Maine Lemon Law: Complete Guide for 2026


Maine Lemon Law consumer protection guide

Last verified: February 2026

Key Points

  • Primary Law: Maine Lemon Law, Title 10, Chapter 203-A (10 M.R.S.A. §§ 1161-1169)
  • Coverage: New motor vehicles within 3 years or 18,000 miles of delivery
  • Presumption: 3+ repair attempts for same defect OR 15+ business days out of service
  • Remedies: Replacement vehicle or full refund at consumer’s choice
  • Arbitration: State-certified arbitration administered by Attorney General’s Office
  • Attorney Fees: Prevailing consumers may recover attorney fees under UDAP

Quick Penalties Overview

Violation Type Consumer Remedy Additional Damages
Failure to repair after reasonable attempts Refund or replacement UDAP violations: actual damages plus potential punitive damages
Failure to disclose lemon buyback status Rescission of sale Title branding required; civil penalties
Violation of Chapter 203-A Prima facie UDAP violation Attorney fees and costs

Table of Contents

📑 Table of Contents (click to expand)

Maine’s Lemon Law Overview

Maine’s lemon law, officially codified in Title 10, Chapter 203-A of the Maine Revised Statutes (10 M.R.S.A. §§ 1161-1169), provides robust consumer protections for purchasers and lessees of defective motor vehicles. First enacted in 1983 and substantially strengthened through amendments in 1985, 1987, 1989, 2003, and 2007, Maine’s lemon law requires manufacturers to repurchase or replace vehicles that cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts.

Maine’s lemon law is notable for several consumer-friendly provisions. The state uses a relatively short 15 business day threshold for vehicles being out of service, compared to the 30-day standard in many other states. Maine also has a well-established state-certified arbitration program administered by the Office of the Attorney General, which provides consumers with a free and relatively quick method to resolve disputes.

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1166, any violation of Maine’s lemon law is considered prima facie evidence of an unfair or deceptive trade practice under the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (Title 5, Chapter 10). This means that consumers who successfully prove a lemon law violation may be entitled to additional remedies, including potential punitive damages and attorney fees.

The law applies to vehicles sold or leased in Maine and places the primary obligation on manufacturers, not dealers, to ensure that vehicles conform to express warranties. Dealers are generally not liable under the lemon law unless they make their own express written warranties separate from the manufacturer’s warranties.

What Vehicles Are Covered

Maine’s lemon law covers motor vehicles purchased or leased in the state that are designed for passenger or property conveyance on public highways. Understanding which vehicles qualify is essential before pursuing a claim.

Covered Vehicle Types

  • Passenger cars: Sedans, coupes, hatchbacks, and similar vehicles
  • Trucks: Pickup trucks and similar vehicles under 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight
  • SUVs and crossovers: Sport utility vehicles and crossover vehicles
  • Vans and minivans: Including passenger and cargo configurations
  • Motorcycles: Street-legal motorcycles purchased with manufacturer warranties
  • Leased vehicles: Vehicles leased by consumers for personal use

Vehicles Not Covered

  • Vehicles used primarily for commercial purposes with a gross vehicle weight of 8,500 pounds or more
  • Vehicles owned by governmental entities
  • Vehicles owned by businesses or commercial enterprises that register 3 or more motor vehicles
  • Off-road vehicles not designed for public highway use
  • Boats, recreational vehicles (living quarters portion), and similar non-highway vehicles

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1161, the term “consumer” specifically excludes governmental entities and any business or commercial enterprise that registers three or more motor vehicles. This limitation ensures that the law primarily protects individual consumers rather than fleet purchasers or commercial operations.

Maine’s Lemon Law Presumption

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(3), Maine law creates a presumption that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been made if certain conditions are met. When this presumption applies, the burden shifts to the manufacturer to prove the vehicle is not defective or that additional repair attempts would be successful.

The Lemon Law Presumption Applies When:

Condition Requirement Details
Repair Attempts (Same Problem) 3 or more attempts Same nonconformity must substantially impair use, safety, or value
Brake or Steering Defects 1 or more attempts For serious failures of braking or steering systems
Days Out of Service 15 or more business days Cumulative total for repair of any covered defects
Timeframe Within 3 years or 18,000 miles Whichever comes first from date of original delivery

Important: Maine uses business days rather than calendar days for calculating time out of service. This is more favorable to consumers, as weekends and holidays do not count against the 15-day threshold. A business day is defined as any day during which service departments of authorized dealers are normally open for business.

What Qualifies as a “Substantial” Defect?

The defect must substantially impair the use, safety, or value of the motor vehicle. Examples of qualifying defects include:

  • Engine problems causing stalling, loss of power, or failure to start
  • Transmission defects affecting shifting or drivability
  • Brake system malfunctions or failures
  • Steering problems creating safety hazards
  • Electrical system failures affecting critical vehicle functions
  • Airbag or safety restraint system defects
  • Persistent warning lights indicating serious mechanical issues
  • Water leaks causing interior damage or mold

Minor issues such as cosmetic defects, minor squeaks and rattles, or problems that do not affect safety, use, or resale value typically do not qualify for lemon law relief.

Notice Requirements

Maine’s lemon law includes specific notice requirements that consumers must follow to preserve their rights. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(6), manufacturers may require written notification of a claim, but only if they have clearly and conspicuously disclosed this requirement to the consumer.

Manufacturer Notice Requirements

If a manufacturer requires written notice, they must:

  • Clearly and conspicuously disclose this requirement in the warranty or owner’s manual
  • Include the name and address where consumers should send written notification
  • Provide this information at the time the vehicle is delivered to the consumer

Consumer Notice Options

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(6-A), consumers may also satisfy any manufacturer notice requirement by notifying the authorized dealer in writing. When this occurs, the dealer acts as the manufacturer’s agent and must immediately communicate the consumer’s claim to the manufacturer.

Final Opportunity to Repair

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(3-A), if the manufacturer or its agents have been unable to repair the vehicle, the consumer must notify the manufacturer or authorized dealer in writing of their desire for a refund or replacement. The manufacturer then has a final 7 business day opportunity to correct the nonconformity. For serious brake or steering failures, this notice can be given after just one repair attempt.

Consumer Remedies: Refund vs. Replacement

When a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under Maine law, the consumer has the right to choose between two remedies: a full refund or a replacement vehicle.

Option 1: Vehicle Buyback (Refund)

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(2), the refund must include:

  • Full purchase price: Or, if leased, all lease payments made to date
  • Finance charges: Any paid finance charges on the purchased or leased vehicle
  • Collateral charges: Including sales tax, registration fees, and similar government charges
  • Incidental costs: Reasonable costs for towing, storage, and alternative transportation

Usage Deduction: The manufacturer may deduct a reasonable allowance for the consumer’s use of the vehicle. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1161(4), this allowance cannot exceed the lesser of:

  • One-third of the IRS standard mileage rate multiplied by miles reported at arbitration application, plus all mileage beyond 20,000 miles, OR
  • 10% of the purchase price of the vehicle

Option 2: Replacement Vehicle

Consumers may instead elect to receive a comparable replacement motor vehicle. However, Maine law specifically provides that the consumer may reject any offered replacement and receive a refund instead. This gives consumers significant leverage in negotiations with manufacturers.

Treatment of Liens and Security Interests

Refunds are made to the consumer and lienholder as their interests appear. If a consumer accepts a replacement vehicle, the secured party must consent to transferring the security interest to the replacement vehicle, provided it is comparable in value to the original.

State-Certified Arbitration Process

Maine offers a state-certified arbitration program administered by the Office of the Attorney General. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1165, consumers must first resort to either a manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure (if one exists that complies with federal regulations) or the state-certified arbitration before pursuing court remedies.

Benefits of State-Certified Arbitration

  • Free to consumers: No filing fee for state-certified arbitration
  • Faster resolution: Typically resolved within 40-60 days
  • Less formal: No attorney required, though consumers may hire one
  • Binding on manufacturer: Decisions are binding on the manufacturer if consumer accepts

Arbitration Timeline

The manufacturer’s informal dispute settlement procedure must complete its duties within 40 days after receiving notice of the dispute, or the consumer may proceed directly to seeking other remedies. This requirement is set forth in 16 C.F.R. Part 703.5(d).

Appealing an Arbitration Decision

If the consumer is not satisfied with the arbitration outcome, they retain the right to pursue their claim in court. The arbitration decision is not binding on the consumer unless they choose to accept it.

Manufacturer Defenses

Manufacturers may raise several affirmative defenses to avoid lemon law liability. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1164, these defenses are limited to specific circumstances.

Valid Affirmative Defenses

Defense Manufacturer’s Argument Consumer’s Counter
Lack of substantial impairment Defect does not substantially impair use, safety, or value Document how defect affects daily use, safety concerns, or resale value
Consumer abuse or neglect Problem caused by consumer misuse Provide maintenance records showing proper care
Unauthorized modifications Aftermarket parts or alterations caused defect Show defect existed before modifications or is unrelated

The burden of proving these defenses rests with the manufacturer. Consumers should maintain detailed records of all maintenance performed and avoid making significant modifications to the vehicle while pursuing a lemon law claim.

Title Branding and Disclosure

Maine has strong requirements for disclosing vehicles that have been returned under the lemon law. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(7) and (8), strict disclosure rules apply.

Resale Disclosure Requirements

A vehicle returned to a manufacturer under the lemon law may not be resold without clear and conspicuous written disclosure to any subsequent purchaser (whether consumer or dealer) of:

  • That the vehicle was returned under Chapter 203-A
  • That the vehicle did not conform to the manufacturer’s express warranties
  • The specific ways in which the vehicle failed to conform

Title Branding

Under 29-A M.R.S.A. § 670, vehicles subject to lemon law disclosure requirements must have their titles branded. Additionally, vehicles surrendered as a result of a settlement of state-certified arbitration must be affixed with a written disclosure stating the vehicle was the subject of a Maine Lemon Law settlement agreement when first offered for retail sale.

Electric Vehicle Considerations

Electric vehicles are covered under Maine’s lemon law just like conventional vehicles. However, EVs present unique considerations due to their different technology.

Common EV Defects That May Qualify

  • Battery pack failures or significant capacity degradation
  • Charging system malfunctions (onboard charger, charge port)
  • Range substantially below manufacturer specifications
  • Electric motor or drivetrain problems
  • Thermal management system failures
  • Software issues affecting vehicle operation or safety
  • Regenerative braking system malfunctions

EV-Specific Challenges

  • Software updates: Manufacturers may claim over-the-air updates resolved issues
  • Battery warranty: Separate battery warranties may complicate coverage analysis
  • Dealer expertise: Limited EV service experience at some dealerships
  • Documentation: Software and electrical issues may require specialized diagnostic records

Statute of Limitations

Understanding the time limits for filing a Maine lemon law claim is critical for protecting your rights.

Coverage Period

The lemon law presumption applies during the express warranty term, within 3 years following original delivery, or within the first 18,000 miles of operation, whichever occurs earliest. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(1), the manufacturer’s repair obligation continues even after these periods expire, provided the consumer reported the nonconformity within the applicable timeframe.

Extended Periods

Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1163(4), the warranty term, mileage limit, and out-of-service period are extended by any time during which repair services were unavailable due to war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or other natural disaster.

UDAP Claims

Because violations of Maine’s lemon law constitute prima facie unfair trade practices under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1166, consumers may also pursue claims under Maine’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (5 M.R.S.A. § 205-A et seq.), which has a six-year statute of limitations.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many repair attempts does Maine require before a vehicle is considered a lemon?

Under Maine’s lemon law presumption, a vehicle may qualify as a lemon after three or more repair attempts for the same substantial defect, or after only one repair attempt for a serious brake or steering system failure. Alternatively, if the vehicle has been out of service for 15 or more cumulative business days for repairs, it may also qualify. These conditions must occur within 3 years of delivery or 18,000 miles, whichever comes first.

Do I need an attorney to pursue a Maine lemon law claim?

While you can pursue a claim through state-certified arbitration without an attorney, having legal representation can significantly improve your chances of a favorable outcome. Because lemon law violations are considered unfair trade practices in Maine, prevailing consumers may recover attorney fees, making it easier to find attorneys willing to take cases on contingency.

Does Maine’s lemon law cover leased vehicles?

Yes, leased vehicles are covered under Maine’s lemon law. Under 10 M.R.S.A. § 1161(1), a “consumer” includes lessees of motor vehicles. If your leased vehicle qualifies as a lemon, you may be entitled to a refund of all lease payments made, plus incidental costs.

What is the difference between business days and calendar days under Maine’s law?

Maine uses business days, which is more favorable to consumers. Business days are days when authorized dealer service departments are normally open. Weekends and holidays typically do not count. So 15 business days is roughly equivalent to three weeks of calendar time.

Can a manufacturer charge me for using the vehicle before the defect appeared?

Yes, the manufacturer may deduct a reasonable allowance for use. However, Maine law caps this deduction at the lesser of one-third of the IRS mileage rate times miles driven (plus any miles over 20,000), or 10% of the purchase price. This is a more favorable cap than many states provide.

What if I bought a used car that turns out to be a former lemon?

Maine requires that lemon buyback vehicles have branded titles and that sellers provide clear written disclosure of the vehicle’s history. If a seller failed to disclose that your vehicle was a former lemon, you may have claims under Maine’s Unfair Trade Practices Act in addition to potential fraud claims.

Resources and Legal Help

Official Resources

Related State Laws