Last verified: February 2026
Key Points
- Primary Law: Nevada Motor Vehicle Warranty Law (NRS 597.600 to 597.700)
- Coverage: New motor vehicles within 2 years or 18,000 miles of original delivery
- Presumption: 4+ repair attempts for same defect OR 30+ calendar days out of service
- Remedies: Replacement vehicle or refund at consumer’s choice
- Arbitration: Manufacturer dispute settlement program or court action
- Attorney Fees: Prevailing consumers may recover attorney fees and costs
Quick Penalties Overview
| Violation Type | Consumer Remedy | Additional Damages |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to repair after reasonable attempts | Refund or replacement | Attorney fees and costs to prevailing consumer |
| Failure to disclose lemon buyback status | Rescission of sale | Title branding required; potential fraud claims |
| Deceptive trade practice | Actual damages | NRS 598 deceptive trade practice penalties |
Table of Contents
📑 Table of Contents (click to expand)
- Nevada’s Lemon Law Overview
- What Vehicles Are Covered
- Nevada’s Lemon Law Presumption
- Notice and Repair Requirements
- Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement
- Dispute Settlement Procedures
- Manufacturer Defenses
- Title Branding Requirements
- Electric Vehicle Considerations
- Statute of Limitations
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Resources and Legal Help
Nevada’s Lemon Law Overview
Nevada’s lemon law is codified in Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 597.600 through 597.700. This law provides important consumer protections for purchasers and lessees of new motor vehicles that cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts during the warranty period.
The Nevada Motor Vehicle Warranty Law establishes clear criteria for when a vehicle qualifies as a lemon, what remedies consumers are entitled to, and what procedures must be followed to obtain relief. The law covers a relatively broad range of vehicles, including passenger cars, trucks, motorcycles, and motor homes.
Nevada’s lemon law uses a standard 4 repair attempts or 30 days out of service threshold that is common among state lemon laws. The coverage period is 2 years or 18,000 miles, which provides a reasonable window for consumers to identify and document persistent defects.
One notable aspect of Nevada’s law is its treatment of motor homes. While many states exclude motor homes entirely, Nevada’s lemon law covers motor homes but applies only to the chassis and propulsion components, not the living quarters. This reflects the reality that motor home chassis are manufactured by different companies than the living quarters.
What Vehicles Are Covered
Nevada’s lemon law covers “motor vehicles” as defined in NRS 597.600. The definition is relatively broad but has important limitations.
Covered Vehicle Types
- Passenger cars: Sedans, coupes, hatchbacks, convertibles, and similar vehicles
- Trucks: Light-duty trucks and pickup trucks
- Motorcycles: Street-legal motorcycles with manufacturer warranties
- SUVs and crossovers: Sport utility vehicles and crossover vehicles
- Vans and minivans: Including passenger and cargo configurations
- Motor homes: Chassis and propulsion components only (not living quarters)
- Electric vehicles: Battery electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles
Vehicles Not Covered
- Motor home living quarters and appliances (only chassis/drivetrain covered)
- Vehicles purchased primarily for business purposes
- Off-road vehicles not designed for highway use
- Vehicles sold without a manufacturer’s express warranty
- Used vehicles (unless still within original manufacturer warranty period)
Consumer Definition
Under Nevada law, a “consumer” means a buyer or lessee of a motor vehicle for purposes other than resale, or any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the warranty period. This means that if you buy a relatively new used vehicle that is still under the original manufacturer’s warranty, you may still have lemon law rights.
Nevada’s Lemon Law Presumption
Under NRS 597.640, Nevada law creates a presumption that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made if certain conditions are met within the first 2 years of ownership or 18,000 miles, whichever occurs first.
The Lemon Law Presumption Applies When:
| Condition | Requirement | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Repair Attempts (Same Problem) | 4 or more attempts | Same nonconformity must substantially impair use and value |
| Days Out of Service | 30 or more calendar days | Cumulative total for repair of any covered defects |
| Timeframe | Within 2 years or 18,000 miles | Whichever comes first from date of original delivery |
When the presumption applies, the burden shifts to the manufacturer to prove either that the defect has been repaired, that the defect does not substantially impair the vehicle, or that the defect was caused by consumer abuse or unauthorized modifications.
What Qualifies as a Substantial Defect?
The defect must “substantially impair the use and value” of the motor vehicle to the consumer. Examples of qualifying defects include:
- Engine problems causing stalling, loss of power, or failure to start
- Transmission defects affecting drivability or shifting
- Brake system malfunctions or failures
- Steering problems creating safety hazards
- Electrical system failures affecting critical vehicle functions
- Air conditioning or heating system failures
- Persistent warning lights indicating serious mechanical issues
- Water leaks causing interior damage
- Excessive oil consumption requiring frequent top-offs
Minor cosmetic issues, rattles, or problems that do not affect safety, drivability, or significant value typically do not qualify.
Notice and Repair Requirements
Nevada’s lemon law requires consumers to follow certain procedures to preserve their rights under the statute.
Reporting the Defect
Under NRS 597.620, if a new motor vehicle does not conform to applicable express warranties, the consumer must report the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer during the term of the warranty. The manufacturer (or its agent or dealer) must then make necessary repairs to conform the vehicle to the warranties.
Final Repair Opportunity
Before being entitled to a refund or replacement, the consumer must provide the manufacturer with a final opportunity to cure the defect. The manufacturer must be given written notice of the need for repair and a reasonable opportunity to make the repair.
Documentation Requirements
Consumers should maintain detailed records of:
- All repair orders and invoices
- Dates the vehicle was brought in for repair
- Dates the vehicle was returned
- Written descriptions of the problems reported
- Correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Photos or videos of defects when possible
Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement
When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under Nevada law, the consumer has the right to choose between two remedies under NRS 597.630.
Option 1: Replacement Vehicle
The manufacturer must replace the motor vehicle with a comparable new motor vehicle acceptable to the consumer. The replacement vehicle should be of the same model and have similar equipment and options.
Option 2: Vehicle Buyback (Refund)
The manufacturer must accept return of the vehicle and refund to the consumer:
- Full purchase price: The total amount paid for the vehicle
- Collateral charges: Including sales tax, registration fees, license fees, and similar charges
- Finance charges: If applicable, interest and fees paid on vehicle financing
- Incidental damages: Reasonable expenses incurred as a result of the defect
Usage Deduction: The refund may be reduced by a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the vehicle prior to the first report of the nonconformity to the manufacturer or its agent. This is typically calculated as:
Usage Deduction = (Purchase Price × Miles Driven Before First Repair) / 120,000
Refunds to Lienholders
Refunds must be made to the consumer and lienholder, if any, as their interests appear. If there is an outstanding loan on the vehicle, the manufacturer will typically pay off the loan balance directly to the lender and refund any remaining amount to the consumer.
Dispute Settlement Procedures
Nevada’s lemon law provides for dispute settlement procedures to help resolve claims without litigation.
Manufacturer’s Dispute Settlement Program
Under NRS 597.650, if a manufacturer has established an informal dispute settlement procedure that complies with federal regulations (16 CFR Part 703), consumers may be required to use that procedure before pursuing remedies under the lemon law.
Requirements for Manufacturer Programs
To be valid, the manufacturer’s program must:
- Comply with federal requirements under 16 CFR Part 703
- Be reasonably accessible to consumers
- Provide decisions within a reasonable timeframe
- Not require the consumer to waive any statutory rights
Court Action
If the manufacturer does not have a qualifying dispute settlement program, or if the consumer is not satisfied with the outcome of such a program, the consumer may pursue remedies in court. Under NRS 597.680, a consumer who prevails in a lemon law action may recover reasonable attorney fees and costs.
Manufacturer Defenses
Manufacturers may raise several affirmative defenses to avoid lemon law liability under NRS 597.660.
Valid Affirmative Defenses
| Defense | Manufacturer’s Argument | Consumer’s Counter |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of substantial impairment | Defect does not substantially impair use and value | Document how defect affects daily use, safety, or resale value |
| Consumer abuse or neglect | Defect caused by consumer’s abuse or neglect of vehicle | Provide maintenance records showing proper care |
| Unauthorized modifications | Defect caused by modifications not authorized by manufacturer | Show defect existed before modifications or is unrelated |
| Defect repaired | The nonconformity has been cured | Document continued problems after claimed repair |
The burden of proving these defenses rests with the manufacturer. Consumers should maintain thorough documentation to counter any claims that they caused the defect or that it has been successfully repaired.
Title Branding Requirements
Nevada has requirements for disclosing vehicles that have been returned under the lemon law to protect subsequent purchasers.
Lemon Law Buyback Disclosure
When a vehicle is returned to a manufacturer under the lemon law (whether by settlement, arbitration, or court order), the manufacturer must:
- Notify the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
- Ensure the title is branded to indicate lemon law buyback status
- Disclose the vehicle’s history to any subsequent purchaser
Purchasing a Previously Returned Vehicle
If you are considering purchasing a used vehicle, you should:
- Check the title for any lemon law branding
- Request a vehicle history report
- Ask the seller directly about any lemon law history
- Have the vehicle inspected by an independent mechanic
Failure to disclose lemon law buyback status may constitute fraud and give the buyer grounds to rescind the sale.
Electric Vehicle Considerations
Electric vehicles are covered under Nevada’s lemon law. Given Nevada’s growing EV market and the presence of major EV manufacturers in the state, understanding how the lemon law applies to EVs is increasingly important.
Common EV Defects That May Qualify
- Battery degradation significantly beyond normal parameters
- Charging system failures (onboard charger, charge port problems)
- Range substantially below manufacturer specifications
- Electric motor or drivetrain malfunctions
- Thermal management system failures
- Software glitches affecting vehicle operation or safety
- Regenerative braking system problems
- Display or control system failures affecting critical functions
EV-Specific Challenges
- Software updates: Manufacturers may argue over-the-air updates resolved issues
- Battery warranty: EVs often have separate battery warranties that may complicate analysis
- Limited dealer expertise: Some dealers may lack specialized EV training
- Documentation: Software and electrical issues may require specialized diagnostic records
Statute of Limitations
Understanding the time limits for filing a Nevada lemon law claim is essential for protecting your rights.
Key Time Periods
- Coverage period: 2 years or 18,000 miles from original delivery, whichever is earlier
- Warranty period extension: Time periods may be extended if repairs were unavailable due to war, strike, or natural disaster
- Court action: Must be filed within the applicable statute of limitations for contract or warranty claims
Preserving Your Rights
To protect your lemon law rights in Nevada:
- Report all defects promptly and in writing during the warranty period
- Keep detailed records of all repair attempts and dates
- Follow any manufacturer dispute settlement procedures if required
- Consult with an attorney if your claim is not resolved informally
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts does Nevada require before a vehicle is considered a lemon?
Nevada law presumes a vehicle is a lemon after four or more repair attempts for the same substantial defect, or after the vehicle has been out of service for 30 or more cumulative calendar days for repairs. These conditions must occur within 2 years of delivery or 18,000 miles, whichever comes first.
Does Nevada’s lemon law cover motorcycles?
Yes, motorcycles are covered under Nevada’s lemon law. The same criteria apply: four repair attempts or 30 days out of service within the warranty period for a defect that substantially impairs use and value.
Are motor homes covered under Nevada’s lemon law?
Motor homes are partially covered. Nevada’s lemon law applies to the motor home’s chassis and propulsion components (engine, transmission, drivetrain) but not to the living quarters, appliances, or fixtures. This is because these components are typically manufactured by different companies.
Can I recover attorney fees if I win my Nevada lemon law case?
Yes. Under NRS 597.680, a consumer who prevails in a lemon law action may recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. This makes it easier to find attorneys willing to take lemon law cases, as their fees will be paid by the manufacturer if the case is successful.
Do I have to use the manufacturer’s arbitration program first?
If the manufacturer has an informal dispute settlement procedure that complies with federal regulations (16 CFR Part 703), you may be required to use it before pursuing lemon law remedies. However, if the program does not comply with federal requirements, or if no such program exists, you can proceed directly to seeking legal remedies.
What is the usage deduction in Nevada?
The manufacturer may deduct a reasonable allowance for your use of the vehicle before the first repair attempt for the defect. This is typically calculated by multiplying the purchase price by the miles driven, then dividing by 120,000. For example, if you paid $40,000 and drove 6,000 miles before the first repair, the deduction would be approximately $2,000.
Resources and Legal Help
Official Resources
- Nevada Lemon Law Statute (NRS 597.600-597.700)
- Nevada Attorney General’s Office
- Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles
- Nevada Consumer Affairs