Biometric Privacy Laws by State (2026): BIPA, CUBI & Consent
Most U.S. states do not have a dedicated biometric privacy law. Only Illinois (BIPA), Texas (CUBI), and Washington have stand-alone biometric statutes. About twenty more states protect biometric data as sensitive data under a broader consumer privacy law, and the rest cover it only through data-breach notification rules. There is no federal biometric privacy law.
Jurisdiction scope: This guide covers U.S. state biometric privacy laws (fingerprints, facial geometry, voiceprints, retina and iris scans) as of 2026. It is general legal information, not legal advice.
Which States Have Biometric Privacy Laws?
A biometric identifier is a measurement of a unique physical trait, such as a fingerprint, faceprint, voiceprint, or iris scan. As of 2026, only three states regulate the collection of biometric identifiers with a dedicated statute. Everywhere else, biometric data is protected either as a category of sensitive data under a general consumer privacy law or only through data-breach notification rules. No federal law specifically governs commercial biometric data, so the protections that apply to you depend entirely on your state.
The single most important distinction is whether a state gives individuals a private right of action, meaning the ability to sue on their own. Only Illinois does. That one feature is why Illinois is the center of biometric litigation in the country.
The Three Dedicated Biometric Laws
Illinois, Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), 740 ILCS 14. Enacted in 2008, BIPA is the strictest biometric law in the United States. A private entity must obtain written consent before collecting a person's biometric identifier, publish a retention and destruction schedule, and never sell biometric data. BIPA is the only biometric law with a private right of action, and it sets statutory damages of $1,000 per negligent violation and $5,000 per reckless or intentional violation, plus attorney fees. The Illinois Supreme Court has held that a person does not need to prove actual harm to sue (Rosenbach v. Six Flags, 2019).
Texas, Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI), Business and Commerce Code 503.001. Texas requires informed consent before capturing a biometric identifier for a commercial purpose and limits how long it can be retained. Unlike BIPA, CUBI has no private right of action; only the Texas Attorney General can enforce it, with civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Washington, RCW 19.375 and the My Health My Data Act. Washington's 2017 biometric law requires notice and consent before enrolling a biometric identifier in a database for a commercial purpose, enforced by the Attorney General. Washington went further in 2023 with the My Health My Data Act, which treats biometric data tied to health as protected consumer health data and includes a private right of action.
Biometric Data as Sensitive Data Under State Privacy Laws
Roughly twenty states have passed comprehensive consumer privacy laws, and nearly all of them classify biometric data as sensitive data. These include California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Texas, Oregon, Montana, and others. Under these laws, a business generally must obtain opt-in consent (or, in California, honor an opt-out) before processing biometric data, and consumers gain rights to access and delete it. Colorado amended its privacy act in 2024 to add specific biometric provisions. These protections are real but are enforced by the state attorney general, not through individual lawsuits.
States Without a Dedicated Biometric Law
In the remaining states, there is no statute that specifically restricts collecting biometric identifiers. Biometric data is usually still listed as protected personal information in the state's data-breach notification law, so a company that suffers a breach involving biometric data must notify affected residents. But there is generally no requirement to obtain consent before collection, and no individual right to sue over the collection itself.
Biometric Privacy Laws by State
The table below links to a detailed guide for each state. Select your state for the specific statute, consent rules, penalties, and recent changes.
| State | Dedicated biometric law? | Key statute | How biometric data is protected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Alaska | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Arizona | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Arkansas | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| California | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under California's privacy law |
| Colorado | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Colorado's privacy law |
| Connecticut | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Connecticut's privacy law |
| Delaware | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Delaware's privacy law |
| District of Columbia | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Florida | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Georgia | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Hawaii | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Idaho | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Illinois | Yes | BIPA (740 ILCS 14) | Dedicated statute (strongest protection) |
| Indiana | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Indiana's privacy law |
| Iowa | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Iowa's privacy law |
| Kansas | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Kentucky | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Kentucky's privacy law |
| Louisiana | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Maine | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Maryland | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Maryland's privacy law |
| Massachusetts | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Michigan | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Minnesota | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Minnesota's privacy law |
| Mississippi | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Missouri | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Montana | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Montana's privacy law |
| Nebraska | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Nebraska's privacy law |
| Nevada | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| New Hampshire | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under New Hampshire's privacy law |
| New Jersey | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under New Jersey's privacy law |
| New Mexico | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| New York | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| North Carolina | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| North Dakota | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Ohio | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Oklahoma | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Oregon | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Oregon's privacy law |
| Pennsylvania | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Rhode Island | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Rhode Island's privacy law |
| South Carolina | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| South Dakota | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Tennessee | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Tennessee's privacy law |
| Texas | Yes | CUBI (Bus. & Com. Code 503.001) | Dedicated statute (strongest protection) |
| Utah | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Utah's privacy law |
| Vermont | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Virginia | No | None | Sensitive data, opt-in consent under Virginia's privacy law |
| Washington | Yes | RCW 19.375 + My Health My Data Act | Dedicated statute (strongest protection) |
| West Virginia | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Wisconsin | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
| Wyoming | No | None | Mainly data-breach notification coverage |
What About BIPA Specifically?
Because Illinois BIPA drives most biometric litigation in the country, it is worth understanding on its own. For the statute's consent and retention requirements, the landmark cases, and how the per-scan damages question affects employers, see our detailed BIPA explainer, and for the Illinois state context, our Illinois biometric privacy guide.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which states have biometric privacy laws?
Only Illinois (BIPA), Texas (CUBI), and Washington have dedicated biometric statutes. About twenty more states protect biometric data as sensitive data under a comprehensive consumer privacy law, and the rest cover it through data-breach notification rules only.
Is there a federal biometric privacy law?
No. There is no federal law that specifically regulates commercial collection of biometric identifiers. Protection depends entirely on the state where the data is collected.
Can I sue a company for collecting my biometric data?
Only in Illinois. BIPA is the only biometric law with a private right of action, allowing individuals to sue for statutory damages of $1,000 or $5,000 per violation. Texas and Washington laws are enforced only by the state attorney general.
What counts as a biometric identifier?
Generally a measurement of a unique physical characteristic used to identify a person, such as a fingerprint, faceprint or facial geometry, voiceprint, or retina or iris scan. Exact definitions vary by state.
Do comprehensive privacy laws protect biometric data?
Yes. States with comprehensive consumer privacy laws, such as California, Virginia, Colorado, and Connecticut, treat biometric data as sensitive data that generally requires opt-in consent before processing, along with rights to access and delete it.
The Law Behind This Article
This article rests on 2 statutory provisions held in our own legal record, each retrieved from the official source. Tap a section to read the operative text.
California Civil Code
§ 1798.140In forcecited in 3 of our articles
Definitions For purposes of this title: (a) “Advertising and marketing” means a communication by a business or a person acting on the business’ behalf in any medium intended to induce a consumer to obtain goods, services, or employment. (b) “Aggregate consumer information” means information that relates to a group or category of consumers, from which individual consumer identities have been removed, that is not linked or reasonably linkable to any consumer or household, including via a device. “Aggregate consumer information” does not mean one or more individual consumer records that have been deidentified. (c) “Biometric information” means an individual’s physiological, biological, or behavioral characteristics, including information pertaining to an individual’s deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), that is used or is intended to be used singly or in combination with each other or with other identifying data, to establish individual identity.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
Also relied on in: California Data Privacy Laws: CCPA, CPRA & Consumer Rights (2026), California Biometric Privacy Laws: Collection, Consent & Penalties (2026)
Texas Business & Commerce Code
§ 503.001CAPTURE OR USE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIERIn forcecited in 8 of our articles
(a) In this section: (1) "Artificial intelligence system" has the meaning assigned by Section 551.001. (2) "Biometric identifier" means a retina or iris scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or record of hand or face geometry. (b) A person may not capture a biometric identifier of an individual for a commercial purpose unless the person: (1) informs the individual before capturing the biometric identifier; and (2) receives the individual's consent to capture the biometric identifier. (b-1) For purposes of Subsection (b), an individual has not been informed of and has not provided consent for the capture or storage of a biometric identifier of an individual for a commercial purpose based solely on the existence of an image or other media containing one or more biometric identifiers of the individual on the Internet or other publicly available source unless the image or other media was made publicly available by the individual to whom the biometric identifiers relate.
Official text (excerpt) · as of 2026-07-28 · Read the full section at statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Also relied on in: Amazon Ring Sued Over "Familiar Faces" Facial Recognition (2026), Alabama Smart Glasses Recording Laws, Oklahoma Smart Glasses Recording Laws 2026
Search our full record of US law — 1.79 million sections, every state + federal →
Sources and References
- Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14(ilga.gov).gov
- Texas Business and Commerce Code 503.001 (CUBI)(statutes.capitol.texas.gov).gov
- Washington RCW 19.375 (Biometric Identifiers)(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- Washington My Health My Data Act, RCW 19.373(app.leg.wa.gov).gov
- California Civil Code 1798.140 (CCPA sensitive personal information)(leginfo.legislature.ca.gov).gov
- Colorado HB24-1130 (biometric amendment to the Colorado Privacy Act)(leg.colorado.gov).gov