Oregon
Oregon Dog Bite Laws: Liability and Victim Rights

Oregon holds dog owners strictly liable for economic damages such as medical bills and lost wages under ORS 31.360, regardless of whether they knew the dog was dangerous. Victims who also seek non-economic damages such as pain and suffering must separately prove the owner was negligent or knew of the dog's dangerous tendencies.
Estimate your claim: Use our free Oregon Dog Bite Settlement Calculator to see a rough settlement range based on the medical bills, the bite location, the victim's age, and Oregon's liability rule.
How Oregon Dog Bite Liability Works
Oregon uses a dual-track liability system for dog bite claims. Depending on the type of damages sought, victims may rely on strict liability, negligence, or both theories in the same case.

This system gives victims a clear path to recover medical bills and lost wages while requiring additional proof for pain and suffering claims.
Strict Liability for Economic Damages (ORS 31.360)
Under ORS 31.360, a dog bite victim does not need to prove the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous when seeking economic damages. The statute eliminates the traditional "one-bite" defense for these claims.
The statute specifically provides that:
- The victim does not need to prove the owner could foresee the injury
- The owner cannot assert lack of foreseeability as a defense
- The owner may still raise provocation or other available defenses
Economic damages under ORS 31.705 include medical and hospital expenses, lost income, future impairment of earning capacity, costs of substitute domestic services, and repair or replacement of damaged property.
Negligence Claims for Non-Economic Damages
To recover non-economic damages such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, and disfigurement, the victim must prove the dog owner was negligent. This means showing the owner failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent a foreseeable risk of injury.
Evidence that can establish negligence includes:
- The owner knew the dog had previously bitten or lunged at someone
- The owner violated a local leash law or animal control ordinance
- The owner failed to properly restrain or confine the dog
- The dog had a history of aggressive behavior the owner ignored
The One-Bite Rule in Practice
Oregon courts still apply the common law "one-bite rule" in negligence cases. Under this rule, owners face increased liability after the first incident because they can no longer claim ignorance of their dog's dangerous tendencies.
However, the one-bite rule does not protect owners from strict liability for economic damages. Even on a first bite, the owner is responsible for medical bills and lost wages under ORS 31.360.
Types of Damages Available to Victims
Dog bite victims in Oregon may pursue both economic and non-economic damages depending on the strength of their case.
Economic Damages (Strict Liability)
These damages are available without proving negligence:
| Damage Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Medical expenses | Emergency care, surgery, rehabilitation, future treatment |
| Lost income | Wages missed during recovery, reduced earning capacity |
| Property damage | Torn clothing, broken eyeglasses, damaged personal items |
| Domestic services | Costs for household help during recovery |
Non-Economic Damages (Requires Negligence)
These damages require proof that the owner was negligent or knew of the dog's dangerous tendencies:
| Damage Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Pain and suffering | Physical pain from the bite and treatment |
| Emotional distress | Anxiety, PTSD, fear of dogs |
| Disfigurement | Scarring, permanent marks |
| Loss of enjoyment | Reduced quality of life, activity limitations |
Oregon's Comparative Fault Rule (ORS 31.600)
Oregon follows a modified comparative fault system under ORS 31.600. If the victim shares some blame for the incident, their compensation is reduced by their percentage of fault.
The critical threshold is 51%. If a court finds the victim more than 50% at fault, the victim receives nothing.
For example, if a jury awards $50,000 in damages but finds the victim 20% at fault for approaching an unfamiliar dog despite warning signs, the award drops to $40,000.
Actions that could increase a victim's share of fault include:
- Teasing, hitting, or provoking the dog
- Ignoring posted warning signs
- Entering property without permission
- Interfering with a dog that is eating or caring for puppies
Dangerous Dog Designations Under ORS 609
Oregon law creates a tiered classification system for dogs that pose a threat to public safety.
Potentially Dangerous Dogs (ORS 609.035)
A dog qualifies as "potentially dangerous" if it, without provocation and while not on the keeper's property:
- Menaces a person (lunging, growling, snarling, or behavior that would cause a reasonable person to fear for safety)
- Inflicts physical injury on a person that is less severe than a serious physical injury
- Inflicts physical injury on or kills a domestic animal
Dangerous Dogs (ORS 609.098)
A dog is classified as "dangerous" when it:
- Without provocation and in an aggressive manner, inflicts serious physical injury on a person or kills a person
- Acts as a potentially dangerous dog after a prior finding that the keeper violated ORS 609.095 (public nuisance)
- Is used as a weapon in the commission of a crime
Dogs as Public Nuisances (ORS 609.095)
Under ORS 609.095, a potentially dangerous dog that menaces a person, injures a person, or injures or kills a domestic animal while off the keeper's premises is a public nuisance. Other nuisance behaviors include chasing vehicles, damaging property, scattering garbage, and creating prolonged noise disturbances.
Criminal Penalties for Dog Owners (ORS 609.990)
Oregon imposes criminal penalties on owners who fail to control dangerous dogs under ORS 609.990.
| Offense | Classification | Potential Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Maintaining a public nuisance dog (ORS 609.095) | Class B violation | Fine |
| Maintaining a dangerous dog () | Class A misdemeanor | Up to 1 year in jail, up to $6,250 fine |
| Dangerous dog kills a person () | Class C felony | Up to 5 years in prison, up to $125,000 fine |
If a keeper is found guilty of maintaining a dangerous dog, the court must order the dog killed in a humane manner. The court may also order restitution for any physical injury, death, or property damage the dog caused.
Legal Defenses Available to Dog Owners
Dog owners facing liability in Oregon have several defenses recognized by statute and common law.
Provocation
ORS 31.360 specifically preserves the provocation defense even for strict liability claims. If the victim teased, hit, or threatened the dog, the owner may argue the victim caused the bite. The provocation must be sufficient to cause a normally calm dog to react.
Trespassing
The strict liability statute under ORS 31.360 does not apply when the victim was unlawfully on the owner's property. Owners generally owe reduced duties to trespassers, though this defense may be weaker when the trespasser is a child.
Comparative Fault
Under ORS 31.600, any fault on the victim's part reduces their recovery proportionally. If the victim's fault exceeds 50%, they recover nothing.
Assumption of Risk
Professionals who work with animals, such as veterinarians, groomers, and kennel workers, may be found to have assumed the risk of being bitten. This defense depends on the specific circumstances and whether the risk was known and voluntary.
Statute of Limitations: Two Years (ORS 12.110)
Dog bite victims must file a lawsuit within two years of the injury under ORS 12.110. Missing this deadline almost always eliminates the right to recover, regardless of how strong the case is.
Important exceptions and considerations:
- Minors: The limitations period may be tolled (paused) until the victim turns 18, giving additional time to file after reaching adulthood
- Government claims: If the dog owner is a government employee or the bite occurred on government property, shorter notice requirements may apply under the Oregon Tort Claims Act
- Discovery rule: In rare cases where the injury is not immediately apparent, the clock may start when the victim discovers or reasonably should have discovered the injury
Landlord Liability for Tenant Dog Bites
Oregon courts have held that landlords can be liable for injuries caused by a tenant's dog under certain conditions. The Oregon Supreme Court established in a 1993 ruling that a landlord may face liability even for attacks that occur off the rental property.
A landlord may be held liable when:
- The landlord knew or should have known the tenant's dog was dangerous
- The landlord had the authority to require the dog's removal
- The landlord failed to act despite knowing the dog posed an unreasonable risk of harm
Under ORS 90.405, a landlord may deliver a written notice giving the tenant at least 10 days to remove an unpermitted pet that is capable of causing damage to persons or property. Failure to use this authority when the landlord knows of a dangerous dog may support a negligence claim against the landlord.
The Oregon Court of Appeals noted in 2008 that the burden of proof may be lower when the landlord is both the dog owner's landlord and the victim's landlord, since the landlord owes duties to both parties.
Breed-Specific Legislation in Oregon
Oregon does not have a statewide breed-specific legislation (BSL) law. The state also does not preempt local governments from enacting their own breed restrictions.
This means individual cities and counties in Oregon may pass ordinances that restrict or regulate specific breeds. Some Oregon municipalities have enacted restrictions targeting breeds such as pit bulls.
However, many Oregon communities have moved toward behavior-based dangerous dog laws rather than breed-specific bans. The trend reflects growing recognition that a dog's behavior and the owner's management matter more than breed alone.
Dog owners should check local ordinances in their specific city or county for any breed-related restrictions.
Steps to Take After a Dog Bite in Oregon
If a dog bites you in Oregon, these steps protect both your health and your legal rights:
- Get medical treatment immediately. Even minor bites can become infected. Keep all medical records and bills.
- Report the bite to local animal control. Oregon counties maintain animal control departments that document incidents and investigate dangerous dogs.
- File a police report. A formal report creates an official record of the incident.
- Document everything. Photograph your injuries, the location, the dog (if safe), and any torn clothing or damaged property.
- Collect witness information. Get names and contact details from anyone who saw the attack.
- Identify the dog and owner. Obtain the owner's name, address, phone number, and homeowner's or renter's insurance information.
- Preserve physical evidence. Keep torn or bloodstained clothing in a sealed bag.
- Act within the two-year deadline. Under ORS 12.110, you must file suit within two years of the bite.
More Oregon Laws
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Oregon have strict liability for dog bites?
Yes, but only for economic damages. Under ORS 31.360, dog owners are strictly liable for medical bills, lost wages, and other economic losses caused by their dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was dangerous. To recover non-economic damages like pain and suffering, the victim must prove the owner was negligent.
How long do I have to file a dog bite lawsuit in Oregon?
You have two years from the date of the bite under ORS 12.110. If the victim is a minor, the deadline may be extended until after they turn 18. Claims against government entities may have shorter notice requirements.
What happens if I was partially at fault for the dog bite?
Oregon uses a modified comparative fault system under ORS 31.600. Your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. If you are found more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover any compensation. For example, if you are 30% at fault and damages total $20,000, you would receive $14,000.
What are the criminal penalties for owning a dangerous dog in Oregon?
Maintaining a dangerous dog is a Class A misdemeanor under ORS 609.098, punishable by up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $6,250. If a dangerous dog kills a person, the charge becomes a Class C felony with up to five years in prison and a $125,000 fine. The court must also order the dog killed in a humane manner.
Can a landlord be held liable for a tenant's dog bite in Oregon?
Yes. Oregon courts have ruled that landlords can be liable if they knew or should have known the tenant's dog was dangerous and failed to act. Under ORS 90.405, landlords have the authority to require removal of a dangerous pet. Failure to exercise that authority when the landlord knows of a risk may support a negligence claim.
Injured in Oregon? Get a free case review from a personal-injury attorney
If someone else's negligence caused your injury, you may be owed compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Get a free, no-obligation review from a Oregon personal-injury attorney. Most work on contingency, so there is no upfront cost.
Updates
Restored the primary, most severe basis for an Oregon 'dangerous dog' classification (an unprovoked attack causing serious injury or death, ORS 609.098(1)(a)), which had been omitted, and removed a sterilization-restriction claim misattributed to dangerous-dog convictions (ORS 609.990(6) excludes 609.098 violations from that restriction).
Governing law re-checked for recent changes
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 2 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 609: Dogs; Exotic Animals; Dealers
§ 609.098Maintaining dangerous dogIn force
(1) As used in this section, “dangerous dog” means a dog that: (a) Without provocation and in an aggressive manner inflicts serious physical injury, as defined in ORS 161.015, on a person or kills a person; (b) Acts as a potentially dangerous dog, as defined in ORS 609.035, after having previously committed an act as a potentially dangerous dog that resulted in the keeper being found to have violated ORS 609.095; or (c) Is used as a weapon in the commission of a crime. (2) A person commits the crime of maintaining a dangerous dog if the person is the keeper of a dog and the person, with criminal negligence, fails to prevent the dog from engaging in an act described in subsection (1) of this section. (3) Maintaining a dangerous dog is punishable as described in ORS 609.990. [2005 c.840 §2] Note: 609.098 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 609 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 3 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 2026
Leading cases: State v. Kayne (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2026, 350 Or. App. 641) · State v. Newcomb (Oregon Supreme Court 2016) · Guilfoy v. Marion County Dog Services (Court of Appeals of Oregon 2025, 340 Or. App. 794)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
§ 609.990Penalties for ORS 609.060, 609.095, 609.098, 609.100, 609.169 and 609.405; disposition of dog by courtIn force
(1) Violation of ORS 609.060 (2), 609.100 or 609.169 is a Class B violation. (2) Maintaining a public nuisance in violation of ORS 609.095 (2) or (3) is a Class B violation. (3)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, violation of ORS 609.098 is a Class A misdemeanor. (b) If a dog kills a person, violation of ORS 609.098 is a Class C felony. (c) If a keeper violates ORS 609.098, the court shall order the dangerous dog killed in a humane manner. (4) Violation of ORS 609.405 constitutes a Class C misdemeanor. (5) In addition to any fine or sentence imposed under this section, a court may order a person who violates ORS 609.060 (2), 609.095, 609.098, 609.100, 609.169 or 609.405 to pay restitution for any physical injury, death or property damage caused by the dog as a result of the keeper’s violation of ORS 609.060 (2), 609.095, 609.098, 609.100, 609.169 or 609.405. The court may also order the person to pay the cost of keeping the dog in impoundment.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-29 · Read the full section at oregonlegislature.gov
Cited in 2 court opinionsMost recently applied by a court: 1984
Leading cases: State v. Griffin (Court of Appeals of Oregon 1984, 69 Or. App. 199) · Behnke v. Jordan (Oregon Supreme Court 1976, 275 Or. 199)
Identified automatically from the court opinions citing this section — not a ranking of which case controls.
Explore the law
This article also draws on these acts and chapters (opening at their first section): Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 609: Dogs; Exotic Animals; Dealers § 609.010
Related law for further reading — not part of this article’s citations.
Search our full record of US law — 2.1 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- ORS 31.360 - Proof required for claim of economic damages in action arising from injury caused by dog(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 31.705 - Economic and noneconomic damages defined(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 31.600 - Contributory negligence not bar to recovery; comparative negligence standard(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 609.098 - Maintaining dangerous dog(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 609.095 - Dog as public nuisance(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 609.990 - Penalties for dangerous dog and public nuisance violations(oregon.public.law)
- ORS Chapter 609 - Dogs; Exotic Animals; Dealers(oregonlegislature.gov).gov
- ORS 12.110 - Statute of limitations for personal injury actions(oregon.public.law)
- ORS 90.405 - Effect of tenant keeping unpermitted pet(oregon.public.law)