. (3) "Reasonable allowance for use" means the amount directly attributable to use of a motor vehicle when the vehicle is not out of service for repair.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Cited in 2 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2014
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2012)“…ions 2301.601-.613 of the occupations code.1 See generally Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 2301.601-.613 (West 2012) (commonly called the “…”
- Winnebago Industries, Inc. v. Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, Motor Vehicle Division (Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) 2014)“…ollowing a complaint pursuant to the Texas “Lemon Law.” See Tex. Occ. Code §§ 2301.601–.613 (“Lemon Law”), .751(a)(2) (provid…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2301.613NOTICE TO BUYERIn force
(a) The department shall prepare, publish, and distribute information concerning an owner's rights under this subchapter. The retail seller of a new motor vehicle shall conspicuously post a copy of the information in the area where its customers usually pay for repairs. (b) The failure to provide notice as required by this section is a violation of this chapter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
United States Code Title 15
§ 2310Remedies in consumer disputesIn forcecited in 12 of our articles
Congress hereby declares it to be its policy to encourage warrantors to establish procedures whereby consumer disputes are fairly and expeditiously settled through informal dispute settlement mechanisms. The Commission shall prescribe rules setting forth minimum requirements for any informal dispute settlement procedure which is incorporated into the terms of a written warranty to which any provision of this chapter applies. Such rules shall provide for participation in such procedure by independent or governmental entities. One or more warrantors may establish an informal dispute settlement procedure which meets the requirements of the Commission’s rules under paragraph (2).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-09-17 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,305 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange Litigation (Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1979, 594 F.2d 1106)“…to the court's discretion not to award attorneys' fees). 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (d)(2). Thus, the dismissal of the sub…”
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1986, 807 F.2d 1000)“…y rejected this contention, refusing to “read section 110 [ 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (1982) ] so broadly as to have it supe…”
- Terrance Golden v. Gorno Bros., Inc., D/B/A Gorno Ford (Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2005, 410 F.3d 879)“…y required under the statute's jurisdictional limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 2310 (d)(3)(B). 11…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Colorado Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, US Lemon Laws (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Nevada Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund
§ 2304Federal minimum standards for warrantiesIn force
In order for a warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty to meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty— such warrantor must as a minimum remedy such consumer product within a reasonable time and without charge, in the case of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty; notwithstanding section 2308(b) of this title, such warrantor may not impose any limitation on the duration of any implied warranty on the product; such warrantor may not exclude or limit consequential damages for breach of any written or implied warranty on such product, unless such exclusion or limitation conspicuously appears on the face of the warranty; and if the product (or a component part thereof) contains a defect or malfunction after a reasonable number of attempts by the warrantor to remedy defects or malfunctions in such product, such warrantor must permit the consumer to elect either a refund for, or replacement without charge of, such product or part (as the case may be).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 160 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- Bailey v. Monaco Coach Corp. (District Court, N.D. Georgia 2004, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1036)“…es are required to meet the minimum standards set forth in 15 U.S.C. § 2304 . See Razor v. Hyundai Motor Ame…”
- Jones v. Fleetwood Motor Homes (District Court, N.D. Illinois 2000, 127 F. Supp. 2d 958)“…table remedy of refund and rescission. Plaintiff relies on 15 U.S.C. § 2304 (a)(4), which provides in part: “if the…”
- Highway Sales, Inc. v. Blue Bird Corp. (Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 2009, 559 F.3d 782)“…vehicle prerequisite to a remedy." Id. at 80 (citing 15 U.S.C. § 2304 (a)(4)) (emphasis added). The parties a…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 2301DefinitionsIn forcecited in 41 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter: The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-28 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,671 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
In the courts (editorial summary, independently checked):Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (1986) held that except where Magnuson-Moss expressly prescribes a rule, the Act applies state written and implied warranty law, citing Section 2301(7)'s definition of implied warranty as one arising under state law. Birdsong v. Apple (2009) dismissed Act claims once the state warranty claims failed.
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1986, 807 F.2d 1000)✓Ford owners sought nationwide classes over transmissions that slipped from park into reverse; reading Section 2301(7) and (6), the D.C. Circuit held Magnuson-Moss applies state warranty law except where the Act expressly prescribes a rule, and vacated class certification.
- Birdsong v. Apple, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2009, 590 F.3d 955)✓iPod buyers alleged the player risked hearing loss; because Section 2301(7) ties implied warranty to state law, the Ninth Circuit treated the Magnuson-Moss claim as standing or falling with the California warranty claims and affirmed dismissal once those failed.
- Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004, 377 F.3d 1034)“…gnizable under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. This consumer dis…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Washington Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Florida Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, California Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Texas Occupations Code § 2301.001 (CONSTRUCTION; PURPOSE)
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Texas Occupations Code Chapter 2301 (Full Text)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Texas Department of Motor Vehicles: Lemon Law(txdmv.gov).gov
- Texas Attorney General: Consumer Protection(texasattorneygeneral.gov).gov
- Texas State Law Library: Warranty Law Guide(guides.sll.texas.gov).gov
- TxDMV Lemon Law Requirements (Chapter 11)(ftp.dot.state.tx.us).gov
- TxDMV Notice to Buyer: Texas Lemon Law(txdmv.gov).gov
- 15 U.S.C. 2310: Remedies in Consumer Disputes (Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act)(uscode.house.gov)
- 15 U.S.C. 2304: Federal Minimum Standards for Warranties(uscode.house.gov)
- 43 Tex. Admin. Code Section 224.260: Refund and Reasonable Allowance for Use(law.cornell.edu)