Domestic Violence Laws in Canada
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 4, 2026). · 31 primary sources cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Canada has no standalone domestic violence offence under the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46; instead, prosecutors charge domestic abuse as assault, uttering threats under section 264.1, or criminal harassment under section 264. Provincial protection orders and federal peace bonds under section 810 provide additional remedies for victims.
Under Canadian law, persons accused of domestic violence may face prosecution under the Canadian Criminal Code for acts of violence or abuse. In addition, under provincial laws, disobeying protection orders or applying for a protection order under pretense may lead to criminal charges.
Below is everything victims and persons accused of domestic violence in Canada need to know.
Call 911 if you or someone you know is in immediate danger.
Crisis lines, shelter referrals and victim services are run provincially rather than federally, so the number to call depends on where you live. Your provincial or territorial government's family violence page lists the current lines, and Alberta's are set out on Alberta's domestic violence laws page.
Watch out: if the person harming you can get into your phone, your accounts, or your browser history, a call or a saved page can be seen. Many provincial family violence services offer text and online chat as well as phone. If you think you are being monitored, consider reaching out from a device the other person cannot check.
Quick take: Canada's domestic violence laws explained
For victims of domestic violence
- You have the right to protect yourself from domestic violence using reasonable and necessary force under section 34 of the Criminal Code.
- In a criminal prosecution, the Crown, not the victim, must prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt; you do not have to prove your case yourself before reporting to police.
- Your role in the incident is one of the factors a court weighs when deciding whether force used in self-defence was reasonable, under section 34(2)(c).
- You may apply for provincial protection orders or a federal peace bond.
For persons accused of domestic violence
- Upon arrest, let your lawyer speak for you and do not say more than is necessary.
- Police are not obliged to tell you everything they know, and anything you say can be used against you. Say nothing beyond identifying yourself until you have spoken with a lawyer.
- You have the right to protect yourself, others and property from violence or damage.
- Breaching a peace bond is a separate offence under section 811 of the Criminal Code and carries up to 4 years in prison.
- Evidence, witnesses or an alibi can raise a reasonable doubt, but the Crown carries the burden of proving the charge.
- Sentences run higher where the offence involved abuse of an intimate partner or a family member, or abuse of a person under 18, both of which section 718.2(a) of the Criminal Code names as aggravating factors.
- A conviction can cost you your firearms for at least a decade, and in some cases for life, under sections 109 and 110 of the Criminal Code.
References:
- Canadian Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46
- Department of Justice Canada: family law resources, including family violence materials
What constitutes domestic violence in Canada?
The Canadian Criminal Code does not contain legislation specific to domestic abuse or violence. However, an act of violence in the home may consequently result in criminal charges under the Criminal Code. What counts as domestic violence for provincial protection-order purposes depends on your province's family violence legislation. Alberta has its own provincial framework; see Alberta's domestic violence laws for that province's Protection Against Family Violence Act, Clare's Law application process, and penalty details. If your province isn't covered yet, contact a local victim services agency or legal aid clinic for help.
There is no offence called domestic violence to be found guilty of. Conduct in a domestic setting that intentionally or recklessly causes injury, death or property damage is charged under the general Criminal Code offences set out below, and the domestic relationship then operates as an aggravating factor at sentencing under section 718.2(a)(ii).
What are the 5 main types of domestic violence in Canada?
Under provincial laws, the following acts constitute domestic violence:
- Threats that create a reasonable fear for one's safety or property.
- Physical assault includes shoving, slapping, punching, pushing, and kicking.
- Sexual assault includes sexual exploitation, marital rape, child pornography, and other illegal sexual acts.
- Forced confinement/forced marriage and transportation without consent.
- Stalking.
How the Divorce Act defines family violence
The Criminal Code is not the only federal statute that deals with abuse at home. The Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 (2nd Supp), carries its own definition of family violence, and it is deliberately broader than anything in the Criminal Code because it governs parenting decisions rather than punishment.
Section 2(1) of the Divorce Act defines family violence as any conduct, whether or not the conduct constitutes a criminal offence, by a family member towards another family member, that is violent or threatening or that constitutes a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour or that causes that other family member to fear for their own safety or for that of another person.
The section then lists the forms that conduct can take:
- Physical abuse, including forced confinement but excluding the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or another person.
- Sexual abuse.
- Threats to kill or cause bodily harm to any person.
- Harassment, including stalking.
- The failure to provide the necessaries of life.
- Psychological abuse.
- Financial abuse.
- Threats to kill or harm an animal or damage property.
- The killing or harming of an animal or the damaging of property.
The definition also reaches a child's direct or indirect exposure to that conduct.
Two consequences follow for a reader in a separation or parenting dispute. Conduct can count as family violence for Divorce Act purposes even if nobody is ever charged, and a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour is named in the statute even though it is not a standalone criminal offence.
Is coercive control a crime in Canada?
No. As of this update, the Criminal Code contains no standalone offence of coercive control of an intimate partner. Controlling behaviour is prosecuted, if at all, through existing offences such as criminal harassment under section 264, uttering threats under section 264.1, or assault under sections 266 to 268.
Parliament came close. Bill C-332, a private member's bill that would have created a coercive control offence, passed third reading in the House of Commons on June 12, 2024. It was still before a Senate committee when that Parliament ended, so it never received Royal Assent and did not become law.
That gap has a practical edge. A person living with controlling behaviour that has not turned physical may find that no criminal charge fits the facts, while the same behaviour sits squarely inside the Divorce Act definition of family violence and may fall within their province's protection-order legislation. If you are in that position, a protection order application or a family law proceeding can reach conduct that a criminal charge cannot. Check your own province's family violence legislation, or ask a local victim services agency or legal aid clinic which route applies where you live.
Domestic violence laws explained: What are your rights under the Canadian criminal code?
Under the Canadian criminal code, you have the right to use force in self-defence intentionally.

Section 34 of the Criminal Code, as replaced by the Citizen's Arrest and Self-defence Act in 2013, provides a single self-defence test in place of the several overlapping provisions that came before it. It covers defending yourself and defending another person, and it reads the same way whether the accused is the person who called the police or the person the police arrested.
The test has three parts, and all three have to be met:
- Reasonable belief. You believe on reasonable grounds that force is being used against you or another person, or that a threat of force is being made against you or another person.
- Defensive purpose. The act you commit is committed for the purpose of defending or protecting yourself or that other person from that use or threat of force.
- A reasonable act. What you actually did is reasonable in the circumstances.
Nothing in section 34 requires that force be your only option, and the section sets no precondition that you withdraw or retreat first. Whether the use of force was imminent, and whether other means were available to respond to it, is one of the factors a court weighs under section 34(2)(b), alongside the others listed below. The older test, which turned on an apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm coupled with no other means of escape, belonged to the pre-2013 section 34 and no longer applies.
What does "reasonable in the circumstances" mean?
When acting in self-defence, your actions should be proportional and necessary. Meaning do not use more force than is necessary to stop the attack. Furthermore, if the attacker stops, so should you.
Section 34(2) of the Criminal Code sets out the factors a court weighs in deciding whether the act was reasonable, including the nature of the force or threat, whether the use of force was imminent and whether other means were available, the person's role in the incident, whether any party used or threatened to use a weapon, the size, age, gender and physical capabilities of the parties, the nature, duration and history of any relationship between the parties, any history of interaction or communication between them, and the nature and proportionality of the person's response.
"Reasonable force or belief" means that a reasonable person given your situation would act similarly.
How to prove self-defence if accused of domestic violence in Canada
If you rely on self-defence, the evidence usually has to speak to two of the section 34(2) factors in particular:
- Your role in the incident, under section 34(2)(c). Evidence that you responded rather than started the violence weighs in your favour; evidence that you struck first weighs against you.
- The nature and proportionality of your response, under section 34(2)(g). If your spouse threatens you and you stab or shoot the individual, a court is unlikely to find that response proportionate.
The Crown, not the accused, carries the burden of proving the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. Even so, witnesses, photographs, medical records and messages matter in practice, because section 34 turns on what you believed on reasonable grounds and on whether your response was reasonable in the circumstances, and a court can only weigh what is put in front of it.
What to do if your child hits you
Section 43 of the Canadian criminal code allows parents, teachers, and caregivers to use reasonable force to correct a child. The section reads:
"Every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances."
So, if a child attacks you, you have the right to:
- Use reasonable force to defend yourself.
- Use reasonable force to correct the child.
Is it legal to beat a child in Canada?
No, it is not legal to beat a child.
However, it is legal to use reasonable physical force to discipline a child.
To discipline a child, section 43 allows parents and caregivers to use reasonable physical force. However, teachers, may only use reasonable force to restrain or guide a student.
However, "Reasonable force" means:
- Do not use force that causes physical harm or bodily injuries. That includes using weapons or objects such as belts on a child.
- You should not use language that causes a child to reasonably fear for their safety.
- Avoid committing degrading, inhumane, or harmful acts against a child.
- You should not use physical force on a toddler.
In short, spanking, or using force to correct your child is unlawful if (1) The parent does it in an inhumane or degrading manner. (2) The action results in bodily injuries.
If you are under 18 and a victim of violence, you may call the police or a child welfare agency near you.
What are the types of domestic abuse in Canada?
Under the Canadian Criminal Code, it is unlawful to cause:
- Physical assault/abuse.
- Sexual assault/abuse.
- Verbal or emotional abuse.
- Mental or psychological abuse.
- Cultural and identity abuse.
- Financial and economic abuse.
If you commit any of the acts above at home, you may face the following penalties or civil action.
What is the punishment for domestic violence in Canada?
The actions of the abuser dictate the charges. Consequently, persons accused of committing domestic violence in Canada may face the following penalties.
A note on summary conviction maximums, because it is where most outdated sources go wrong. Many Criminal Code offences, including uttering threats and assault causing bodily harm, state an indictable maximum but no separate summary-conviction figure. Those offences fall back on the general default in section 787(1), which now reads a fine of not more than $5,000 or a term of imprisonment of not more than two years less a day, or both. Bill C-75 raised that general default in 2019. Any source still quoting six months or 18 months as the fallback is describing the pre-2019 Criminal Code.
Physical assault/abuse, causing bodily harm, and uttering threats/verbal or emotional abuse
Under section 264.1 of the Canadian Criminal Code, it is unlawful to knowingly utter, convey, or cause a person, including family members, to receive a threat. Threats include:
- Threats to cause bodily harm, kill, injure, or poison a person, animal, or bird belonging to the victim.
- Destroy real or personal property.
For a threat to become a crime, the victim must have reason to fear for their safety. So, if your partner threatens you and you believe the individual has the will and capability to enact the threat. You should notify law enforcement.
Uttering threats to kill or cause bodily harm is a hybrid offence. On indictment, section 264.1(2) sets a maximum of five years in prison. Section 264.1 states no separate summary-conviction maximum, so the general default in section 787(1) applies: two years less a day. Threatening to destroy property or to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird carries a lower indictable maximum of two years under section 264.1(3), with the same two-years-less-a-day summary default.
What are the defences for uttering threats in Canada?
If accused of uttering threats, the prosecution must prove (1) The accused uttered the threats. (2) What words were uttered, and what was the context of the words. To counter the charges, your lawyer may argue:
- A reasonable person would not perceive your words as a threat.
- The words were a reaction to the circumstances (context of the words).
- The accused did not utter the words expecting the victim to take them seriously (joke).
Physical assault/causing bodily injury
The Canadian criminal code defines assault as, quote:
"A person commits an assault when (a) without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly; (b) he attempts or threatens, by an act or a gesture, to apply force to another person, if he has, or causes that other person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect his purpose; or (c) while openly wearing or carrying a weapon or an imitation thereof, he accosts or impedes another person or begs."
There are three levels of assault:
Level 1 domestic assault in Canada
The least serious assault charge in Canada is level 1 assault. You are guilty of level 1 assault if you push or slap someone, or if you threaten to apply force to them by an act or a gesture while you have, or cause them to believe on reasonable grounds that you have, the present ability to carry it out. Words alone are not assault. A purely verbal threat with no act or gesture behind it is charged under section 264.1 instead, which this page covers above.
Under section 266 of the Canadian Criminal Code, level 1 (common) assault is punishable by a maximum sentence of five years for an indictable offence. For summary conviction, the penalty is a maximum of two years minus a day.
Courts treat violence against an intimate partner or a family member as an aggravating factor at sentencing under section 718.2(a)(ii) of the Criminal Code, and abuse of a person under 18 under section 718.2(a)(ii.1). Either can increase the sentence imposed within these maximums.
Level 2 domestic assault/causing bodily harm in Canada
Level 2 assault in Canada occurs when an individual commits an assault using a weapon or threatens to use one. You are guilty of level 2 assault if (1) you carry or use a weapon during the commission of an assault. (2) cause bodily harm. (3) choke, strangle, or suffocate the victim.
Unlawfully causing bodily harm to another, using or threatening to use a weapon, or choking, suffocating, or strangling a complainant is a hybrid offence under section 267 of the Criminal Code. On indictment, the maximum is 10 years in prison. Section 267 sets no separate summary-conviction maximum, so the section 787(1) default applies here as well: two years less a day.
Level 3 domestic assault in Canada
Level 3 assault or aggravated assault involves causing bodily injury such as disfiguring the victim, maiming, wounding, or injuries that put the victim at great risk of death or permanent disfigurement.
Aggravated assault is a straight indictable offence under section 268 of the Criminal Code, meaning the Crown cannot proceed by summary conviction. The maximum penalty is 14 years in prison, regardless of the victim's age.
Firearms prohibition orders after a domestic violence conviction
A domestic violence conviction usually costs the offender their firearms, and in a large class of cases the court has no discretion about it. Section 109(1)(a.1) of the Criminal Code makes a weapons prohibition order mandatory where a person is convicted, or discharged under section 730, of an indictable offence in the commission of which violence was used, threatened or attempted against the person's intimate partner, a child or parent of that partner or of the offender, or any person who resides with them.
Where section 109 applies, the court must make the order. Under section 109(2), a first order bars ordinary firearms and crossbows until at least 10 years after the person's release from imprisonment following the conviction, and bans prohibited firearms, restricted firearms, prohibited weapons, prohibited devices and prohibited ammunition for life. Under section 109(3), a second or subsequent order is a lifetime prohibition across every firearm, crossbow, weapon, device and ammunition category in the list.
Section 110 covers the convictions and discharges that section 109 does not reach. There, the court must consider whether a prohibition order is desirable in the interests of the safety of the person or of any other person. Under section 110(2), such an order runs from the day it is made and ordinarily ends no later than 10 years after the person's release from imprisonment for the offence or, where the person is not then imprisoned, after conviction for or discharge from the offence.
Section 110(2.1) is the exception that matters most to anyone reading this page. Despite that 10-year ceiling, a section 110 order may be imposed for life, or for any shorter duration, where violence was used, threatened or attempted in the commission of the offence against the person's intimate partner, against a child or parent of that partner or of the offender, or against any person who resides with the offender. So even in the cases the mandatory section 109 order does not capture, a domestic violence conviction can still produce a lifetime firearms prohibition.
Watch out: the section 109 order is triggered by the conviction, not by whether a firearm was involved in the offence. An indictable domestic assault charged with no weapon at all still produces a mandatory prohibition order if the Crown proceeds by indictment and secures a conviction.
What are the defences for domestic assault in Canada?
Section 265(4) of the criminal code states that, quote:
"Where an accused alleges that he believed that the complainant consented to the conduct that is the subject-matter of the charge, a judge, if satisfied that there is sufficient evidence and that, if believed by the jury, the evidence would constitute a defence, shall instruct the jury, when reviewing all the evidence relating to the determination of the honesty of the accused's belief, to consider the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief."
Defences for domestic assault and battery in Canada
Depending on the facts presented, the accused may argue:
- The victim consented. A consent defence is only valid if the victim voluntarily consented to a legal act. If the act was illegal, this defence will not work.
- Defence of property. You used reasonable force to stop the destruction of your property.
- Defence of others. You had an honest belief that the victim needed immediate assistance.
- Self-defence.
Domestic sexual assault/abuse.
Just like physical assault, there are three levels of domestic sexual violence in Canada. Level 1 involves minor injuries and the use of threats in the commission of a sexual assault. Level 2 sexual assault involves bodily harm and the use of a weapon or imitation of a weapon resulting in bodily injury. Level 3 sexual assault involves maiming, disfigurement, or damages that put the victim at risk of death or disfigurement.
Domestic sexual assault Canada: what you need to remember
- The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim did not consent.
- Sexual assault occurs when one makes sexual contact with another without consent.
- On indictment, sexual assault carries a maximum of 10 years in prison under section 271, rising to 14 years, with a one-year mandatory minimum, if the complainant is under 16.
- On summary conviction, section 271 states its own figure rather than falling back on the general default: a maximum of 18 months in prison; if the complainant is under 16, the maximum rises to two years less a day, with a mandatory minimum of six months.
- Aggravated sexual assault (level 3) is an indictable-only offence under section 273, with no summary-conviction option, carrying a maximum sentence of life in prison.
- Sexual assault's definition under the criminal code extends to all forms of sexual violence and unwanted touching.
- Domestic sexual violence may include incest, sodomy, sexual interference, an invitation or forcing of sexual touching, child pornography, and sexual exploitation.
- In R. v. Brown, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that self-induced extreme intoxication can, in narrow circumstances, be a defence to violent crimes including sexual assault; Parliament responded with Bill C-28, which received Royal Assent on June 23, 2022 and enacted a new section 33.1 of the Criminal Code requiring the Crown to show the accused departed markedly from the standard of care a reasonable person would observe in becoming that intoxicated.
- A minor cannot legally consent to sexual activity.
Defences for domestic sexual abuse in Canada
A person accused of committing sexual assault in Canada may argue:
- No sexual activity occurred.
- The victim consented.
- The accused was somewhere else at the time of the incident (alibi).
- Insanity or mental incapacity.
- Extreme self-induced intoxication akin to automatism can, in narrow circumstances, be a defence against sexual assault and other violent crimes in Canada, but section 33.1 of the Criminal Code makes it unavailable where the accused departed markedly from the standard of care a reasonable person would observe in becoming intoxicated.
Is emotional abuse against the law in Canada?
In Canada, emotional and psychological abuse refers to a pattern of behaviour one uses against another to control, isolate, or take away the victim's self-respect. The definition encompasses actions including manipulation or gaslighting, constant yelling, criticism, isolation, destruction of property, threats, or violent actions against the victim's pets, and so on.
Under the Canadian Criminal Code, psychological and emotional abuse that may lead to criminal prosecution includes:
(1) Advising a child or family member to commit suicide. (2) Phone harassment. (3) Threatening to harm a family member's pet. (4) Intentionally intimidating a child.
Where the conduct amounts to criminal harassment under section 264 of the Criminal Code, the penalty is up to two years less a day on summary conviction and up to ten years on indictment.
Can you sue for emotional distress in Canada?
Yes. You may sue your partner for emotional distress in Canada. However, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, meaning you must show the court a pattern of abusive behaviour.
What to remember
- When suing for emotional distress, you may have to provide evidence of physical harm, emotional trauma, and psychological harm.
- Signs of emotional distress include anxiety, anger, isolation, a feeling of worthlessness, and personality changes (hard to prove, recommend consulting with a claims lawyer).
What happens if a victim of domestic violence dies in Canada?
As mentioned, under Canadian law, violence that occurs inside the home is treated similarly to violence that occurs outside the home. In other words, if domestic violence results in death or serious injury, the accused will face charges under the criminal code.
The accused may face manslaughter or murder charges, and the line between them is not the one most people expect.
Under section 229 of the Criminal Code, culpable homicide is murder where the accused meant to cause death, or meant to cause bodily harm they knew was likely to cause death and was reckless whether death followed. Planning is not what makes a killing murder. Under section 231, a murder that is planned and deliberate is first degree murder, and all murder that is not first degree murder is second degree murder. Canada has no third degree murder. Section 235 makes a life sentence mandatory on conviction for either degree, so life imprisonment is the minimum punishment, not a ceiling.
Manslaughter is defined in section 234 as culpable homicide that is neither murder nor infanticide. It is usually reached through an unlawful act or through criminal negligence, two of the routes to culpable homicide that section 222(5) sets out. It is not the same thing as an accidental death. A death that is genuinely accidental, with no unlawful act and no criminal negligence behind it, may be no offence at all.
Canada domestic violence laws: Federal protection orders
If you are a victim of domestic violence or at risk, you may apply for a provincial or federal protection order. See Alberta's domestic violence laws above for one province's protection-order framework, and check with your own province's family law information centre for local rules.
Under section 810 of the Canadian criminal code, the court may issue a peace bond to victims or potential victims of domestic violence. Section 810(1) is written to cover a person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person will cause personal injury to them, to their intimate partner or to their child, or will damage their property.
What is a "peace bond"?
A peace bond is a protection order that imposes specific conditions aimed at preventing the subject from committing acts of violence against a family member. Under section 810(3), a justice satisfied that the fear is reasonably grounded may order the defendant to enter into a recognizance to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for a period of not more than 12 months. Failure to obey a peace bond is a separate offence under section 811 of the Criminal Code and may result in up to 4 years in prison. Learn more about peace bonds from the Department of Justice.
What does a peace bond do?
A peace bond may require the subject to do the following:
- Remove all weapons from the home, or forbid the subject from owning a weapon.
- Restrain the subject from direct or indirect communication with the victim.
- Abstain from drug or alcohol abuse.
- Stay away from named places, in the manner of a restraining order.
- Any condition the court deems necessary to keep the potential victim safe.
Note: applying for a protection order under false pretenses may lead to criminal charges.
Clare's law domestic violence Canada
Clare's Law, also called a Disclosure to Protect Against (Domestic or Intimate Partner) Violence Act depending on the province, lets victims or persons at risk of domestic violence apply to police for information about a partner's history of violence, including prior convictions.
What provinces have passed Clare's Law?
Clare's Law schemes are running in Saskatchewan, Alberta, Newfoundland and Labrador, where the Interpersonal Violence Disclosure Protocol is in force and applications are accepted online, and Manitoba, where The Disclosure to Protect Against Intimate Partner Violence Act came into force on March 1, 2026 and applications opened the same day.
The year each province opened its scheme is not stated on most of the government pages linked above, so this page does not put a start date on them. What matters for someone applying today is that the scheme is running, and each of the pages linked above confirms that much for its own province.
Coverage is not nationwide, and the picture changes as provinces pass, proclaim or decline to proclaim their own versions. If your province is not listed above, do not assume a disclosure scheme exists or that it does not; check your provincial government's justice or family violence pages, or ask your local police service, before you rely on one.
Application processes vary by province. Alberta's Clare's Law application is online, while others, including Manitoba's, run through a dedicated intake unit; check your provincial government's website for the exact process.
Related Canadian Guides
Updates
Corrected the summary-conviction maximum for uttering threats and for assault causing bodily harm, which both said 18 months; neither Criminal Code section sets its own figure, so both default to two years less a day under section 787(1). Added new sections on the firearms prohibition that follows an intimate-partner conviction, the Divorce Act definition of family violence, and why coercive control is still not a standalone crime in Canada. Corrected three further errors: the page said a discretionary firearms prohibition can never exceed 10 years, when section 110(2.1) allows a lifetime order in exactly the intimate-partner and household cases this page covers; it listed a requirement that force be your only option in self-defence, which was repealed in 2013 and is now only a factor under section 34(2)(b); and it described manslaughter as accidental death and murder as premeditated killing, neither of which is Canadian law. Fixed a line saying purely verbal threats are assault (they are charged under section 264.1), a line saying a person can be guilty of domestic violence when Canada has no such offence, and the section 43 quotation. Dropped Clare's Law start years that the linked provincial pages do not state. Added a call-911 line and a note on where to find provincial crisis lines.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Corrected two stale summary-conviction maximums. Uttering threats to kill or cause bodily harm (section 264.1) and assault causing bodily harm, assault with a weapon or choking (section 267) both said 18 months. Neither section states its own summary figure, so both fall back on the general default in section 787(1), which Bill C-75 raised to two years less a day in 2019. Added a short explainer of that fallback rule so the numbers on this page can be checked against the Criminal Code. Added a new section on firearms prohibition orders under sections 109 and 110, a mandatory consequence of an indictable conviction involving violence against an intimate partner, a child, a parent or a co-resident, that the page had never mentioned. Added a section on the Divorce Act section 2(1) definition of family violence, which expressly names a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour. Added a section confirming that Canada has no standalone coercive control offence and that Bill C-332 passed the House of Commons on June 12, 2024 but died in Senate committee without Royal Assent. Replaced a statement that the accused bears the burden of proof on self-defence, which contradicted the correct statement elsewhere on the page that the Crown bears it, and tied the self-defence discussion to the statutory factors in section 34(2). Restored the section 265(4) quotation to the exact Criminal Code wording, which had a dropped word. Updated Clare's Law: Manitoba is now in force as of March 1, 2026, and unverified claims about three other provinces were replaced with a direction to check the provincial government or local police. Removed a you-qualify phrasing and an unsourced torture claim from the quick-take list, replacing them with the actual aggravating factors in section 718.2(a)(ii) and (ii.1). Corrected the new firearms section, which stated that a discretionary section 110 order can never run longer than 10 years. Section 110(2.1) allows the order to be imposed for life, or for any shorter duration, where violence was used, threatened or attempted against an intimate partner, a child or parent, or someone who lives with the offender, which is exactly the situation this page addresses. Replaced a self-defence checklist that still carried the pre-2013 requirement that force be your only option; section 34 has no such requirement, and whether other means were available is one factor under section 34(2)(b). Rewrote the homicide passage, which said manslaughter means accidental death and murder means a premeditated killing. Under section 229 a killing is murder where the accused meant to cause death or meant to cause bodily harm they knew was likely to cause death, planning goes to whether the murder is first or second degree under section 231, section 235 makes life imprisonment mandatory, and manslaughter under section 234 is culpable homicide that is not murder or infanticide, usually through an unlawful act or criminal negligence. Corrected a line stating that a purely verbal threat is level 1 assault; section 265(1)(b) requires an act or a gesture, and words alone are charged under section 264.1. Replaced a sentence saying a person can be guilty of domestic violence, which contradicted this page's own opening line that Canada has no such offence. Restored the section 43 quotation to the exact Criminal Code text and closed it. Dropped the Clare's Law start years for Saskatchewan, Alberta and Nova Scotia, none of which the linked government pages state. Added a call-911 line, a pointer to provincial crisis lines, and a note about device monitoring.
Refreshed for accuracy and repaired 2 broken links left over from the WordPress migration, plus fixed newline-squashed list items that were breaking bullet rendering throughout the page. Corrected aggravated assault (section 268), which is a straight indictable offence with a 14-year maximum and no summary-conviction option, not a hybrid offence as previously stated. Fixed the summary-conviction maximums for assault causing bodily harm (18 months, not 2 years) and uttering threats to kill or cause bodily harm (18 months, not 2 years). Corrected sexual assault penalty figures, which had the summary-conviction minimum and maximum reversed, and removed duplicate claims that sexual assault of a victim under 16 carries a maximum of life in prison (that maximum is 14 years; only aggravated sexual assault under section 273 carries up to life). Removed a fabricated one-year minimum sentence for common assault against a victim under 16, replacing it with the correct aggravating-factor sentencing principle under section 718.2(a). Fixed a copy-paste error describing the extreme-intoxication defence as Alberta-specific when it is a nationwide Supreme Court ruling (R. v. Brown), and added the Parliament's Bill C-28 criminal-negligence caveat. Corrected two statements that misattributed the criminal burden of proof to the victim rather than the Crown. Updated the Clare's Law province list, which was stale as of 2022, to reflect that it is now in force in five provinces. Cross-linked to the Alberta domestic violence page and rebuilt the citations list.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Criminal Code
s. 109Mandatory prohibition orderIn force
(1) Where a person is convicted, or discharged under section 730, of (a) an indictable offence in the commission of which violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted and for which the person may be sentenced to imprisonment for ten years or more, (a.1) an indictable offence in the commission of which violence was used, threatened or attempted against (i) the person’s intimate partner, (ii) a child or parent of the person or of anyone referred to in subparagraph (i), or (iii) any person who resides with the person or with anyone referred to in subparagraph (i) or (ii), (b) an offence under subsection 85(1) (using firearm in commission of offence), 85(2) (using imitation firearm in commission of offence), 95(1) (possession of prohibited or restricted firearm with ammunition), 99(1) (weapons trafficking), 100(1) (possession for purpose of weapons trafficking), 102(1) (making automatic firearm), 102.1(1) (possession of computer data), 102.1(2) (distribution of computer data), 103(1) (importing or exporting knowing it is unauthorized) or 104.1(1) (altering cartridge magazine) or section 264 (criminal harassment), (c) an offence relating to the contravention of subsection
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 21 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- R. v. Nur (Supreme Court of Canada 2015, 2015 SCC 15)
- Therrien (Re) (Supreme Court of Canada 2001, 2001 SCC 35)
- R. v. Wiles (Supreme Court of Canada 2005, 2005 SCC 84)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 110Discretionary prohibition orderIn force
(1) Where a person is convicted, or discharged under section 730, of (a) an offence, other than an offence referred to in any of paragraphs 109(1)(a) to (c.1), in the commission of which violence against a person was used, threatened or attempted, or (b) an offence that involves, or the subject-matter of which is, a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, a firearm part, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or an explosive substance and, at the time of the offence, the person was not prohibited by any order made under this Act or any other Act of Parliament from possessing any such thing, the court that sentences the person or directs that the person be discharged, as the case may be, shall, in addition to any other punishment that may be imposed for that offence or any other condition prescribed in the order of discharge, consider whether it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of the person or of any other person, to make an order prohibiting the person from possessing any firearm, cross-bow, prohibited weapon, restricted weapon, prohibited device, firearm part, ammunition, prohibited ammunition or explosive substance, or all such
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 10 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2020
Leading cases:
- Therrien (Re) (Supreme Court of Canada 2001, 2001 SCC 35)
- Montréal (City) v. Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) (Supreme Court of Canada 2008, 2008 SCC 48)
- Williams v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) (Federal Court 2020, 2020 FC 8)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 222HomicideIn force
(1) A person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being. (2) Homicide is culpable or not culpable. (3) Homicide that is not culpable is not an offence. (4) Culpable homicide is murder or manslaughter or infanticide. (5) A person commits culpable homicide when he causes the death of a human being, (a) by means of an unlawful act; (b) by criminal negligence; (c) by causing that human being, by threats or fear of violence or by deception, to do anything that causes his death; or (d) by wilfully frightening that human being, in the case of a child or sick person. (6) Notwithstanding anything in this section, a person does not commit homicide within the meaning of this Act by reason only that he causes the death of a human being by procuring, by false evidence, the conviction and death of that human being by sentence of the law.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 14 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) (Supreme Court of Canada 2015, 2015 SCC 5)
- R. v. Paice (Supreme Court of Canada 2005, 2005 SCC 22)
- R. v. B.F. (Supreme Court of Canada 2025, 2025 SCC 41)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 229MurderIn force
Culpable homicide is murder (a) where the person who causes the death of a human being (i) means to cause his death, or (ii) means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not; (b) where a person, meaning to cause death to a human being or meaning to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and being reckless whether death ensues or not, by accident or mistake causes death to another human being, notwithstanding that he does not mean to cause death or bodily harm to that human being; or (c) if a person, for an unlawful object, does anything that they know is likely to cause death, and by doing so causes the death of a human being, even if they desire to effect their object without causing death or bodily harm to any human being.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 13 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- R. v. Daley (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 53)
- R. v. Briscoe (Supreme Court of Canada 2010, 2010 SCC 13)
- R. v. Nette (Supreme Court of Canada 2001, 2001 SCC 78)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 231Classification of murderIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Murder is first degree murder or second degree murder. (2) Murder is first degree murder when it is planned and deliberate. (3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (2), murder is planned and deliberate when it is committed pursuant to an arrangement under which money or anything of value passes or is intended to pass from one person to another, or is promised by one person to another, as consideration for that other’s causing or assisting in causing the death of anyone or counselling another person to do any act causing or assisting in causing that death. (4) Irrespective of whether a murder is planned and deliberate on the part of any person, murder is first degree murder when the victim is (a) a police officer, police constable, constable, sheriff, deputy sheriff, sheriff’s officer or other person employed for the preservation and maintenance of the public peace, acting in the course of his duties; (b) a warden, deputy warden, instructor, keeper, jailer, guard or other officer or a permanent employee of a prison, acting in the course of his duties;
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 29 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- R. v. Briscoe (Supreme Court of Canada 2010, 2010 SCC 13)
- R. v. Lloyd (Supreme Court of Canada 2016, 2016 SCC 13)
- R. v. Sharma (Supreme Court of Canada 2022, 2022 SCC 39)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Domestic Violence Laws Alberta
s. 234ManslaughterIn force
Culpable homicide that is not murder or infanticide is manslaughter.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 9 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- R. v. Morrisey (Supreme Court of Canada 2000, 2000 SCC 39)
- R. v. Javanmardi (Supreme Court of Canada 2019, 2019 SCC 54)
- R. v. Creighton (Supreme Court of Canada 1993, [1993] 3 SCR 3)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 235Punishment for murderIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Every one who commits first degree murder or second degree murder is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life. (2) For the purposes of Part XXIII, the sentence of imprisonment for life prescribed by this section is a minimum punishment.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 32 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Mugesera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (Supreme Court of Canada 2005, 2005 SCC 40)
- R. v. Calnen (Supreme Court of Canada 2019, 2019 SCC 6)
- R. v. Latimer (Supreme Court of Canada 2001, 2001 SCC 1)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 264Criminal harassmentIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
(1) No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them. (2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of (a) repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them; (b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them; (c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or (d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family. (3) Every person who contravenes this section is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 16 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- Reference re Firearms Act (Can.) (Supreme Court of Canada 2000, 2000 SCC 31)
- Tobin v. Canada (Attorney General) (Federal Court of Appeal 2009, 2009 FCA 254)
- Sauvé v. Canada (Federal Court 2011, 2011 FC 1074)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Domestic Violence Laws in Canada: Charges and Protection
s. 264.1Uttering threatsIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. (2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. (3) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(b) or (c) (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 15 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2018
Leading cases:
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. Scalera (Supreme Court of Canada 2000, 2000 SCC 24)
- R. v. Steele (Supreme Court of Canada 2014, 2014 SCC 61)
- R. v. C.D.; R. v. C.D.K. (Supreme Court of Canada 2005, 2005 SCC 78)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 265AssaultIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) A person commits an assault when (a) without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly; (b) he attempts or threatens, by an act or a gesture, to apply force to another person, if he has, or causes that other person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect his purpose; or (c) while openly wearing or carrying a weapon or an imitation thereof, he accosts or impedes another person or begs. (2) This section applies to all forms of assault, including sexual assault, sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm and aggravated sexual assault. (3) For the purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of (a) the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant; (b) threats or fear of the application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant; (c) fraud; or (d) the exercise of authority.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 42 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases:
- R. v. G.F. (Supreme Court of Canada 2021, 2021 SCC 20)
- R. v. Cinous (Supreme Court of Canada 2002, 2002 SCC 29)
- Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General) (Supreme Court of Canada 2004, 2004 SCC 4)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 266AssaultIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
Every one who commits an assault is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 39 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- R. v. Couture (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 28)
- F.N. (Re) (Supreme Court of Canada 2000, 2000 SCC 35)
- R. v. Stairs (Supreme Court of Canada 2022, 2022 SCC 11)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 267Assault with a weapon or causing bodily harmIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who, in committing an assault, (a) carries, uses or threatens to use a weapon or an imitation thereof, (b) causes bodily harm to the complainant, or (c) chokes, suffocates or strangles the complainant.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 53 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- R. v. Couture (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 28)
- R. v. Steele (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 36)
- R. v. Hawkins (Supreme Court of Canada 1996, [1996] 3 SCR 1043)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 268Aggravated assaultIn force
(1) Every one commits an aggravated assault who wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant. (2) Every one who commits an aggravated assault is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. (3) For greater certainty, in this section, “wounds” or “maims” includes to excise, infibulate or mutilate, in whole or in part, the labia majora, labia minora or clitoris of a person, except where (a) a surgical procedure is performed, by a person duly qualified by provincial law to practise medicine, for the benefit of the physical health of the person or for the purpose of that person having normal reproductive functions or normal sexual appearance or function; or (b) the person is at least eighteen years of age and there is no resulting bodily harm. (4) For the purposes of this section and section 265, no consent to the excision, infibulation or mutilation, in whole or in part, of the labia majora, labia minora or clitoris of a person is valid, except in the cases described in paragraphs (3)(a) and (b).
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 24 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- R. v. Couture (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 28)
- R. v. Hutchinson (Supreme Court of Canada 2014, 2014 SCC 19)
- R. v. K.J.M. (Supreme Court of Canada 2019, 2019 SCC 55)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 271Sexual assaultIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
Everyone who commits a sexual assault is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years or, if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months or, if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years less a day and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of six months.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 93 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- R. v. Sharpe (Supreme Court of Canada 2001, 2001 SCC 2)
- R. v. J.H.S. (Supreme Court of Canada 2008, 2008 SCC 30)
- R. v. Wells (Supreme Court of Canada 2000, 2000 SCC 10)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 273Aggravated sexual assaultIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Every one commits an aggravated sexual assault who, in committing a sexual assault, wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant. (2) Every person who commits an aggravated sexual assault is guilty of an indictable offence and liable (a) if a restricted firearm or prohibited firearm is used in the commission of the offence or if any firearm is used in the commission of the offence and the offence is committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal organization, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of (i) in the case of a first offence, five years, and (ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years; (a.1) in any other case where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years; and (a.2) if the complainant is under the age of 16 years, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years; and (b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 6 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2012
Leading cases:
- R. v. Sharpe (Supreme Court of Canada 2001, 2001 SCC 2)
- R. v. J.A. (Supreme Court of Canada 2011, 2011 SCC 28)
- R. v. Mabior (Supreme Court of Canada 2012, 2012 SCC 47)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 33.1Offences of violence by negligenceIn force
(1) A person who, by reason of self-induced extreme intoxication, lacks the general intent or voluntariness ordinarily required to commit an offence referred to in subsection (3), nonetheless commits the offence if (a) all the other elements of the offence are present; and (b) before they were in a state of extreme intoxication, they departed markedly from the standard of care expected of a reasonable person in the circumstances with respect to the consumption of intoxicating substances. (2) For the purposes of determining whether the person departed markedly from the standard of care, the court must consider the objective foreseeability of the risk that the consumption of the intoxicating substances could cause extreme intoxication and lead the person to harm another person. The court must, in making the determination, also consider all relevant circumstances, including anything that the person did to avoid the risk. (3) This section applies in respect of an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament that includes as an element an assault or any other interference or threat of interference by a person with the bodily integrity of another person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 5 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2022
Leading cases:
- R. v. Daley (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 53)
- R. v. Sullivan (Supreme Court of Canada 2022, 2022 SCC 19)
- R. v. Kirkpatrick (Supreme Court of Canada 2022, 2022 SCC 33)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 34Defence — use or threat of forceIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) A person is not guilty of an offence if (a) they believe on reasonable grounds that force is being used against them or another person or that a threat of force is being made against them or another person; (b) the act that constitutes the offence is committed for the purpose of defending or protecting themselves or the other person from that use or threat of force; and (c) the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances. (2) In determining whether the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances, the court shall consider the relevant circumstances of the person, the other parties and the act, including, but not limited to, the following factors: (a) the nature of the force or threat; (b) the extent to which the use of force was imminent and whether there were other means available to respond to the potential use of force; (c) the person’s role in the incident; (d) whether any party to the incident used or threatened to use a weapon; (e) the size, age, gender and physical capabilities of the parties to the incident;
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 27 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2023
Leading cases:
- R. v. Ferguson (Supreme Court of Canada 2008, 2008 SCC 6)
- R. v. Cinous (Supreme Court of Canada 2002, 2002 SCC 29)
- Alberta v. Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony (Supreme Court of Canada 2009, 2009 SCC 37)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Canadian Criminal Records & Everyday Criminal Law, Citizen's Arrest in Canada: Criminal Code Section 494, Self-Defence Laws in Canada: Sections 34 and 35 Explained
s. 43Correction of child by forceIn force
Every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 7 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2024
Leading cases:
- Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General) (Supreme Court of Canada 2004, 2004 SCC 4)
- R. v. Breault (Supreme Court of Canada 2023, 2023 SCC 9)
- R. v. Magoon (Supreme Court of Canada 2018, 2018 SCC 14)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
s. 718.2Other sentencing principlesIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A court that imposes a sentence shall also take into consideration the following principles: (a) a sentence should be increased or reduced to account for any relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances relating to the offence or the offender, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, (i) evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression, or on any other similar factor, (ii) evidence that the offender, in committing the offence, abused the offender’s intimate partner or a member of the victim or the offender’s family, (ii.1) evidence that the offender, in committing the offence, abused a person under the age of eighteen years, (ii.2) evidence that the offender involved a person under the age of 18 years in the commission of the offence, (iii) evidence that the offender, in committing the offence, abused a position of trust or authority in relation to the victim, (iii.1) evidence that the offence had a significant impact on the victim, considering their age and other personal circumstance
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
s. 787General penaltyIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(1) Unless otherwise provided by law, every person who is convicted of an offence punishable on summary conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $5,000 or to a term of imprisonment of not more than two years less a day, or to both. (2) If the imposition of a fine or the making of an order for the payment of money is authorized by law, but the law does not provide that imprisonment may be imposed in default of payment of the fine or compliance with the order, the court may order that in default of payment of the fine or compliance with the order, as the case may be, the defendant shall be imprisoned for a term of not more than two years less a day.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
s. 810If injury or damage fearedIn forcecited in 7 of our articles
(1) An information may be laid before a justice by or on behalf of any person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person (a) will cause personal injury to them or to their intimate partner or child or will damage their property; or (b) will commit an offence under section 162.1. (2) A justice who receives an information under subsection (1) shall cause the parties to appear before him or before a summary conviction court having jurisdiction in the same territorial division. (3) If the justice or summary conviction court before which the parties appear is satisfied by the evidence adduced that the person on whose behalf the information was laid has reasonable grounds for the fear, the justice or court may order that the defendant enter into a recognizance, with or without sureties, to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for a period of not more than 12 months. (3.01) The justice or summary conviction court may commit the defendant to prison for a term of not more than 12 months if the defendant fails or refuses to enter into the recognizance.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Also relied on in: Peace Bonds in Canada: Section 810 Explained, Neighbour Disputes in Canada: Your Options
s. 811Breach of recognizanceIn forcecited in 3 of our articles
A person bound by a recognizance under any of sections 83.3 and 810 to 810.2 who commits a breach of the recognizance is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than four years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Divorce Act
s. 2DefinitionsIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(1) In this Act, age of majority , in respect of a child, means the age of majority as determined by the laws of the province where the child habitually resides, or, if the child habitually resides outside of Canada, eighteen years of age; ( majeur ) appellate court , in respect of an appeal from a court, means the court exercising appellate jurisdiction with respect to that appeal; ( cour d’appel ) applicable guidelines means (a) if both spouses or former spouses are habitually resident in the same province at the time an application is made for a child support order or for a variation order in respect of a child support order or the amount of a child support is to be calculated or recalculated under section 25.01 or 25.1, and that province has been designated by an order made under subsection (5), the laws of the province specified in the order, and (b) in any other case, the Federal Child Support Guidelines;
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-12 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Cited in 9 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases:
- Bruker v. Marcovitz (Supreme Court of Canada 2007, 2007 SCC 54)
- Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia (Supreme Court of Canada 2026, 2026 SCC 16)
- Chartier v. Chartier (Supreme Court of Canada 1999, [1999] 1 SCR 242)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Canada Child Support Laws: Guidelines and Calculations, Parenting Time and Decision-Making Responsibility in Canada
Search our full record of Canadian federal law — every consolidated Act, in English and French →
Sources and References
- Canadian Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Department of Justice Canada: family law resources, including family violence materials(justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 34 (defence of person, and the reasonableness factors in s 34(2))(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 811 (breach of recognizance, maximum four years)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 718.2(a)(ii) and (ii.1) (abuse of an intimate partner or family member, and abuse of a person under eighteen, as aggravating factors)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 109 (mandatory weapons prohibition orders, including s 109(1)(a.1) for intimate partner and household violence)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 110 (discretionary weapons prohibition orders, including s 110(2.1), which allows a lifetime order where violence was used, threatened or attempted against an intimate partner, a child or parent, or a co-resident)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 222 (homicide, including s 222(5) on the ways culpable homicide is committed)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 229 (when culpable homicide is murder)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 231 (classification of murder: planned and deliberate murder is first degree, all other murder is second degree)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 234 (manslaughter: culpable homicide that is not murder or infanticide)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 235 (punishment for murder: life imprisonment as a minimum punishment)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 (2nd Supp), s 2(1) (definition of family violence, including a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Bill C-332 (coercive control of an intimate partner): passed the House of Commons June 12, 2024, died in Senate committee without Royal Assent(openparliament.ca)
- Criminal Code, s 264 (criminal harassment)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 43 (correction of a child by force)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 787(1) (general penalty on summary conviction: two years less a day)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Department of Justice Canada: Charter Statement on Bill C-75, which raised the general summary conviction maximum(justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 264.1 (uttering threats)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 265 (definition of assault, and s 265(4) on belief in consent)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 266 (common assault)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 267 (assault with a weapon, causing bodily harm, or choking)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 268 (aggravated assault)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 271 (sexual assault)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 273 (aggravated sexual assault)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Criminal Code, s 33.1 (self-induced extreme intoxication, enacted by Bill C-28 in 2022)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- R. v. Brown extreme intoxication ruling (CBC News)(cbc.ca)
- Criminal Code, s 810 (peace bond, recognizance of not more than 12 months)(laws-lois.justice.gc.ca).gov
- Peace bonds - Department of Justice Canada(justice.gc.ca).gov
- Saskatchewan Clare's Law(saskatchewan.ca).gov
- Alberta Clare's Law(alberta.ca).gov
- Newfoundland and Labrador Clare's Law (Interpersonal Violence Disclosure Protocol)(gov.nl.ca).gov
- Manitoba Clare's Law (The Disclosure to Protect Against Intimate Partner Violence Act, in force March 1, 2026)(gov.mb.ca).gov