Illinois
Illinois Sexting Laws: Legal Consequences and Penalties
Independently fact-checked against primary sources (last audited August 20, 2026). · Reviewed by the RecordingLaw editorial team. · Law checked current as of August 20, 2026. · 1 primary source cited on this page. How we verify our legal content

Illinois handles most minor sexting cases under 705 ILCS 405/3-40, which routes teens into a non-criminal Minor in Need of Supervision (MINS) process rather than felony child pornography charges. Adults who possess or share explicit images of minors face prosecution under 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1, with dissemination carrying Class X felony penalties.
Illinois Teen Sexting Law (MINS)
Illinois law recognizes that labeling teenagers as sex offenders for consensual sexting is often disproportionate and damaging. To address this, the state added a specific provision to the Juvenile Court Act for minors who distribute explicit images of other minors.

Minor in Need of Supervision (MINS)
Under 705 ILCS 405/3-40, a minor under 18 who distributes or disseminates an indecent visual depiction of another minor using a computer or electronic communication device may be:
- Subject to a petition for adjudication, and
- Adjudged a "minor in need of supervision" (MINS) rather than prosecuted as a delinquent or criminal offender.
This is a narrower, different classification than "Minors Requiring Authoritative Intervention" (MRAI), the Article III label the Juvenile Court Act uses elsewhere for runaway, truant, or otherwise unmanageable minors. Section 3-40's own text calls the outcome a minor-in-need-of-supervision adjudication, which allows the juvenile court to intervene without filing criminal charges for child pornography. The focus is on correcting the behavior rather than punishment.
Outcomes of a MINS Adjudication
When a teen is handled under Section 3-40, the statute authorizes the court to order:
- Counseling or supportive services addressing the acts that led to the need for supervision.
- Community Service: Required hours of service to the community.
Crucially, a MINS adjudication under Section 3-40 is not a criminal conviction. It does not result in a sex offender registration requirement, which protects the minor's future opportunities for education and employment.
Child Sexual Abuse Material Laws (§11-20.1)
While the Section 3-40 MINS process offers a lenient path for some teens, Illinois retains strict child sexual abuse material laws (renamed from child pornography effective January 1, 2026; the definitions and penalties are unchanged) under 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1. Prosecutors may still choose to charge minors under this statute in serious cases, and it is the primary statute used for adults who possess or distribute images of minors.
Definition of the Offense
A person commits the offense of child sexual abuse material (formerly called child pornography) if they knowingly:
- Film, videotape, photograph, or create a computer depiction of a child under 18 engaged in sexual conduct.
- Possess with intent to disseminate any such material.
- Reproduce or disseminate (share, send, post) any such material.
- Possess any such material (even without intent to share).
"Sexual conduct" in Illinois is broadly defined and includes lewd exhibition of the genitals or breast, meaning simple nude selfies fall under this definition.
When Teens Are Charged as Adults
Although the minor-in-need-of-supervision pathway under 705 ILCS 405/3-40 exists, it is not guaranteed. A prosecutor may decide to pursue felony child pornography charges against a minor if:
- The images were shared non-consensually (revenge porn).
- The minor used coercion or threats to obtain the images.
- The minor is close to 18 and the victim is significantly younger.
- There is a high volume of images or widespread distribution.
Penalties for Child Sexual Abuse Material
The penalties for violating 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 are extremely severe, and the felony class actually turns on the FORMAT of the material, not on whether it is a first or later offense. Illinois categorizes felonies from Class 4 (lowest) to Class X (highest).
| Offense Type | Felony Class | Potential Sentence |
|---|---|---|
| Possession (Photo/Still Image) | Class 3 Felony | 2 to 5 years prison |
| Possession (Film/Video) | Class 2 Felony | 3 to 7 years prison |
| Dissemination or Reproduction (Photo/Still Image) | Class 1 Felony | 4 to 15 years prison |
| Dissemination or Reproduction (Film/Video) | Class X Felony | 6 to 30 years prison |
A separate enhancement applies only when the child depicted is under 13. Dissemination, reproduction, and production offenses (not simple possession) escalate to Class X regardless of format, while possession alone stays a Class 2 felony. If the victim is under 13 and the defendant has a prior qualifying sex offense conviction, the non-possession offenses carry a 9-year mandatory minimum as a Class X felony. A prior conviction alone, without an under-13 victim, does not trigger this enhancement.
Dissemination vs. Possession
It is critical to note the real difference between possession and dissemination. Simply forwarding a received still image moves the offense from a Class 3 Felony (possession, probationable) to a Class 1 Felony (dissemination, non-probationable). If the material is a film or video rather than a photograph, every tier is one class higher: Class 2 Felony for possession, Class X Felony for dissemination. This strict liability applies regardless of whether the sender realized the severe legal distinction.
Indecent Solicitation of a Child
Adults who attempt to engage in sexting with minors often face charges of Indecent Solicitation of a Child under 720 ILCS 5/11-6. The statute has two separate routes to liability, and they reach different conduct.
Under subsection (a), a person commits this offense if they:
- Are 17 years of age or older.
- Knowingly solicit a child (under 17) or someone they believe to be a child.
- Do so to perform an act of sexual penetration or sexual conduct, with the intent that aggravated criminal sexual assault, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, criminal sexual assault, or aggravated criminal sexual abuse be committed.
Subsection (b) defines "solicit" broadly, as commanding, authorizing, urging, inciting, requesting, or advising another to perform an act "by any means," including in person, over the phone, in writing, or by computer.
Subsection (a-5) is narrower than it is usually described. It reaches a person 17 or older who knowingly discusses an act of sexual conduct or sexual penetration with a child, or with someone they believe to be a child, by means of the Internet (as that term is defined in 720 ILCS 5/16-0.1), with the intent that aggravated criminal sexual assault, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, or aggravated criminal sexual abuse be committed. There is no arrange-a-meeting element in the enacted text, and the subsection is tied to the Internet rather than to carrier text messaging or electronic communication generally. Subsection (a-6) removes any doubt that discussion alone is enough: it is not a defense that the person never solicited the child to perform sexual conduct or sexual penetration.
"Grooming" is a separate Illinois offense under 720 ILCS 5/11-25, not another name for Section 11-6(a-5). Grooming is its own Class 4 felony and covers a wider set of channels, including online services, bulletin board services, and other devices capable of electronic data storage or transmission.
Penalties
- Solicitation Under Subsection (a): Class 1 Felony (4-15 years) if the intended offense would be predatory criminal sexual assault of a child or aggravated criminal sexual assault; Class 2 Felony (3-7 years) if criminal sexual assault; Class 3 Felony (2-5 years) if aggravated criminal sexual abuse.
- Internet Discussion Under Subsection (a-5): A flat Class 4 Felony (1-3 years), regardless of which of the three intended offenses was at issue.
Revenge Porn Laws
Illinois has robust laws addressing "Non-consensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images," commonly known as revenge porn. This applies to images of both adults and minors.
Criminal Statute (§11-23.5)
Under 720 ILCS 5/11-23.5, it is a crime to disseminate an image of another person engaged in a sexual act or with intimate parts exposed if:
- The image was obtained under circumstances where a reasonable person would know it was to remain private.
- The person in the image did not consent to the dissemination.
Penalty: This is a Class 4 Felony, punishable by 1 to 3 years in prison and fines up to $25,000.
Civil Remedies (740 ILCS 190/)
Victims can also sue for damages under the Civil Remedies for Nonconsensual Dissemination of Private Sexual Images Act. This law allows victims to recover:
- Actual damages (emotional distress, economic loss).
- Punitive damages.
- Attorney's fees and court costs.
Courts can also issue emergency orders requiring the immediate removal of the images from websites or social media platforms.
Electronic Harassment & Cyberstalking
Sexting cases often involve related charges if the behavior involves persistence or threats.
Harassment Through Electronic Communications (§26.5-3)
Under 720 ILCS 5/26.5-3, it is illegal to use electronic communication to make obscene comments or threats with the intent to offend, threaten, or harass. This is a Class B Misdemeanor for a first offense.
Cyberstalking (§12-7.5)
Under 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5, a person commits cyberstalking if they use electronic communication to harass a person on at least two separate occasions and create a reasonable apprehension of bodily harm. This is a Class 4 Felony.
Defenses
If you are charged with a sexting-related offense in Illinois, several legal defenses may apply depending on the specific statute used.
For Teen Sexting (MINS)
The primary goal for a defense attorney in a teen sexting case is to ensure the minor is processed under the Section 3-40 minor-in-need-of-supervision framework rather than criminal statutes. Factors supporting this include:
- The consensual nature of the exchange.
- The age proximity of the participants (e.g., two 16-year-olds).
- The lack of further distribution (no "revenge porn" element).
- Clean prior record.
For Child Pornography Charges
- Lack of Intent: You did not intend to disseminate the image.
- Unsolicited Receipt: You received the image involuntarily and did not solicit it. However, you must generally show you did not keep or share it.
- No "Sexual Conduct": Arguing that the image does not meet the strict legal definition of sexual conduct or lewd exhibition under Illinois law.
Juvenile Records & Expungement
One of the most critical aspects of Illinois law regarding teen sexting is the protection of juvenile records.
If a case is handled through the 705 ILCS 405/3-40 supervision pathway:
- There is no public criminal conviction.
- The records are generally confidential.
Under 705 ILCS 405/5-915, most juvenile records are now expunged automatically. There is no birthday to wait for and, in the ordinary case, no petition to file:
- The Illinois State Police and every law enforcement agency in the state must automatically expunge records of pre-18 arrests on or before January 1 of each year, once a year has passed since the arrest, no delinquency petition was filed, and six months have gone by with no new arrest or charge.
- The court must automatically order expungement when a case is dismissed, when the minor is found not delinquent, when supervision terminates successfully, or when the adjudication was for a Class B or Class C misdemeanor or a petty offense. The statute allows 60 business days to complete it.
- The court must automatically order expungement two years after a case closes for any adjudication other than a statutorily disqualified offense, provided no proceedings are pending and there has been no later adjudication or conviction.
Records that fall outside those automatic categories use the petition route in subsection (1), which the person may file at any time and, in the statute's own words, "at no cost to the person." The statute contemplates that the petition may be filed by the person alone or with an attorney's help. Counsel is worth consulting when a record does not clear automatically, or when a disqualified offense is involved. But the older picture of expungement as something that happens only at 18 or 21, and only if you hire someone to petition for it, describes the pre-2018 version of this law. Our guide to expungement covers the general process.
More Illinois Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Is sexting a felony in Illinois?
For adults, possessing or distributing sexual images of minors is a felony (Child Pornography). For teens handled under Section 3-40's minor-in-need-of-supervision (MINS) process, it is a non-criminal adjudication. However, non-consensual dissemination (revenge porn) is a Class 4 Felony for anyone charged as an adult.
Can I be charged if I just received the photo and didn't ask for it?
Mere receipt is generally not prosecuted if you did not solicit the image. However, keeping the image (possession) or forwarding it (dissemination) constitutes a crime. The best course of action is to delete the image immediately and not share it with anyone.
What happens if I show the photo to a friend but don't send it?
Showing a photo on your phone to another person can legally constitute "dissemination" or "exhibition" under Illinois law. This can trigger the same severe penalties as sending the file electronically.
Does the MINS law apply to 18-year-olds?
No. The MINS process under Section 3-40 (705 ILCS 405/3-40) specifically applies to minors under 18. Once you turn 18, you are an adult in the eyes of the law and are subject to full adult criminal penalties, including mandatory sex offender registration for child pornography convictions.
Can parents be held liable for their child's sexting?
Parents are generally not criminally liable for their child's actions unless they facilitated them. However, parents can be held civilly liable for damages in some cases under the Parental Responsibility Law if their child maliciously causes harm to another person.
Is it illegal to sext with my boyfriend if we are both 17?
Technically, creating or possessing nude images of anyone under 18 is child pornography. However, Illinois authorities typically use the Section 3-40 MINS process for consensual cases between peers to avoid ruining teenagers' lives. While it is "illegal," the consequences are a MINS (minor-in-need-of-supervision) adjudication rather than prison.
How do I get my photos off the internet?
If you are a victim of revenge porn, you can seek a civil protective order mandated removal under 740 ILCS 190/. You should also report the content to the hosting platform immediately, as many have policies against non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII).
Updates
Corrected the juvenile records section to reflect that 705 ILCS 405/5-915 now requires automatic expungement in most cases, with no age 18 or 21 trigger and no cost for the residual petition, and narrowed the description of indecent solicitation under 720 ILCS 5/11-6(a-5) to its enacted Internet-discussion elements while noting that grooming is a separate offense under 720 ILCS 5/11-25.
Fixed the page's entire set of dead Illinois legislature (ilga.gov) statute links, which used a retired URL scheme. Corrected the name of the state's teen-sexting classification from "MRAI" to "Minor in Need of Supervision (MINS)," the term the statute itself actually uses. Rebuilt the child pornography penalty table, which is based on whether the material is a photo or a video, not on whether it is a first or repeat offense; the base-case penalty for sharing an image is a Class 1 felony, not the Class X felony the table previously showed.
Independently fact-checked against the cited primary sources; governing law re-checked for recent changes
Reviewed and approved by an editor
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on the statutory provisions below, held in our own legal record and retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 705, Act 405 (Juvenile Court Act of 1987)
§ 3-40Minors involved in electronic dissemination of indecent visual depictions in need of supervisionIn force
(a) For the purposes of this Section: "Computer" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 17-0.5 of the Criminal Code of 2012. "Electronic communication device" means an electronic device, including but not limited to a wireless telephone, personal digital assistant, or a portable or mobile computer, that is capable of transmitting images or pictures. "Indecent visual depiction" means a depiction or portrayal in any pose, posture, or setting involving a lewd exhibition of the unclothed or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or, if such person is female, a fully or partially developed breast of the person. "Minor" means a person under 18 years of age. (b) A minor shall not distribute or disseminate an indecent visual depiction of another minor through the use of a computer or electronic communication device. (c) Adjudication. A minor who violates subsection (b) of this Section may be subject to a petition for adjudication and adjudged a minor in need of supervision. (d) Kinds of dispositional orders.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-08-31 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Illinois Compiled Statutes Chapter 720, Act 5 (Criminal Code of 2012)
§ 11-20.1Child sexual abuse materialIn forcecited in 4 of our articles
(a) Recognizing the enormous negative societal impact that sexually explicit visual depictions of children engaged in sexual abuse activities have on the children who are abused, and the overarching broader impact these materials and imagery have at various levels to the public, especially when this material is disseminated, we are changing all references in Illinois statutes from "child pornography" to "child sexual abuse material". It is important that the statutes of the State of Illinois reflect the content and realities of these materials as the sexual abuse and exploitation of children. The word "pornography" implied legality involving "consent" of which this imagery is not, as children can never "consent" to sexual abuse and sexual exploitation. This name change is not a change in meaning, definitions, statutes or application of the laws of this State and all previous references to "child pornography" are now encapsulated in "child sexual abuse materials".
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 161 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Hollins (Illinois Supreme Court 2012, 971 N.E.2d 504)“…(a)(1)(ii) and (a)(4) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/11-20.1(a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), (a)(4) (West 2008…”
- People v. Lamborn (Illinois Supreme Court 1999, 185 Ill. 2d 585)“…wd" for purposes of the Illinois child pornography statute. 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1 (West 1996). We hold that two of the fi…”
- People v. Gumila (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 981 N.E.2d 507)“…was convicted of possession of child pornography (720 ILCS 5/11-20.1(a)(6) (West 2008)). The physical eviden…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Pornography Laws (2026): Legality & No AV Law Yet, Illinois Deepfake Laws: AI Images, Voice Cloning & Penalties (2026), Illinois Statute of Limitations: Filing Deadlines by Case Type
§ 11-23.5Non-consensual dissemination of private sexual imagesIn forcecited in 5 of our articles
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this Section: "Computer", "computer program", and "data" have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 17-0.5 of this Code. "Image" includes a photograph, film, videotape, digital recording, or other depiction or portrayal of an object, including a human body. "Intimate parts" means the fully unclothed, partially unclothed or transparently clothed genitals, pubic area, anus, or if the person is female, a partially or fully exposed nipple, including exposure through transparent clothing. "Personal identifying information" has the meaning ascribed to the term in Section 16-0.1. "Sexual act" means sexual penetration, masturbation, or sexual activity.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 12 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Austin (Illinois Supreme Court 2019, 2019 IL 123910)“…ating section 11-23.5(b) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b) (West 2016)), which criminalizes…”
- People v. Moeller (Appellate Court of Illinois 2024, 2024 IL App (2d) 230043)“…on of section 11-23.5 of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5 (West 2016)). The court specifically fo…”
- People v. Devine (Illinois Supreme Court 2023, 237 N.E.3d 429)“…nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images (720 ILCS 5/11-23.5(b), (f) (West 2018)). The court se…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois Video Recording Laws: Consent, BIPA, and Surveillance Rules (2026), Illinois Voyeurism and Hidden Camera Laws: Penalties and BIPA Rules (2026)
§ 11-6Indecent solicitation of a childIn force
(a) A person of the age of 17 years and upwards commits indecent solicitation of a child if the person, with the intent that the offense of aggravated criminal sexual assault, criminal sexual assault, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, or aggravated criminal sexual abuse be committed, knowingly solicits a child or one whom he or she believes to be a child to perform an act of sexual penetration or sexual conduct as defined in Section 11-0.1 of this Code. (a-5) A person of the age of 17 years and upwards commits indecent solicitation of a child if the person knowingly discusses an act of sexual conduct or sexual penetration with a child or with one whom he or she believes to be a child by means of the Internet with the intent that the offense of aggravated criminal sexual assault, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, or aggravated criminal sexual abuse be committed. (a-6) It is not a defense to subsection (a-5) that the person did not solicit the child to perform sexual conduct or sexual penetration with the person. (b) Definitions.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 56 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Rexroad (Appellate Court of Illinois 2013, 992 N.E.2d 3)“…alvin Rexroad, of indecent solicitation of a child (720 ILCS 5/11-6(a) (West 2010)). The trial court senten…”
- People v. Vara (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2016 IL App (2d) 140849)“…ent solicitation of a child under section 11-6 of the Code (720 ILCS 5/11-6 (West 2012)). Section 11-6(a) provides…”
- Schlosser v. State (Appellate Court of Illinois 2012, 2012 IL App (3d) 110115)“…Class 2 felony offense of indecent solicitation of a child (720 ILCS 5/11-6 (West 2002)) on December 30, 2002. ¶…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 12-7.5CyberstalkingIn forcecited in 2 of our articles
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she engages in a course of conduct using electronic communication directed at a specific person, and he or she knows or should know that would cause a reasonable person to: (1) fear for his or her safety or the safety of a third person; or (2) suffer other emotional distress. (a-3) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and: (1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person; or (2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint; or (3) at any time knowingly solicits the commission of an act by any person which would be a violation of this Code directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 19 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Relerford (Illinois Supreme Court 2017, 104 N.E.3d 341)“…5/12-7.3(a)(1), (a)(2) (West 2012)) and cyberstalking (720 ILCS 5/12-7.5(a)(1), (a)(2) (West 2012)) and was sent…”
- People v. Crawford (Appellate Court of Illinois 2020, 2019 IL App (1st) 160184)“…son or a family member of that person.” 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5(a), (a-3) (West 2014). Before Re…”
- People v. Sucic (Appellate Court of Illinois 2010)“…conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.” 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5 (West 2008). The cyberstalking statute…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Also relied on in: Illinois GPS Tracking Laws: Is It Legal to Put a Tracker on a Car? (2026)
§ 26.5-3Harassment through electronic communicationsIn force
(a) A person commits harassment through electronic communications when he or she uses electronic communication for any of the following purposes: (1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend; (2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the telephone service or the electronic communication service of any person; (3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or electronic communications device; (4) Transmitting an electronic communication or knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense; (5) Threatening injury to the person or to the property of the person to whom an electronic communication is directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or (6)…
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 16 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Gardner (Appellate Court of Illinois 2024, 247 N.E.3d 708)“…one count of harassment through electronic communications (720 ILCS 5/26.5-3(a)(5) (West 2022)) for sending the thr…”
- Same Condition, LLC v. Codal, Inc. (Appellate Court of Illinois 2021, 453 Ill. Dec. 409)“…al remedies for certain, more egregious conduct. See, e.g., 720 ILCS 5/26.5-3 (West 2018) (describing the offense of…”
- People v. Wilber (Appellate Court of Illinois 2019, 2018 IL App (2d) 170328)“…counts of harassment through electronic communication (720 ILCS 5/26.5-3(a)(5) (West 2016)). The information…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 11-25GroomingIn force
(a) A person commits grooming when, being 5 years or more older than a child, or holding a position of trust, authority, or supervision in relation to the child at the time of the offense, he or she knowingly: (1) uses a computer on-line service, Internet service, local bulletin board service, or any other device capable of electronic data storage or transmission, performs an act in person or by conduct through a third party, or uses written communication to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice, or attempt to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice, a child, a child's guardian, or another person believed by the person to be a child or a child's guardian, to commit any sex offense, to distribute photographs depicting the sex organs of the child, or to otherwise engage in any unlawful sexual conduct with a child or with another person believed by the person to be a child; or (2) engages in a pattern of conduct that seduces, solicits, lures, or entices, or attempts to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice, a child to engage or participate in unlawful sexual conduct that is for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal of the victim, the accused, or another.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 24 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2026
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Vara (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2016 IL App (2d) 140849)“…suant to section 11-25 of the Criminal Code of 2012 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/11-25 (West 2012)), in that he sent a text me…”
- People v. Hubbell (Appellate Court of Illinois 2021, 2021 IL App (2d) 190442)“…by a jury under an indictment charging him with grooming (720 ILCS 5/11-25(a) (West 2016)) in that he knowingly us…”
- People v. Barker (Appellate Court of Illinois 2021, 2021 IL App (1st) 192588)“…tive testimony to the grand jury, (2) the grooming statute (720 ILCS 5/11-25 (West 2016)) is unconstitutional on its…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 16-0.1DefinitionsIn force
In this Article, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the following terms are defined as indicated: "Access" means to use, instruct, communicate with, store data in, retrieve or intercept data from, or otherwise utilize any services of a computer. "Coin-operated machine" includes any automatic vending machine or any part thereof, parking meter, coin telephone, coin-operated transit turnstile, transit fare box, coin laundry machine, coin dry cleaning machine, amusement machine, music machine, vending machine dispensing goods or services, or money changer.
Official text (excerpt) · last checked 2026-07-29 · Read the full text in our law library · Verify at ilga.gov
Cited in 6 court opinions in our collectionLatest citing opinion in our collection: 2025
Opinions citing this section in our collection:
- People v. Bochenek (Illinois Supreme Court 2021, 451 Ill. Dec. 15)“…bers, bank account numbers, and credit card numbers. 720 ILCS 5/16-0.1 (West 2016). This information is unique…”
- People v. Bensen (Appellate Court of Illinois 2017, 2017 IL App (2d) 150085)“…ludes the number assigned to a person’s credit card. 720 ILCS 5/16-0.1 (West 2012). The statute does not defin…”
- People v. Cadengo (Appellate Court of Illinois 2025, 2025 IL App (4th) 240568)“…l was decided. Compare 720 ILCS 5/16G-10 (West 2008), with 720 ILCS 5/16-0.1 (West 2020). Defendant argues that subs…”
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Illinois State Bar Association Lawyer Finder(isba.org)
- Illinois Legal Aid Online(illinoislegalaid.org)
- Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS)(ilga.gov).gov
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC)(missingkids.org)
- Cyber Civil Rights Initiative - Illinois(cybercivilrights.org)
- Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force(icactaskforce.org)
- 705 ILCS 405/5-915 - Expungement of juvenile law enforcement and juvenile court records(ilga.gov)
- 720 ILCS 5/11-6 - Indecent solicitation of a child(ilga.gov)
- 720 ILCS 5/11-25 - Grooming(ilga.gov)