Virginia
Virginia Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund

Virginia's Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act (VA Code § 59.1-207.9) requires manufacturers to replace or fully refund a new vehicle if the same defect persists after three repair attempts, one attempt for a serious safety defect, or 30 or more cumulative days out of service, all within 18 months of delivery. The consumer chooses between refund and replacement.
Virginia's Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act, codified at VA Code § 59.1-207.9 through § 59.1-207.16:1, protects consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles that turn out to have serious defects. If a manufacturer cannot fix a significant problem after a reasonable number of repair attempts, Virginia law requires the manufacturer to replace the vehicle or issue a full refund.
This guide covers every aspect of Virginia's lemon law, including which vehicles qualify, how the presumption works, what remedies are available, and how to file a claim.
What Vehicles Does Virginia's Lemon Law Cover
Virginia's lemon law applies to specific categories of motor vehicles purchased or leased primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. The law defines covered vehicles under VA Code § 59.1-207.11.

Covered Vehicle Types
| Vehicle Type | Details |
|---|---|
| Passenger cars | Designed to carry no more than 10 persons including the driver |
| Pickup or panel trucks | Registered gross weight of 7,500 pounds or less |
| Motorcycles | As defined in VA Code § 46.2-100 |
| Autocycles | As defined in VA Code § 46.2-100 (added by 2022 amendment) |
| Motor home chassis | Self-propelled motorized chassis of motor homes (not the living portion) |
| Mopeds | As defined in VA Code § 46.2-100 |
| Demonstrators | Dealer demonstration vehicles with remaining manufacturer warranty |
| Leased vehicles | Vehicles with which a manufacturer warranty was issued |
| Electric vehicles | EVs that meet any category above are fully covered |
Vehicles Not Covered
- Living portions of motor homes (only the chassis is covered)
- Commercial vehicles used primarily for business purposes
- Trucks with a registered gross weight exceeding 7,500 pounds
- Vehicles purchased for resale
- Vehicles without a manufacturer warranty
Who Qualifies as a Consumer
Under Virginia law, a "consumer" includes:
- The original purchaser of a motor vehicle (not purchased for resale) used in substantial part for personal, family, or household purposes
- The lessee of such a vehicle
- Any person to whom the vehicle is transferred during the warranty period for the same personal purposes
- Any other person entitled by the warranty terms to enforce warranty obligations
Virginia's Lemon Law Presumption
The heart of Virginia's lemon law is the "presumption" established under VA Code § 59.1-207.13. When certain conditions are met during the 18-month lemon law rights period, the law presumes that the manufacturer has had a reasonable number of repair attempts and that the vehicle is significantly impaired.
Conditions That Trigger the Presumption
| Condition | Threshold | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Repeat repairs for the same defect | 3 or more attempts | The same nonconformity must continue to exist after repairs |
| Serious safety defect | 1 or more attempts | A life-threatening malfunction that continues after repair |
| Total days out of service | 30 or more calendar days | Cumulative total during the lemon law rights period |
All conditions must occur within the lemon law rights period, which is 18 months from the date of original delivery to the consumer.
What Counts as a Nonconformity
A "nonconformity" under Virginia law is a failure to conform with a warranty, a defect, or a condition that significantly impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle. This includes defects that do not affect driveability.
Serious Safety Defect Defined
A "serious safety defect" is a life-threatening malfunction or nonconformity that:
- Impedes the consumer's ability to control or operate the vehicle for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes, OR
- Creates a risk of fire or explosion
Only one repair attempt is required for a serious safety defect to trigger the presumption, reflecting the heightened danger these defects pose.
What "Significant Impairment" Means
"Significant impairment" means the nonconformity renders the motor vehicle:
- Unfit for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes
- Unreliable for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes
- Unsafe for ordinary use or reasonable intended purposes
Extension of the 18-Month Period
The lemon law rights period extends beyond 18 months if the manufacturer has been notified of the nonconformity but has not effectively repaired it by the expiration date. This prevents manufacturers from running out the clock on a claim.
Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement
When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under Virginia law, the consumer has the unconditional right to choose between two remedies. Virginia is one of the states that gives this choice entirely to the consumer, not the manufacturer.
Option 1: Replacement Vehicle
The manufacturer must replace the defective vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle that is:
- Identical or reasonably equivalent to the original vehicle
- Acceptable to the consumer
- In the same condition as the original at the time of purchase or lease
The manufacturer may apply a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the original vehicle.
Option 2: Full Refund
The manufacturer must accept the return of the vehicle and refund the full contract price, including:
- Full purchase price of the vehicle
- Sales tax paid on the transaction
- License and registration fees
- Title fees
- Finance charges and interest
- Transportation and delivery charges
- Dealer preparation charges
- Service contract costs
- Undercoating and rustproofing
- Installed options and accessories
- Incidental damages as defined in VA Code § 8.2-715
Additional Recoverable Damages
Beyond the refund or replacement, consumers may also recover:
- Mileage expenses incurred traveling to and from repair attempts
- Reasonable loss of use during repair periods
Reasonable Allowance for Use (Mileage Offset)
The manufacturer may deduct a "reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle up to the date of the first notice of nonconformity." Virginia law caps this deduction by statute: under VA Code § 59.1-207.11, the reasonable allowance for use "shall not exceed one-half of the amount allowed per mile by the Internal Revenue Service" for business use. Key points:
- The offset is capped at one-half the IRS standard business mileage rate (72.5 cents per mile for 2026, so the maximum offset is approximately $0.3625 per mile; verify the current IRS rate each year)
- The offset is calculated only on miles driven up to the date you first notified the manufacturer of the defect, not the full odometer reading at the time of return
- The manufacturer may also deduct for damage beyond normal wear and tear, unless the damage resulted from the nonconformity itself
- Documenting your exact mileage at the time of first notice is important because the cap applies to those miles only
Right to Continue Driving
The consumer may continue driving the motor vehicle until receiving either the replacement vehicle or the refund. This prevents hardship during the claims process.
Leased Vehicle Coverage
Virginia's lemon law provides specific protections for lessees under VA Code § 59.1-207.13(A1).
Lease-Specific Provisions
When a leased vehicle qualifies as a lemon:
- The lessee's written lease is terminated without penalty
- The vehicle is returned to the manufacturer
- The lessor transfers title to the manufacturer as needed
Collateral Charges for Leases
For leased vehicles, refundable collateral charges include all standard charges plus:
- Capitalized cost reductions made by the lessee
- Credits and allowances for trade-in vehicles
- Fees paid to another party to obtain the lease
- Insurance or other costs the lessor expended for the lessee's benefit
Electric Vehicles and Virginia's Lemon Law
Electric vehicles (EVs), plug-in hybrids, and other alternative-fuel vehicles are fully covered under Virginia's lemon law, provided they fall within the covered vehicle categories listed above. The law does not distinguish between powertrains.
Common EV-specific defects that may qualify as nonconformities include:
- Battery degradation significantly below the manufacturer's stated range
- Repeated charging system failures
- Software malfunctions affecting vehicle operation or safety
- Electric motor or power inverter defects
- Thermal management system failures
EV owners should note that the EV battery warranty (typically 8 years or 100,000 miles under federal mandate) is separate from the lemon law rights period of 18 months. However, if a qualifying battery defect occurs within the 18-month lemon law rights period, the lemon law applies.
Federal Overlay: Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Virginia's lemon law works alongside the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act ( et seq.), which governs written warranties on consumer products including motor vehicles. If a manufacturer breaches a written warranty and cannot cure the breach within a reasonable number of attempts, the Act permits consumers to sue for damages and attorney fees in federal court. Magnuson-Moss provides a backstop for Virginia consumers when state law remedies are unavailable, including for used vehicles that still carry an unexpired manufacturer warranty. Because both laws can apply simultaneously, a consumer with a strong lemon claim may pursue remedies under either or both statutes.
How to File a Lemon Law Claim in Virginia
Filing a successful Virginia lemon law claim requires proper documentation and following specific procedures.
Step 1: Document Everything
Keep detailed records from day one:
- All repair orders and service invoices
- Dates the vehicle was left at the shop
- Specific symptoms and problems experienced
- Correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer
- Mileage at each repair attempt and at first notice of the defect
- Photos or videos of the defect
Step 2: Report the Nonconformity During the Warranty Period
Report the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agents, or an authorized dealer during the manufacturer's warranty period. Repairs may be completed after the warranty expires as long as the defect was reported while the warranty was still in effect.
Step 3: Notify the Manufacturer in Writing
Before seeking a refund or replacement, send written notification to the manufacturer. The manufacturer is required to disclose in the warranty or owner's manual:
- That written notification of the nonconformity is required
- The name and address where the consumer should send written notification
Send this notice by certified mail with return receipt to create a clear paper trail.
Step 4: Allow an Additional Repair Opportunity
If the presumption conditions already exist when you first notify the manufacturer, the manufacturer gets an additional 15 calendar days to correct or repair the nonconformity.
Step 5: Contact the Virginia Attorney General's Office
The Virginia Attorney General's Consumer Protection Section handles lemon law complaints. Contact them before filing a formal claim:
- Phone (in Virginia): 1-800-552-9963
- Phone (outside Virginia): (804) 786-2042
- Hours: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday
- Address: Consumer Protection Section, Office of the Attorney General, 900 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219
- Online: oag.state.va.us consumer protection
Step 6: Consider Informal Dispute Settlement
Under VA Code § 59.1-207.15, if the manufacturer offers an informal dispute settlement procedure such as BBB Auto Line, it is the consumer's choice whether or not to use it before availing themselves of their rights under the lemon law. Virginia does not require consumers to exhaust manufacturer arbitration before pursuing other remedies, and the manufacturer cannot condition its refund or replacement obligation on the consumer using that procedure first.
Step 7: File a Civil Lawsuit If Necessary
If the matter is not resolved through other channels, you may file a civil action in the appropriate Virginia court. Consumers who prevail may recover:
- Reasonable attorney fees
- Expert witness fees
- Court costs
Manufacturer Defenses
Manufacturers may raise affirmative defenses to avoid lemon law liability under Virginia law.
Common Manufacturer Defenses
| Defense | What the Manufacturer Claims | How to Counter It |
|---|---|---|
| No significant impairment | The defect does not significantly impair use, market value, or safety | Document specifically how the defect makes the vehicle unfit, unreliable, or unsafe |
| Consumer abuse or neglect | The nonconformity resulted from the consumer's misuse | Provide complete maintenance records showing proper care |
| Unauthorized modifications | The consumer modified or altered the vehicle | Show the defect existed before the modification or is unrelated to it |
| Force majeure | Repairs could not be performed due to war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster | Document that such conditions did not actually prevent repairs |
Penalty for Manufacturer Non-Compliance
Under VA Code § 59.1-207.15(B)-(C), if a manufacturer fails to comply with a dispute settlement decision within 40 calendar days, the court may triple the value of the award in any subsequent civil action. This treble damages provision creates a strong incentive for manufacturers to honor dispute settlement outcomes promptly.
Lemon Law Disclosure Requirements for Resold Vehicles
Under VA Code § 59.1-207.16:1, vehicles returned under the lemon law carry permanent disclosure obligations. Any manufacturer, agent, or dealer who resells a returned vehicle must disclose:
- That the vehicle was returned under the lemon law
- The nature of the nonconformity that led to the return
This protects future buyers from unknowingly purchasing a vehicle with a documented history of defects.
Used Vehicle Protections
Virginia's lemon law primarily covers new motor vehicles. However, some protections exist for used vehicle situations.
Transferred Vehicles
- If a covered vehicle is transferred during the original manufacturer warranty period, the new owner may enforce the warranty obligations
- The transferee must use the vehicle for personal, family, or household purposes to qualify
Alternative Protections for Used Vehicle Buyers
Used vehicle buyers who do not qualify under the lemon law may have other legal options:
- Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act: Covers vehicles with unexpired manufacturer warranties, regardless of whether purchased new or used
- Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VA Code § 59.1-196 et seq.): Prohibits fraudulent and deceptive trade practices in vehicle sales
- Common law claims: Breach of warranty, fraud, or misrepresentation actions
Statute of Limitations
Strict time limits apply to Virginia lemon law claims under VA Code § 59.1-207.16.
| Situation | Deadline |
|---|---|
| Reporting defects to the manufacturer | Within the 18-month lemon law rights period |
| Filing suit after using informal dispute resolution | 12 months from the final action by the manufacturer |
| General statute of limitations for civil action | Within the 18-month lemon law rights period itself |
If you used the manufacturer's informal dispute settlement procedure within the lemon law rights period, your deadline to file suit is the longer of: 12 months from the manufacturer's final action, or the original lemon law rights period.
More Virginia Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
How many repair attempts does Virginia require before a vehicle qualifies as a lemon?
Virginia law presumes a vehicle is a lemon if the same defect has been subject to three or more repair attempts and continues to exist, or if a serious safety defect persists after just one repair attempt, or if the vehicle has been out of service for 30 or more cumulative calendar days. All of these conditions must occur within 18 months of the original delivery date.
What is a serious safety defect under Virginia lemon law?
A serious safety defect is a life-threatening malfunction or nonconformity that impedes the consumer's ability to control or operate the vehicle for ordinary use, or creates a risk of fire or explosion. Only one repair attempt is needed for this type of defect to trigger the lemon law presumption.
Can I choose between a refund and a replacement vehicle in Virginia?
Yes. Virginia gives consumers the unconditional right to choose a refund over a replacement vehicle. This is stronger than many states where the manufacturer gets to decide the remedy. The refund includes the full purchase price plus all collateral charges and incidental damages, minus a reasonable allowance for use (capped by statute at one-half the IRS business mileage rate) calculated on miles driven up to the date of first notice of the defect.
Does Virginia's lemon law cover electric vehicles?
Yes. Electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and other alternative-fuel vehicles are fully covered under Virginia's lemon law as long as they fall within one of the covered vehicle categories (passenger cars, trucks under 7,500 lbs, motorcycles, autocycles, etc.) and are used primarily for personal purposes. Common EV defects like battery degradation, charging failures, and software issues can qualify as nonconformities.
Do I have to use the manufacturer's arbitration program before filing a lawsuit?
Virginia law gives consumers the choice of whether to use a manufacturer's informal dispute settlement procedure such as BBB Auto Line; the manufacturer cannot require it before owing a refund or replacement. If the manufacturer's program does not resolve the dispute, consumers have 12 months from the final action to file a civil lawsuit.
Updates
Corrected the statute section for the 40-day compliance deadline and treble-damages provision (VA Code 59.1-207.15, not .14) and updated the IRS mileage-rate figure used in the use-allowance example to the 2026 rate.
Independently fact-checked against current primary sources.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Fixed the deadlines table, which stated the general civil-action deadline as 18 months from the expiration of the lemon law rights period (effectively 36 months); VA Code 59.1-207.16 requires suit within the 18-month rights period itself. Also corrected the informal dispute settlement section and matching FAQ answer, which wrongly said manufacturers may require arbitration first; Sec. 59.1-207.15(A) makes it the consumer's choice.
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 7 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
United States Code Title 15
§ 2301DefinitionsIn forcecited in 39 of our articles
For the purposes of this chapter: The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at uscode.house.gov
Cited in 1,671 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1986, 807 F.2d 1000) · Birdsong v. Apple, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2009, 590 F.3d 955) · Robert E. Kelly Virginia L. Kelly v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. (Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2004, 377 F.3d 1034)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Arkansas Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Washington Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify & Get a Refund, Alabama Lemon Law (2026): How to Qualify and Get a Refund
Code of Virginia, Title 59.1: Trade and Commerce
§ 59.1-207.11DefinitionsIn force
As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Collateral charges" means any sales-related or lease-related charges including but not limited to sales tax, license fees, registration fees, title fees, finance charges and interest, transportation charges, dealer preparation charges or any other charges for service contracts, undercoating, rust proofing or installed options, not recoverable from a third party. If a refund involves a lease, "collateral charges" means, in addition to any of the above, capitalized cost reductions, credits and allowances for any trade-in vehicles, fees to another to obtain the lease, and insurance or other costs expended by the lessor for the benefit of the lessee. "Comparable motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is identical or reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced, as the motor vehicle to be replaced existed at the time of purchase or lease with an offset from this value for a reasonable allowance for its use.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at law.lis.virginia.gov
Cited in 10 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: Hoffman v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2013, 940 F. Supp. 2d 347) · Parks v. Newmar Corp. (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2005, 384 F. Supp. 2d 966) · Burke v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2015, 113 F. Supp. 3d 863)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 59.1-207.13Nonconformity of motor vehiclesIn force
A. If the manufacturer, its agents or authorized dealers do not conform the motor vehicle to any applicable warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition, including those that do not affect the driveability of the vehicle, which significantly impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts during the lemon law rights period, the manufacturer shall: 1. Replace the motor vehicle with a comparable motor vehicle acceptable to the consumer, or 2. Accept return of the motor vehicle and refund to the consumer, lessor, and any lienholder as their interest may appear the full contract price, including all collateral charges, incidental damages, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle up to the date of the first notice of nonconformity that is given to the manufacturer, its agents or authorized dealer. Refunds or replacements shall be made to the consumer, lessor or lienholder, if any, as their interests may appear.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at law.lis.virginia.gov
Cited in 14 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLC (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 2018, 896 F.3d 278) · Fred F. Wolf v. Ford Motor Company (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 1987, 829 F.2d 1277) · Burke v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2015, 113 F. Supp. 3d 863)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 59.1-207.14Action to enforce provisions of chapterIn force
Any consumer who suffers loss by reason of a violation of any provision of this chapter may bring a civil action to enforce such provision. Any consumer who is successful in such an action or any defendant in any frivolous action brought by a consumer shall recover reasonable attorney's fees, expert witness fees and court costs incurred by bringing such actions.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at law.lis.virginia.gov
Cited in 4 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: Burke v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2015, 113 F. Supp. 3d 863) · Berl v. BMW of North America, LLC (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2025) · Meyers v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2024)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 59.1-207.15Informal dispute settlement procedureIn force
A. If a manufacturer provides an informal dispute settlement procedure, it shall be the consumer's choice whether or not to use it prior to availing himself of his rights under this chapter. B. If a dispute settlement procedure is resorted to by the consumer and the decision is for a refund or a comparable motor vehicle, the manufacturer shall have forty days from its receipt of the consumer's acceptance of the decision or from the date of a court order to comply with the terms of the decision. C. In any action brought because of the manufacturer's failure to comply with the decision, within the scope of the procedure's authority, rendered as a result of a dispute resolution proceeding or a court order, the court may triple the value of the award stipulated in the decision as provided for in this chapter, plus award other equitable relief the court deems appropriate, including additional attorney's fees.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at law.lis.virginia.gov
Cited in 1 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: Petrovitch v. Nissan North America, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 59.1-207.16Action to be brought within certain timeIn force
Any action brought under this chapter shall be commenced within the lemon law rights period. However, any consumer whose good faith attempts to settle the dispute pursuant to the informal dispute settlement provisions of § 59.1-207.15 have not resulted in the satisfactory resolution of the matter shall have (i) 12 months from the date of the final action taken by the manufacturer in its dispute settlement procedure, if such procedure was resorted to within the lemon law rights period, or (ii) the original lemon law rights period, whichever is longer, to file an action in the proper court.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at law.lis.virginia.gov
Cited in 2 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2025
Leading cases: Reitz v. CVY of Alexandria, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2025) · Meyers v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2024)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 59.1-207.16:1Disclosure of returned vehicles; penaltyIn force
A. If a motor vehicle that is returned to the manufacturer or distributor either under this chapter or by judgment, decree, or arbitration award in this or any other state and is then transferred by a manufacturer or distributor to a dealer, licensed under Chapter 15 (§ 46.2-1500 et seq.) of Title 46.2, in Virginia, the manufacturer or distributor shall disclose this information to the Virginia dealer. B. If the returned vehicle is then made available for resale or for another lease, the manufacturer shall, prior to sale or lease, disclose in writing in a clear and conspicuous manner, on a separate piece of paper in ten-point capital type, to the Virginia dealer that this motor vehicle was returned to the manufacturer, distributor or factory branch, the nature of the defect which resulted in the return, and the condition of the motor vehicle at the time of transfer to the Virginia dealer. It shall be the responsibility of the dealer that receives this disclosure to give notice of its contents to any prospective purchaser or lessee prior to sale or lease, and to transfer the disclosure, or a copy thereof, to the next purchaser or lessee.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at law.lis.virginia.gov
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Virginia Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act (Full Text)(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- VA Code § 59.1-207.13: Nonconformity of Motor Vehicles(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- VA Code § 59.1-207.11: Definitions(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- VA Code § 59.1-207.14: Action to Enforce Chapter (Civil Action; Attorney Fees)(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- VA Code § 59.1-207.15: Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- VA Code § 59.1-207.16: Statute of Limitations(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- VA Code § 59.1-207.16:1: Lemon Law Disclosure Requirements(law.lis.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia DMV: Lemon Law(dmv.virginia.gov).gov
- Virginia Attorney General: Lemon Law Consumer Protection(oag.state.va.us).gov
- Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act(ftc.gov).gov
- Virginia Attorney General: Lemon Law Consumer Information(oag.state.va.us).gov
- Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act: 15 U.S.C. 2301(uscode.house.gov).gov