South Dakota Sexting Laws (2026 Guide)

South Dakota distinguishes between minors who share explicit images and adults who commit serious child pornography offenses. Under SDCL § 26-10-33, known as the “juvenile sexting” statute, minors face misdemeanor charges for sexting offenses rather than the severe felony penalties associated with child pornography. However, adults—and minors in serious cases—can still face prosecution under the state’s strict child pornography laws.

This comprehensive guide explores the legal landscape of sexting in South Dakota, covering criminal penalties, available defenses for teenagers, the distinction between juvenile mistakes and serious crimes, and the long-term consequences of a conviction.

Table of Contents

• South Dakota Teen Sexting Law (§ 26-10-33)
• Penalties for Teen Sexting
• Defenses to Juvenile Sexting
• Child Pornography Laws (§ 22-24A)
• Federal Sexting Laws
• Adults Sexting With Minors
• Revenge Porn and Privacy Laws
• The Juvenile Court Process
• School Consequences
• Parental Liability
• Civil Liability
• Long-Term Impact
• Frequently Asked Questions
• What to Do If Charged
• Resources

South Dakota Teen Sexting Law (§ 26-10-33)

South Dakota enacted specific legislation to handle cases of minors sending explicit images to other minors. Found in SDCL 26-10-33, this law prohibits “juvenile sexting.” Before this law was passed, any minor involved in sexting could technically be charged with the production, possession, or distribution of child pornography—a felony offense carrying mandatory sex offender registration.

The statute makes it illegal for a minor (person under 18) to intentionally:

• Create, produce, distribute, present, transmit, post, exchange, or disseminate any visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct or in a state of nudity.
• Possess such material on a computer, phone, or digital device.

This law was designed to prevent teenagers from being labeled as sex offenders or felons for what is often considered impulsive adolescent behavior, providing a “step down” from the state’s harsh child pornography statutes. It acknowledges that while the behavior is illegal and harmful, it does not always warrant the life-altering stigma of a felony record.

What Counts as “Prohibited Sexual Act”?

The definition of prohibited content is broad. Under SDCL 22-24A-2, prohibited sexual acts include:

• Sexual intercourse (actual or simulated)
• Masturbation
• Sado-masochistic abuse
• Lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area

This means that even a “nude selfie” (displaying genitals or female breasts) can trigger these laws if it meets the definition of sexually explicit conduct or nudity under the statute. The law does not require the image to be “pornographic” in a commercial sense; a simple bathroom mirror selfie sent to a boyfriend or girlfriend falls under this definition.

Penalties for Teen Sexting

The primary benefit of the juvenile sexting statute is that it categorizes the offense as a misdemeanor rather than a felony. While the specific class can depend on the circumstances and judicial discretion, South Dakota misdemeanors carry the following maximum penalties:

Typically, juvenile sexting is treated as a Class 1 misdemeanor if there is distribution involved, though possession alone might be treated less severely. However, in the juvenile justice system, the focus is distinct from adult court.

Diversion and Rehabilitation

In many juvenile cases, courts prefer diversion programs over standard sentencing. A judge or juvenile probation officer might order:

• Counseling: Mandatory therapy to address decision-making and digital safety.
• Community Service: Hours spent working for a non-profit or community organization.
• Educational Programs: Classes specifically designed to teach teens about the dangers of sexting and digital footprints.
• Probation: A period of supervision where the minor must follow strict rules (curfew, device monitoring) to avoid further penalties.

If a minor successfully completes a diversion program, the charges might be dismissed, keeping their record clean. This is the ideal outcome for a first-time offense involving consensual peer-to-peer sexting.

Defenses to Juvenile Sexting

South Dakota law provides specific affirmative defenses under SDCL 26-10-34. These defenses are crucial for protecting minors who are experimenting with relationships rather than acting with predatory intent.

Consensual Dating Relationship (“Romeo and Juliet”)

A common defense applies if the minors involved were in a consensual dating relationship. To use this defense effectively, a lawyer typically demonstrates that:

• The minors involved were close in age (typically within a few years, such as a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old).
• The relationship was voluntary and consensual.
• The image was created and shared solely within that relationship.
• There was no coercion, payment, or threat involved.

Unsolicited Receipt

A major concern for teens is “airdropping” or receiving unwanted images. If a minor receives an explicit image they did not ask for, they may have a defense if they:

• Did not solicit or request the image.
• Did not redistribute or share the image with anyone else.
• Promptly deleted or reported the image.

Crucial Warning: If a teen receives an unsolicited image and then forwards it to a friend with a caption like “Gross, look at this,” they lose this defense. Redistribution is a separate act that can lead to charges.

Note: These defenses generally do not apply if the material was shared with the intent to harass, intimidate, or bully the victim, or if the images were distributed widely to humiliate the subject.

Child Pornography Laws (§ 22-24A)

When the juvenile sexting statute does not apply—such as in cases involving adults, coercion, commercial gain, or widespread malicious distribution—prosecutors utilize South Dakota’s strict child pornography laws found in Chapter 22-24A.

Possession of Child Pornography

Under SDCL 22-24A-3, knowingly possessing visual depictions of a minor engaging in prohibited sexual acts is a Class 4 Felony.

• Penalty: Up to 10 years in state prison and a fine of up to $20,000.
• Sex Offender Registration: A conviction typically requires mandatory registration as a sex offender, often for life.

Distribution or Manufacture

Manufacturing, distributing, or selling such material is a more serious offense. This includes taking the photo (manufacture) or hitting “send” (distribution).

• Class 3 Felony: Up to 15 years in prison and a $30,000 fine.
• Class 2 Felony: Up to 25 years in prison and a $50,000 fine.

Aggravating Factors

Penalties can be enhanced if:

• The victim is under a certain age (e.g., under 13).
• The offender is an adult in a position of authority.
• The material involves violence or sado-masochistic abuse.

Federal Sexting Laws

While state laws handle most local sexting cases, federal law can apply, especially if images are sent across state lines (interstate commerce). Federal child pornography laws are extremely severe.

18 U.S. Code § 2252A

Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, receipt, or possession of child pornography. Penalties are harsh:

• Distribution/Receipt: Mandatory minimum of 5 years in federal prison, up to 20 years.
• Possession: Up to 10 years in federal prison (or up to 20 years with prior convictions).

Federal prosecutors typically do not get involved in minor-to-minor sexting cases unless they are part of a larger investigation or involve particularly egregious conduct. However, the possibility exists, making the legal stakes incredibly high.

Adults Sexting With Minors

Adults (18+) who exchange explicit images with minors cannot use the “juvenile sexting” defenses available to teenagers. The law views this as predatory behavior, regardless of the minor’s willingness.

• Solicitation of a Minor: Using the internet, apps, or text messages to solicit a minor for sexual activity is a felony offense.
• Contributing to Delinquency: Can be charged as a Class 1 misdemeanor for encouraging a minor to engage in illegal acts (like producing pornography).
• Child Pornography: As noted above, receiving an image from a minor constitutes possession of child pornography, a Class 4 Felony. Creating the image (even by directing the minor to take it) counts as production/manufacture.

Strict Liability: South Dakota law generally applies “strict liability” regarding the age of the victim in these cases. Claiming “I didn’t know she was 16” is rarely a valid defense if the victim was in fact a minor. A minor cannot legally consent to the creation or distribution of pornography.

Revenge Porn and Privacy Laws

Revenge porn—the non-consensual distribution of intimate images that were originally taken with consent—is a growing legal issue. Unlike some states with specific “revenge porn” statutes criminalizing the distribution of consensually taken images, South Dakota’s laws primarily focus on invasion of privacy and recording without consent.

Invasion of Privacy (§ 22-21-4)

Under SDCL 22-21-4, it is a Class 1 misdemeanor to:

• Use a recording device to view or record a person in a private place (like a bathroom, tanning booth, or bedroom) without their consent.
• This addresses “video voyeurism” or hidden camera cases.

If the images were taken with consent but shared without consent (classic revenge porn), the legal path is murkier. Prosecutors may attempt to use:

• Harassment Laws: If the sharing is intended to harass, annoy, or alarm the victim (SDCL 22-19A). Stalking laws may also apply if there is a pattern of conduct.
• Disorderly Conduct: In some cases, public dissemination could be argued as disorderly conduct, though this is a stretch.

Future Legislation: AI and Deepfakes

As of 2026, the South Dakota legislature is actively debating more specific criminal statutes to address “nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images.” This includes addressing AI-generated “deepfake” pornography, where a person’s face is superimposed onto explicit material. Until specific laws are passed, victims often have to rely on civil remedies.

The Juvenile Court Process

Understanding how the juvenile justice system works in South Dakota can help demystify the process for parents and teens facing charges.

1. Investigation and Petition

Police investigate the report. If they find evidence of a crime, they forward the case to the State’s Attorney. The prosecutor then decides whether to file a “petition” alleging the child is a “delinquent child” or a “child in need of supervision” (CHINS).

2. Intake and Detention Hearing

A court services officer assesses the child. If the child is detained (arrested), a hearing must be held within 48 hours to determine if they should be released to parents or kept in juvenile detention.

3. Adjudicatory Hearing

This is the juvenile equivalent of a trial. The judge hears evidence and determines if the allegations in the petition are true. There are no juries in juvenile court.

4. Dispositional Hearing

If the judge finds the child delinquent, a dispositional hearing is held to decide the penalty (sentencing). This is where diversion, probation, or counseling is ordered. The judge considers the child’s age, history, and the severity of the offense.

5. Sealing Records

Juvenile records are generally confidential. However, they are not automatically destroyed. A petition to seal or expunge records may be necessary after the child turns 18 and completes their sentence.

School Consequences

Sexting incidents often occur between classmates or on school grounds, leading to school disciplinary actions that run parallel to legal proceedings.

• Suspension or Expulsion: Schools have “zero tolerance” policies for sexual harassment or disruption. Sharing explicit images often qualifies as both.
• Extracurricular Ban: Student codes of conduct for athletes and club members usually prohibit illegal or “unbecoming” conduct. A sexting charge can result in removal from sports teams, band, or student government.
• Mandatory Reporting: School administrators, teachers, and counselors are mandatory reporters. If they see or hear about explicit images of a minor, they are legally required to report it to law enforcement or Child Protective Services. They cannot just “handle it internally.”

Parental Liability

Can parents be held responsible for their child’s sexting? Generally, parents are not criminally liable for their child’s actions unless they contributed to them (e.g., encouraged the behavior). However, civil liability is a different matter.

Civil Lawsuits: Parents can be sued in civil court for the actions of their minor children. If a teen distributes revenge porn that causes significant emotional distress or reputational damage to a victim, the victim’s family could sue the offender’s parents for damages (money).

Negligent Supervision: If parents knew their child had a history of such behavior and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it (like monitoring phone use), they could theoretically be liable for negligent supervision.

Civil Liability

Beyond criminal charges, sexting can lead to lawsuits. Victims of non-consensual pornography (revenge porn) or invasion of privacy can sue for:

• Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): Proving the conduct was extreme and outrageous and caused severe emotional suffering.
• Invasion of Privacy: Public disclosure of private facts.
• Defamation: If false statements accompanied the images.

Civil judgments can result in significant financial penalties, requiring the offender (or their parents) to pay for the victim’s therapy, reputational damage, and pain and suffering.

Long-Term Impact

Even a misdemeanor conviction for sexting can have lasting consequences that extend far beyond the courtroom:

• Criminal Record: A conviction stays on your record. While juvenile records are sealed, they can sometimes be accessed by law enforcement or military recruiters.
• College Admissions: Many colleges ask about criminal history or school disciplinary records. A suspension for “sexual misconduct” looks very bad on an application.
• Employment: Background checks are standard for many jobs. A record involving “sexual exploitation” or “indecent exposure” can bar employment in education, healthcare, childcare, and government sectors.
• Digital Footprint: Images shared online are nearly impossible to completely remove. They can resurface years later, affecting career prospects and personal relationships.
• Social Stigma: Being labeled “the kid who sent that photo” can lead to bullying, isolation, and mental health struggles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is sexting a felony in South Dakota?

For minors charged under the specific juvenile sexting statute (§ 26-10-33), it is a Class 1 or Class 2 misdemeanor. However, for adults, or for minors in aggravated cases (like coercion), it can be charged as felony child pornography (Class 4 Felony or higher), which is much more serious.

Can I be charged if I only received the photo?

Technically, possession is a crime. However, the law generally provides a defense for minors who receive unsolicited images and do not redistribute them. If you keep it, show it to others, or save it to a hidden folder, you risk prosecution. The best action is to delete it immediately.

Does South Dakota have a “Romeo and Juliet” law for sexting?

Yes, SDCL 26-10-34 provides defenses for minors in consensual dating relationships. This typically applies when the age difference is small (e.g., less than 3-4 years) and the images are not disseminated to third parties. It allows courts to treat these cases as relationship mistakes rather than sex crimes.

Do I have to register as a sex offender?

Convictions under the specific juvenile sexting statute (§ 26-10-33) generally do not require sex offender registration. This is one of the main reasons the law was passed. However, a conviction for felony child pornography (§ 22-24A) mandates registration, often for life.

What if the image is a “deepfake” or AI-generated?

South Dakota law is evolving. While traditional statutes focus on depictions of “real” children, prosecutors may argue that AI-generated images of specific minors constitute harassment or satisfy the definition of prohibited visual depictions. Legislation specifically targeting AI porn is a priority for lawmakers in the 2025-2026 sessions.

Can school take my phone?

Yes, if school officials have “reasonable suspicion” that your phone contains evidence of a violation of school rules or the law, they can search it. In many cases, they will then turn the phone over to police, who can perform a more forensic search.

How long do I have to wait to expunge my record?

If you are adjudicated as a juvenile delinquent, you generally have to wait until you are at least 18 (or 21 in some cases) and have had no further offenses for a set period. You should consult an attorney to file the necessary petition for expungement.

What to Do If Charged

If you or your child faces sexting allegations, taking the right steps immediately is crucial:

Do:

• Consult an Attorney: Contact a criminal defense lawyer specializing in juvenile law immediately. Do not try to handle this alone.
• Preserve Evidence: Keep texts, logs, or screenshots that show the context (dating relationship, unsolicited nature, lack of distribution). Hand these over to your lawyer, not the police.
• Stay Silent: Do not discuss the incident with police, school officials, or friends without a lawyer present. Anything you say can be used against you.
• Cooperate with Counsel: Be honest with your lawyer about exactly what happened, who saw the images, and where they might be stored.

Do Not:

• Delete Evidence of Innocence: While you shouldn’t keep the explicit image, don’t delete text threads that prove you didn’t ask for it or that it was sent within a relationship.
• Share the Image: Never forward the image to anyone, even to “show what happened” or to ask for advice. Forwarding counts as distribution.
• Talk to Peers: Discussing the case with friends can create more witnesses against you. Rumors spread fast and can distort the truth.
• Panic: While serious, these cases are often resolved through diversion programs if handled correctly.

Resources

Legal & Support

• South Dakota Unified Judicial System – Information on courts and processes.
• South Dakota Department of Social Services – Resources for families and child protection.
• Cyber Civil Rights Initiative – Help and legal guides for victims of non-consensual pornography.

Safety & Education

• National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) – Reporting and resources.
• Thorn: Digital Safety for Kids – Tools for parents to protect children online.
• Common Sense Media – Guides for parents on digital citizenship and safety.

---

This article provides general legal information about South Dakota sexting laws as of February 2026. Laws are subject to change. This information is not legal advice. If you need legal assistance, please consult a qualified South Dakota attorney.