Hawaii Sexting Laws: A Comprehensive Guide (2026)
Hawaii Sexting Laws: A Comprehensive Guide for 2026
The legal landscape surrounding the digital exchange of intimate images in Hawaii is a complex intersection of traditional criminal statutes and modern privacy protections. As technology evolves, so does the way the state prosecutes offenses related to “sexting,” child pornography, and non-consensual image distribution (revenge porn). For residents of Hawaii, understanding these laws is not merely academic; a single misstep with a smartphone can lead to felony charges, mandatory sex offender registration, and lifelong social consequences.
This comprehensive guide details the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) that govern digital sexual conduct. It distinguishes between the harsh penalties intended for predators and the specific statutes designed to address peer-to-peer teen sexting. Furthermore, it explores the defenses available to those accused, the civil remedies for victims of privacy invasions, and the interplay between state and federal jurisdictions.
I. Teen Sexting: Specific Statutes and Penalties
For many years, teenagers who exchanged nude photos faced the same draconian laws as adult child pornographers. Recognizing the disproportionate severity of these penalties for consensual peer behavior, Hawaii enacted specific statutes to address “promoting minor-produced sexual images.” These laws provide a legal framework that treats teen sexting as a distinct offense, often with lesser penalties than traditional felony child abuse charges.
Promoting Minor-Produced Sexual Images in the Second Degree
The statute most relevant to teenagers themselves is HRS § 712-1215.6. This law specifically targets the act of a minor sending or possessing explicit images of themselves or other minors. Unlike the severe felony charges associated with child pornography, this offense is classified as a petty misdemeanor.
HRS § 712-1215.6: Promoting Minor-Produced Sexual Images in the Second Degree
This statute generally applies when a minor knowingly possesses or distributes a nude or sexually explicit image of another minor. The intent of this law is to provide a mechanism for the justice system to intervene without necessarily branding the teenager as a felon or a sex offender for life.
While a petty misdemeanor is a criminal offense, it is the lowest level of crime in Hawaii’s penal code. The focus in these cases, particularly in Family Court, is often on education and rehabilitation rather than punitive incarceration. However, repeat offenses or aggravating circumstances can lead to more serious outcomes.
Promoting Minor-Produced Sexual Images in the First Degree
The law treats adults who solicit these images from minors differently. Under HRS § 712-1215.5, an adult (person 18 years of age or older) commits the offense of Promoting Minor-Produced Sexual Images in the First Degree if they intentionally or knowingly command, request, or encourage a minor to transmit a nude photograph or video.
This offense is a misdemeanor. It is important to note the distinction here. If an adult *merely* solicits the image, they might be charged under this statute. However, if they *receive* and *possess* the image, or if they engage in more predatory luring behavior, prosecutors will likely upgrade the charges to the much more severe felonies of Electronic Enticement or Promoting Child Abuse (discussed in Section II).
Critical Warning: Do not assume that because these “lesser” statutes exist, you are safe from felony charges. Prosecutors have broad discretion. If an 18-year-old high school senior asks a 17-year-old junior for a nude photo, they could technically be charged under HRS § 712-1215.5 (Misdemeanor) OR under the more severe child pornography statutes depending on the facts.
II. Child Pornography and Felony Exploitation
When the conduct goes beyond peer-to-peer experimentation, or when prosecutors decide to pursue the full weight of the law, Hawaii’s statutes on Promoting Child Abuse apply. These are among the most serious crimes in the state, carrying heavy prison sentences.
Promoting Child Abuse in the First Degree
Defined in HRS § 707-750, this statute targets the production of child pornography. A person commits this offense if they knowingly:
- Employ, use, persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexual conduct for the purpose of creating pornographic material.
- Produce, direct, or promote a pornographic performance by a minor.
Penalty: Class A Felony. This is punishable by an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 20 years without the possibility of suspension of sentence or probation in many cases.
Promoting Child Abuse in the Second Degree
Defined in HRS § 707-751, this statute covers the distribution side. A person commits this offense if they knowingly disseminate, distribute, or promote pornographic material depicting a minor.
Penalty: Class B Felony. Punishable by up to 10 years in prison and fines up to $25,000.
Promoting Child Abuse in the Third Degree
Defined in HRS § 707-752, this statute criminalizes the simple possession of child pornography. If a person knowingly possesses material they know to be child pornography, they are guilty of this offense.
Penalty: Class C Felony. Punishable by up to 5 years in prison and fines up to $10,000. Note that possessing *one* image can trigger this charge. Possessing multiple images can lead to multiple counts.
III. Electronic Enticement and Luring
Hawaii has specific laws designed to catch predators before physical contact occurs. The “Electronic Enticement of a Child” statute is a powerful tool for law enforcement, often used in sting operations.
HRS § 707-756: Electronic Enticement of a Child in the First Degree
A person commits this offense if they use a computer or any electronic device to intentionally entice, solicit, or lure a person they know (or believe) to be a child to engage in sexual conduct.
The definition of “sexual conduct” is broad and can include the production of sexual images. This means that using Snapchat, Instagram, or text messages to convince a minor to meet up for sex, or even to engage in sexual acts on camera, constitutes this felony.
Penalty: Class B Felony (up to 10 years in prison). If the offender has prior convictions or if the victim is very young, the penalties can be enhanced. Importantly, the crime is considered “complete” the moment the communication is sent with the requisite intent; no physical meeting needs to take place.
IV. Non-Consensual Pornography (Revenge Porn)
The unauthorized distribution of intimate images, often occurring after a breakup, is a devastating violation of privacy. Hawaii addresses this through its “Violation of Privacy” statutes, effectively criminalizing revenge porn.
Violation of Privacy in the First Degree
Under HRS § 711-1110.9, a person commits this offense if they knowingly disclose an image or video of another person in a state of undress or engaged in sexual activity without that person’s consent. Crucially, the law applies even if the image was originally taken with consent.
The statute requires that the image was produced under circumstances where the person had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Sending a private nude photo to an ex-partner creates such an expectation. Posting that photo to the internet violates it.
Penalty: Class C Felony (up to 5 years in prison). This felony classification reflects the serious, long-term harm caused to the victim’s reputation and mental health.
Civil Remedies for Victims
Beyond criminal prosecution, victims of revenge porn in Hawaii have avenues for civil justice. While Hawaii does not have a specific “revenge porn tort” codified in the same way as some other states, victims can sue under common law theories such as:
- Invasion of Privacy (Public Disclosure of Private Facts): Proving that private details were made public in a highly offensive manner.
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED): Proving that the offender’s conduct was outrageous and caused severe emotional suffering.
Victims can seek damages for emotional distress, medical therapy bills, lost wages, and punitive damages to punish the offender.
V. Sentencing Guidelines and Sex Offender Registration
Understanding the hierarchy of penalties is essential for anyone facing these charges. Hawaii’s sentencing guidelines are indeterminate, meaning the parole board often decides the actual time served, but the maximums are set by statute.
| Offense Class |
Maximum Prison Term |
Maximum Fine |
Examples |
| Class A Felony |
20 Years |
$50,000 |
Promoting Child Abuse (1st Degree) |
| Class B Felony |
10 Years |
$25,000 |
Electronic Enticement; Promoting Child Abuse (2nd Degree) |
| Class C Felony |
5 Years |
$10,000 |
Possession of Child Pornography; Revenge Porn |
| Misdemeanor |
1 Year |
$2,000 |
Adult soliciting minor image (HRS 712-1215.5) |
| Petty Misdemeanor |
30 Days |
$1,000 |
Teen sexting (HRS 712-1215.6) |
Sex Offender Registration (Chapter 846E)
Under HRS Chapter 846E, conviction for a “covered offense” mandates registration with the Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center. This is a life-altering requirement.
- Mandatory Registration: Convictions for Promoting Child Abuse (1st and 2nd Degree) and Electronic Enticement generally require registration.
- Possession Offenses: Conviction for simple possession (3rd Degree) may also trigger registration depending on the specific circumstances and judicial findings.
- Tiered System: Hawaii uses a tiered system (Tier 1, 2, 3) based on the severity of the offense and the risk of re-offense. This determines the duration of registration (ranging from 10 years to life) and the frequency of verification.
VI. Federal Law Implications and Financial Restitution
State laws are only half the picture. The internet is considered a vehicle of interstate commerce, giving the federal government jurisdiction over almost all online sexting cases. Federal laws are notoriously strict and encompass unique financial penalties.
18 U.S.C. § 2252A makes it a federal crime to knowingly transport, ship, receive, or possess child pornography. Federal prosecutors often take cases that involve:
- Large quantities of images.
- Production of original material.
- Cross-border activity (sending images to someone in another state).
- Use of high-tech concealment methods (Dark Web, encryption).
Federal penalties often include mandatory minimum sentences (e.g., 5, 10, or 15 years) that state judges cannot override. If a case is picked up by the FBI or Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the defendant faces a much steeper uphill battle than in state court.
Lifetime Financial Restitution
Perhaps the most overlooked consequence of a federal child pornography conviction is the requirement for restitution under the Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018. This law allows victims depicted in the images to seek restitution from anyone who possessed their image.
Courts have ordered defendants to pay tens of thousands of dollars to victims they have never met, simply for possessing the files. These debts are non-dischargeable in bankruptcy and can follow a defendant for life, financially crippling them long after their prison sentence is served.
VII. Legal Defenses
Despite the severity of these laws, defendants have rights. A skilled criminal defense attorney can employ various strategies depending on the facts of the case.
1. Lack of Intent / Scienter
Most statutes require the defendant to have acted “knowingly” or “intentionally.” If you did not know the file was on your computer (e.g., a pop-up download, a cache file, or a virus), you may lack the criminal intent required for conviction.
2. Age Defense (Mistake of Fact)
For charges like Electronic Enticement, a defendant might argue they honestly and reasonably believed the person was an adult. However, this defense is limited. For child pornography production, age is often a matter of strict liability: knowing the person was a minor is not always required if the person was, in fact, a minor.
3. Consent (for Revenge Porn)
In cases of alleged privacy violations, proving that the victim consented to the distribution of the image is a complete defense. This might be proven through text messages, emails, or witness testimony showing the victim agreed to the posting.
4. Illegal Search and Seizure
Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment can be suppressed. If the police searched your phone without a warrant, or if the warrant was overly broad (a “fishing expedition”), the evidence of sexting might be thrown out of court.
5. The “Romeo and Juliet” Context
While not a statutory defense to the crime itself, the context of a consensual, age-appropriate relationship is a powerful mitigating factor. Defense attorneys use this to argue for charges to be filed under the lesser “Promoting Minor-Produced Sexual Images” statutes rather than felony child abuse laws, or to argue for probation instead of detention.
VIII. School Disciplinary Actions
Before police ever get involved, schools are often the first responders to sexting incidents. The Hawaii Department of Education (HIDOE) has strict administrative rules regarding student conduct (Title 8, Chapter 19).
Sexting can be classified under several Chapter 19 offenses:
- Class A Offense (Assault/Sexual Offenses): If the sexting involves coercion or non-consensual touching/recording.
- Class B Offense (Harassment/Disorderly Conduct): Creating a hostile environment, bullying, or cyberbullying.
- Contraband: Possession of prohibited items or inappropriate material on school grounds.
Consequences: Students can face suspension, dismissal (expulsion), or transfer to another school. Furthermore, school officials are mandatory reporters. If they discover images that constitute child pornography, they are legally required to report it to the police, triggering a criminal investigation.
IX. Digital Citizenship and Prevention
Preventing sexting incidents requires proactive education. Parents and educators play a crucial role in teaching digital citizenship.
- The “Grandma Rule”: A simple heuristic for teens: never send a photo you wouldn’t want your grandmother to see projected on a billboard.
- Digital Footprint: Explaining that “delete” doesn’t mean “gone.” Forensic recovery, screenshots, and cloud backups mean images can exist forever.
- Coercion Awareness: Teaching teens to recognize “sextortion”—when someone threatens to release private photos unless they get more photos or money. This is a serious crime that should be reported to the FBI immediately.
X. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. If I am under 18 and I send a nude photo to my boyfriend who is also under 18, is it a felony?
It can be, but it is more likely to be treated as a petty misdemeanor under HRS § 712-1215.6 (Promoting Minor-Produced Sexual Images in the Second Degree). However, strictly speaking, the image itself fits the definition of child pornography. Law enforcement has discretion, but the specific teen sexting statute was created to avoid felony charges in these scenarios.
2. Can I get in trouble for a photo I received but didn’t ask for?
Yes. Possession is a crime. If you receive an unsolicited explicit image of a minor, do not forward it, do not save it, and do not show it to friends. The safest course of action is to delete it immediately. If you keep it, you are technically in possession of child pornography (HRS § 707-752) or promoting minor-produced images.
3. What is the “age of consent” for sexting in Hawaii?
There is no “age of consent” for sexting that makes it legal for minors. The age of consent for sexual intercourse in Hawaii is 16, but this does not apply to the production of pornographic images. Visual depictions of anyone under 18 engaging in sexual conduct are illegal to produce or possess, regardless of the 16-year-old age of consent for physical acts.
4. Does Hawaii have a “Romeo and Juliet” law?
Hawaii has a “Romeo and Juliet” provision regarding sexual assault penalties (allowing for lighter sentences when the age gap is small), but it does not have a specific, named “Romeo and Juliet” law that automatically legalizes sexting between peers. Instead, the state uses the lesser charges in HRS § 712-1215.6 to handle these cases more leniently.
5. Can parents be held liable for their child’s sexting?
Generally, parents are not criminally liable for their child’s crimes unless they aided or abetted them. However, in civil court, parents could potentially be sued for “negligent supervision” if they knew their child was engaging in harmful behavior (like revenge porn or cyberbullying) and failed to take reasonable steps to stop it.
6. What constitutes “revenge porn”?
Revenge porn is the non-consensual distribution of intimate images. In Hawaii, this falls under HRS § 711-1110.9 (Violation of Privacy in the First Degree). It applies when someone distributes a nude or sexual image of another person without their consent, knowing that the person expected the image to remain private.
7. How does the court decide between a misdemeanor and a felony for sexting?
Prosecutors look at the “totality of the circumstances.” Factors include: the age difference between the parties, whether there was coercion or blackmail involved, whether the images were distributed widely or kept private, and whether the purpose was sexual gratification or malicious shaming. Predatory behavior leads to felonies; consensual teenage mistakes are often steered toward misdemeanors or family court diversion.
8. Can my phone be seized?
Absolutely. If police have probable cause to believe your phone contains evidence of a crime (like child pornography or evidence of enticement), they can seize it and obtain a warrant to search its contents. Forensic experts can often recover deleted images.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws are subject to change. If you are facing legal issues related to sexting or digital crimes, consult with a qualified criminal defense attorney in Hawaii immediately.
