California Sexting Laws (2026 Guide)


California stands apart from many other states by not having a specific “teen sexting” statute. Instead, the state relies on general child pornography laws to prosecute sexting cases involving minors. This legal framework means that a teenager sending a nude selfie to a partner is technically committing the same statutory offense as an adult trafficking in child pornography. Under California Penal Code § 311.11, the possession of such images is a “wobbler” offense that can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony.

The consequences for these offenses are severe, ranging from juvenile detention and school expulsion to long-term sex offender registration. For adults, the penalties for sexting with a minor or engaging in “revenge porn” are even stricter, often involving mandatory prison time and lifetime registration. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the current legal landscape in California as of 2026.

Key Legal Facts

  • Specific Teen Sexting Law: No (prosecuted under general child porn laws)
  • Primary Statute: Penal Code § 311.11 (Possession)
  • Revenge Porn Statute: Penal Code § 647(j)(4)
  • Sex Offender Registration: Generally required (Tiered system)
  • Civil Liability: Parents can be liable for damages
  • School Discipline: Suspension or expulsion likely (Ed. Code § 48900.2)

Penalties at a Glance

  • Possession (Misdemeanor): Up to 1 year jail, $2,500 fine
  • Possession (Felony): 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years prison
  • Distribution (Felony): 2, 4, or 6 years prison
  • Revenge Porn (1st Offense): Up to 6 months jail, $1,000 fine
  • Civil Liability Cap: ~$50,000+ (inflation adjusted)

Table of Contents

The Lack of a Teen Sexting Statute

Unlike states such as Texas, Florida, or Colorado, California has not enacted a specific “Romeo and Juliet” statute to address consensual sexting between minors. In those other jurisdictions, specific laws often downgrade teen-to-teen sexting to a non-sexual misdemeanor or a civil infraction to avoid labeling teenagers as sex offenders. California lacks this legislative nuance.

Legally, a 17-year-old in California who possesses a nude photo of their 16-year-old girlfriend is violating Penal Code § 311.11—the same law used to prosecute predators who possess collections of child abuse material. There is no statutory exception based on the age of the possessor or the consensual nature of the relationship.

However, the application of the law often differs from the strict text. California’s juvenile justice system operates with a mandate for rehabilitation. Prosecutors, probation officers, and judges typically exercise significant discretion in these cases. It is common for first-time teen offenders to be diverted from the formal court system, but this is a matter of practice, not a guarantee written into the penal code. Families should not assume leniency is automatic; the potential for a sex offender registration requirement remains a legal reality until a case is resolved.

Possession of Child Pornography (§ 311.11)

The most frequent charge in sexting cases is the possession of matter depicting a minor engaging in sexual conduct. This is governed by Penal Code § 311.11.

What Constitutes “Sexual Conduct”?

The definition of “sexual conduct” in California is broad. Under Penal Code § 311(a), it includes:

  • Sexual intercourse (actual or simulated)
  • Masturbation
  • Sexual arousal or gratification
  • Lewd exhibition of the genitals or anus

Critically, a “lewd exhibition” does not necessarily require a sexual act. A simple nude selfie taken in a bathroom mirror can meet this definition if it focuses on the genitals or breasts (of a female) for the purpose of sexual arousal. The law applies to any “matter,” which includes digital images stored on phones, cloud accounts, or hard drives.

Constructive Possession

You do not need to be holding the phone to “possess” the images. If you have the password to a cloud account where images are stored, or if you control the device they are on, you can be charged with constructive possession.

Distribution and Production Laws (§ 311.1, § 311.2)

Charges escalate significantly when images are shared, forwarded, or produced.

Distribution (§ 311.2)

Under Penal Code § 311.2, it is a crime to distribute, send, or exhibit explicit material depicting a minor. This is a felony offense. In the context of sexting, “distribution” can be interpreted broadly:

  • Forwarding a photo to a friend
  • Posting a photo in a group chat
  • Showing a photo on your phone screen to another person (“exhibiting”)
  • Uploading a photo to a website or social media platform

Production and Solicitation (§ 311.1)

Soliciting a minor to send a nude photo can be charged as production or procurement under Penal Code § 311.1. If a teen asks their partner, “Send me a pic,” and the partner complies, the requester has technically “procured” the creation of child pornography. This statute carries mandatory prison time in many scenarios.

Revenge Porn Laws (§ 647(j)(4))

California has been a leader in addressing non-consensual pornography, often called “revenge porn.” This law applies to both minors and adults.

Under Penal Code § 647(j)(4), a person is guilty of disorderly conduct (a misdemeanor) if they:

  1. Intentionally distribute an image of the intimate body parts of another person.
  2. Do so with the specific intent to cause serious emotional distress.
  3. The depicted person suffers serious emotional distress.
  4. The distributor knew or should have known that the depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

This statute is vital because it covers images that were originally taken consensually. If a couple exchanges photos while dating, but one party shares them publicly after a breakup to humiliate the other, this law applies. The “intent to cause distress” element is key; merely sharing an image without specific malicious intent might not violate this statute, though it could still violate distribution laws if the subject is a minor.

Deepfakes and AI-Generated Content

California has updated its laws to address the growing issue of “deepfake” pornography—realistic images or videos created by artificial intelligence. Under Civil Code § 1708.86 (enacted by AB 602), victims have a private right of action to sue anyone who creates or discloses sexually explicit material where the depicted person did not consent. This applies even if the image is entirely fake but uses the victim’s likeness.

Furthermore, recent legislation has clarified that creating AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is prosecutable under existing child pornography statutes if the image is indistinguishable from a real child, or if a real child’s likeness is used to create the material. This closes a loophole where offenders might claim an image was “virtual” to avoid prosecution.

School Disciplinary Consequences

Beyond the criminal justice system, students face immediate and severe consequences at school. California Education Code grants school administrators broad authority to discipline students for off-campus conduct that affects the school environment.

Suspension and Expulsion

Under Education Code § 48900.2, a student may be suspended or recommended for expulsion for committing “sexual harassment.” This is defined as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, or other conduct of a sexual nature that has a negative impact on the victim’s academic performance or creates a hostile learning environment.

Furthermore, Education Code § 48900(r) allows for discipline for bullying, including cyberbullying. Sexting incidents often spill over onto school grounds, causing rumors, fights, or disruptions. Once a nexus to the school is established, administrators can:

  • Suspend the student for up to 5 days per incident.
  • Refer the student to an expulsion hearing.
  • Transfer the student to a continuation school.
  • Note the disciplinary action on the student’s permanent record.

Civil Liability for Parents

Parents in California can be held financially responsible for their child’s misconduct. Under Civil Code § 1714.1, any act of “willful misconduct” by a minor that results in injury or death to another person, or injury to property, imputes liability to the parent or guardian.

The statutory limit for this liability was originally set at $25,000 but is adjusted every two years by the Judicial Council to reflect the cost of living. As of 2026, this limit exceeds $50,000. This means that if a teen distributes revenge porn that causes a victim need for therapy, medical treatment, or results in reputational damage, the parents could be sued for damages up to this limit, plus potentially unlimited legal fees.

Penalties and Sentencing Details

The penalties for sexting offenses in California depend heavily on whether the charge is filed as a misdemeanor or a felony.

Possession (§ 311.11) – The “Wobbler”

PC 311.11 is a “wobbler” offense. This gives the prosecutor discretion to file charges as either a misdemeanor or a felony based on the facts of the case and the defendant’s history.

  • Misdemeanor: Up to one year in county jail and a fine of up to $2,500.
  • Felony: Imprisonment in county jail for 16 months, 2 years, or 3 years (under Realignment) and a fine of up to $10,000.

Defense attorneys often file “17(b) motions” (named after Penal Code § 17(b)) to ask the judge to reduce a felony wobbler to a misdemeanor, which preserves the defendant’s civil rights (like the right to own a firearm) and reduces the stigma of a felony conviction.

Distribution (§ 311.2)

Distribution is a straight felony. It is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years. Probation is possible, but a prison sentence is the statutory baseline.

Revenge Porn (§ 647(j)(4))

As a misdemeanor, the penalties are strictly defined:

  • First Offense: Up to 6 months in county jail and a fine of up to $1,000.
  • Second or Subsequent Offense: Up to 1 year in county jail and a fine of up to $2,000.

Sex Offender Registration (Tiered System)

Perhaps the most terrifying consequence of a sexting conviction is the requirement to register as a sex offender under Penal Code § 290. Historically, this was a lifetime requirement for all offenses. However, California implemented a tiered system starting in 2021.

The Tiered System (SB 384)

  • Tier 1 (10 Years): Generally for misdemeanors and less serious non-violent felonies.
  • Tier 2 (20 Years): For more serious felonies or those with prior offenses.
  • Tier 3 (Lifetime): For violent sex crimes or high-risk repeat offenders.

A felony conviction for possession (§ 311.11) or distribution (§ 311.2) typically triggers mandatory registration. If a teen is adjudicated in juvenile court, the judge has discretion regarding registration. In many juvenile cases, registration is NOT ordered, or the records are sealed upon successful completion of probation, effectively removing the registration requirement.

Legal Defenses

Fighting sexting charges requires a strategic approach tailored to the specific facts. Common defenses include:

Lack of Knowledge

Possession crimes require “knowledge.” If a photo was AirDropped to your phone without your consent, or automatically downloaded by a messaging app like WhatsApp to your gallery without you viewing it, you may lack the necessary criminal intent. Prompt deletion is key evidence here.

No Intent to Distribute

For distribution charges, proving intent is crucial. If a cloud backup service automatically synced a photo to a shared family album, this might be argued as accidental distribution rather than criminal intent to distribute.

Private/Consensual Nature (Mitigation)

While not a statutory defense, the “Romeo and Juliet” scenario is a powerful mitigation argument. Defense attorneys present evidence of the relationship’s consensual nature, the proximity in age, and the lack of predatory behavior to persuade prosecutors to drop charges or offer diversion.

Revenge Porn Defenses

For § 647(j)(4), common defenses include:

  • Consent: The victim agreed to the distribution at the time (even if they regret it later).
  • Public View: The image was taken in a public place where there was no reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., a nude beach), though this is fact-specific.

The Juvenile Justice Process

Most teen sexting cases in California are handled in juvenile court, which operates differently from adult criminal court.

Step 1: Intake and Assessment

When a police report is filed, it goes to the county probation department. A probation officer assesses the minor’s risk level and needs.

Step 2: Diversion (Informal Probation)

Under Welfare and Institutions Code § 654, the probation department can divert the case before a petition is even filed. The minor agrees to a program of supervision (usually 6 months) involving counseling, community service, and education. If successful, no charges are filed.

Step 3: Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ)

Under Welfare and Institutions Code § 790, a minor charged with a felony may be eligible for DEJ. The minor admits to the offense, but the entry of judgment is deferred. If the minor completes probation (typically 12-36 months) and stays out of trouble, the charges are dismissed, and the arrest record is sealed.

This path is the “gold standard” for defense attorneys representing teens in sexting cases, as it avoids a permanent criminal record and sex offender registration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it a crime to have a nude photo of myself if I am a minor?

Technically, the law criminalizes the possession of matter depicting a minor in sexual conduct. However, purely self-possession (a selfie on your own phone) is almost never prosecuted. The danger arises when that photo is sent to someone else, who then possesses it illegally.

What should I do if my child finds a nude photo on their phone?

Do not forward it to anyone, not even to yourself or the police, as that constitutes distribution. Take the phone to the police station physically if you wish to report it. If you want to dispose of it, delete it immediately and permanently (including from “Recently Deleted” folders and cloud backups).

Can schools search my child’s phone?

School officials need “reasonable suspicion” to search a student’s phone. This is a lower standard than the “probable cause” required for police. If a teacher sees a student showing a nude photo to another student, that likely creates reasonable suspicion to search the device for that specific image.

Does a sexting conviction ruin college chances?

It can. While juvenile records are confidential, some colleges ask about disciplinary history or criminal adjudications. Furthermore, if the case is not sealed, a background check could reveal the arrest. However, successful diversion and sealing of records allows a student to legally answer “no” to questions about criminal history.

What about federal laws?

Federal child pornography laws (18 U.S.C. § 2252) are extremely severe, with mandatory minimum prison sentences. Federal prosecution is rare for local teen sexting cases but is possible if the images cross state lines (internet transmission always crosses state lines) and the conduct is egregious or predatory.

Resources

Legal Assistance

Support & Education

This article provides general legal information about California sexting laws as of February 2026. Laws are subject to change, and this information does not constitute legal advice. If you are facing legal issues, please consult with a qualified California criminal defense attorney.